Core i5-3570K, -3550, -3550S, And -3570T: Ivy Bridge Efficiency
After recommending Sandy Bridge last year, we weren't particularly impressed by the new Ivy Bridge-based Core i7-3770K as an upgrade. But are Intel's more mainstream third-gen Core i5 processors any more attractive? We grab four models to find out.
Benchmark Results: SiSoft Sandra 2012
In a diagnostic like Sandra 2012, Hyper-Threading gives the two Core i7s a clear advantage, even though they’re not running all that much faster than the next-lowest finisher, Core i5-3570K. From there, optimizations for power affect performance on a fairly gradual scale.
The effects are similar in the Multi-Media module, where the two Core i7s achieve superior integer and floating-point performance.
Intel has a habit off stripping off features from lower-end SKUs, and we’ve seen AES-NI serve as one of those differentiators that Intel drops. Fortunately, the Core i5s all retain their hardware-accelerated AES, so each contender achieves performance in-line with memory bandwidth.
And as we might have guessed from the Cryptography result, all of our numbers are fairly even (as we’d expect from a common memory controller operating at a consistent data rate).
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: SiSoft Sandra 2012
Prev Page Benchmark Results: PCMark 7 Next Page Benchmark Results: Adobe CS 5.5 And Content Creation
