Trending

System Builder Marathon, December 2010: $1000 PC

By Apevia 

Although we were afraid of the results, this time around we decided to try something new, forgoing the Core i5 in favor of a dual-core Core i3 CPU in our build. Can the higher clock rate compensate for the loss of two physical cores in our $1000 system?

Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is too easy for these systems, once again demonstrating a CPU bottleneck. It takes the GeForce GTX 460s in SLI up to 2560x1600 before they're finally able to catch up to last quarter's performance numbers. Applying anti-aliasing extends that lead at our highest benchmarked resolution.

Here more than anywhere, the dual-core Intel chip is hurting our overall performance picture.

116 Comments Comment from the forums
  • AMW1011 14 December 2010 12:17
    I can't say I'm impressed this time. You should never have went with a clarksdale, they are simply bad. Getting a more reasonably priced motherboard, cutting another $20 from the HDD and PSU, and an i5 750, would have been much better.

    Still, we have more information than before so I can't complain.
    Reply
  • Poisoner 14 December 2010 12:24
    That PSU only has 2 PCI-E hook ups. So you'll have to use adapters in this build. Pathetic.
    Reply
  • ivan_chess 14 December 2010 12:32
    The CPU choice was a little disappointing this time around. A Core i5 or even a comparably priced AMD processor would have done much better (especially in productivity because four cores are typically better than two).
    Reply
  • adbat 14 December 2010 12:38
    I think it would be good to include previous build in the test system page it would make comparison easier.
    Reply
  • duk3 14 December 2010 12:43
    1 tb 7200.12 hard drive?
    GTX 570? (debatable)
    Cheaper motherboard, maybe not supporting SLI if gtx 570 is taken over 460 sli?
    $50 corsair ddr3 1600?
    i5 760 with these savings?
    Reply
  • Core2uu 14 December 2010 12:50
    I think we're missing the point of including the Core i3 in this month's build. The purpose was to explore the CPU bottle-necking that can be observed on today's common applications because threading implementation has managed to find itself actually put into effect. Throwing in an i5 760 would have been too predictable and too boring. This puts perspective on the fact that dual-cores matched with high clock speeds are no longer the performance kings as was true more than a year ago.
    Reply
  • scrumworks 14 December 2010 13:16
    Tom's nvidia -line continues. No surprises there.
    Reply
  • amirp 14 December 2010 13:25
    like they said in the previous article even the 6000 series radeons weren't out when they made these articles,
    reading comprehensions noobs
    Reply
  • amirp 14 December 2010 13:26
    *comprehension
    Reply
  • sudeshc 14 December 2010 13:30
    Not impressed, could have been better.
    Reply