System Builder Marathon, May '09: $600 Gaming PC

Name: Case, Power Supply, And Optical Drive - System Builder Marathon, May &#039;09: $600 Gaming PC
Author: Paul Henningsen

by Paul Henningsen May 27, 2009 at 1:00 AM

149 Comments

Case, Power Supply, And Optical Drive

Case: SilverStone Sugo SG01-BF

The SilverStone Sugo SG01-F improves upon the original SG01 by allowing use of extended-length expansion cards that are up to 12” long. It’s designed for Micro-ATX motherboards and can house full-sized ATX power supplies.

Read Customer Reviews of SilverStone's SG01-BF

There are two external 5.25” drive bays and two internal 3.5” bays. Other features include steel construction, two 80 mm fans, and an aluminum front bezel with audio out and microphone connections, four USB 2.0 ports, and one FireWire port.

Power Supply: OCZ Fatal1ty OCZ550FTY 550 W

Read Customer Reviews of OCZ's Fatal1tyOCZ550FTY 550 W

While a modular PSU was a must for this system, we sure didn’t want to skimp on supplying enough clean power to our components. This affordable OCZ was perfect with 450 W and 12 V of power, an 80+ efficiency rating, and a quiet 120 mm exhaust fan. The red LED lighting provides a nice glow from behind, but is barely noticeable through the Silverstone SG01-F side vents.

Optical Drive: LITE-ON 22X DVD Burner SATA Model iHAS322-08

Read Customer Reviews of Lite-On's iHAS322-08 DVD Burner

With the OEM version out of stock, we chose the Lite-On iHAS322-08. This retail 22X DVD burner was amazingly quiet and provided the second SATA cable we needed for our build. Also included for a few extra dollars are a beige face-plate and Nero 7 Essentials software.

Previous Next

Summary

About the author

Paul Henningsen

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject

Title
Title
Subject

This thread is closed for comments

149 comments

Comment from the forums

Your comment

Top Comments

dirtmountain 8 years ago

It is a lovely build, but the all around performance would be better with a Phenom2 x3 720, something that was achievable at the typical $625- $650 budget build price tag. If you look at the last 4 budget builds you get a E5200, E5300, E7300 and now yet another E5200. Give us a break, is the next one going to feature the E6300, then another E5200? As for the enthusiast, we get an i7, then a core2 duo, then a core2 quad, now another i7. Is it all around performance? or gaming performance? or just Intel performance? How can any reader know how the AMDs will stand up in these marathons if they never get the chance? With the new quarterly offering of the SBM it will be 3 months before another series comes out, just in time to see yet another i7, i5 and the E6300 builds. It's not as if the people waiting and wanting to see an AMD build are any surprise to Toms SBM or that they're disappointed to see AMD excluded once again. I'm disappointed myself even though Pauls build is a really nice one.
IronRyan21 8 years ago

Im sad, I was hoping for at least one AMD cpu in the May SBM series.
presidenteody 8 years ago

well, I hope Intel hasn't purchased tom's hardware yet.

Other Comments

doomtomb 8 years ago

You still manage to fit this PC with a GTX series at such a low price point. Props for that.
IzzyCraft 8 years ago

Yeah while you generally can find a 4890 10 dollars cheaper then a GTX275 the reverse is true when it comes to a 4870 and GTX260.

Interesting i would have thought you would have went with a kuma due to limited oc ability in a cramped "gaming box", although you did make the oc worth while.

I understand the rest of the build; though the case looks more like a media box then a gaming box those cramped boxes amaze and worry me as even my htpc is very well cooled and silent due to being very low heat as in not a oced cpu and a power hungry gpu.
IronRyan21 8 years ago

Im sad, I was hoping for at least one AMD cpu in the May SBM series.
IzzyCraft 8 years ago

62 dollar mobo hard to argue with that cpu+mobo coming out to be 62+70=$132 and, getting that much oc off the stock cooler.
dirtmountain 8 years ago

What a shame.
cinergy 8 years ago

IronRyan21Im sad, I was hoping for at least one AMD cpu in the May SBM series.

Green eyed Tom gives no mercy for DAAMIT.
cangelini 8 years ago

Wow, no love for a solid build. Nicely done, Paul.
erdinger 8 years ago

dissapointed also just needed to see an Amd system.
dirtmountain 8 years ago

It is a lovely build, but the all around performance would be better with a Phenom2 x3 720, something that was achievable at the typical $625- $650 budget build price tag. If you look at the last 4 budget builds you get a E5200, E5300, E7300 and now yet another E5200. Give us a break, is the next one going to feature the E6300, then another E5200? As for the enthusiast, we get an i7, then a core2 duo, then a core2 quad, now another i7. Is it all around performance? or gaming performance? or just Intel performance? How can any reader know how the AMDs will stand up in these marathons if they never get the chance? With the new quarterly offering of the SBM it will be 3 months before another series comes out, just in time to see yet another i7, i5 and the E6300 builds. It's not as if the people waiting and wanting to see an AMD build are any surprise to Toms SBM or that they're disappointed to see AMD excluded once again. I'm disappointed myself even though Pauls build is a really nice one.
sandoness 8 years ago

Gah.. wouldn't it be smart to get a more powerful cpu?

even with the overclocking power of this one?

I was originally gonna get a q9550 !?
justjc 8 years ago

The explanation we have heard earlier, for he use of only Intel CPUs, is that Tom's Hardware base their builds on what hardware they have available. Why they don't have the money for a single Phenom II in their budget I don't know.

The reason could offcause be that Intel gives a hefty rebate/will only deliver free chips, if AMD is left out of the builds, after all they have a history of such dealings (see rulings from the EU, Japan and South Korea)

Perhaps we should start a collection and buy Tom's Hardware a couple of Phenom IIs, at least that would show if availability, of AMD CPUs, is the issue.
presidenteody 8 years ago

well, I hope Intel hasn't purchased tom's hardware yet.
manitoublack 8 years ago

Next SBM all the same price points, but 2 systems at each price-point. 1 AMD the other Intel. Settle it once and for all I know Tom's has spare cash. I'd guess you'd need to use the same graphics cards at each price-point, for a fair comparison.

Another odd point is that after giving major props to the R770 in X-Fire for it's great value, to see that solution missing in a value shootout. That said space and X-fire compatibility was obviously an issue.

Another great build, and look forward to seeing Junes take on value.
cangelini 8 years ago

justjcThe explanation we have heard earlier, for he use of only Intel CPUs, is that Tom's Hardware base their builds on what hardware they have available. Why they don't have the money for a single Phenom II in their budget I don't know. The reason could offcause be that Intel gives a hefty rebate/will only deliver free chips, if AMD is left out of the builds, after all they have a history of such dealings (see rulings from the EU, Japan and South Korea)Perhaps we should start a collection and buy Tom's Hardware a couple of Phenom IIs, at least that would show if availability, of AMD CPUs, is the issue.

The way this works is simple. We cooperate with Newegg to make each System Builder Marathon happen. We have a budget and buy all of the hardware in each of these straight from Newegg. Most of the time, the configurations are selected based on feedback from the forums. We have something coming up next week for the folks who'd like to see some more AMD overclocking. But for this series, the Intel processors and Nvidia cards made the most sense given our respective price points.
anamaniac 8 years ago

Nice build.

Micro-ATX for the win!

A full size tower just wouldn't work for me. I have my cramped micro in a situation were it's already too big.
Though I may go for a full-atx, and get a 10 foot mouse/keyboard/DVI/speaker cables, and throw it in my closet.

I'd like to see the cheapest gaming computer you cuold do and the performance though.
Say, a AMD 5050e (for lower power consumption than kuma), micro atx, 4770 (over 4830 for power consumption), 250GB hdd etc.
See how much muscle it has, how much power it uses, and how quiet you can make it. (extreme budget water cooling guide maybe?)
I know I'd be interested in the results of that build, because rent is just too much.

Thanks Toms.
kelfen 8 years ago

what about the 4770 for the win?
cangelini 8 years ago

Because these systems come from actual retail orders, we rely on hardware being available in order for it to appear here. The 4770 is not a good candidate.
Proximon 8 years ago

The best build of the bunch. That's a whole lot of value for 600 bucks.
The only nit I have to pick is that the OCZ 550W is untested and possibly an inferior PSU, even for OCZ. It's larger sibling is decent, but it's clearly built by a different OEM. I doubt it's a BAD PSU though. Not like the junk a certain other site allows in their builds.
obarthelemy 8 years ago

On the $600 system, do you feel the performance is limited by the CPU, or by the vidcard ? I'm looking into getting a new PC, for around $800-900, and I was wondering if I should put a bit more money in the vidcard or the cpu (I'm getting bigger HD's for sure).
Sihastru 8 years ago

I know it's not in the budget, but for a build like this, I would go with the Silverstone SG-05 (with the bundled SFX PSU, very few choices there), Zotac 9300 mini-ITX WiFi, and keep the rest of the components with maybe the exception of the HDD where I only have eyes for the 640GB Western Digitals (Blue or Black, no green nonsense for me)...

Now that would be impressively small and yet powerful.