Core i5-3570K, -3550, -3550S, And -3570T: Ivy Bridge Efficiency
After recommending Sandy Bridge last year, we weren't particularly impressed by the new Ivy Bridge-based Core i7-3770K as an upgrade. But are Intel's more mainstream third-gen Core i5 processors any more attractive? We grab four models to find out.
Benchmark Results: Media Encoding
A single-threaded metric, Lame naturally reflects the best performance from the highest-clocked, most efficient architecture. But because Turbo Boost pushes these CPUs so fast when only a single thread is active, they mostly turn in very similar results. Only the lower-clocked Core i5-3570T lags behind.
The same story applies to iTunes, another single-threaded app. Slight tweaks to the Ivy Bridge architecture even allow a couple of Core i5s to outperform Core i7-2700K.
Once we switch over to a more threading-optimized test, the results fall back to what we saw in the content creation apps: Hyper-Threading gives the Core i7s a nice little boost, while the quad-core i5s file into place accordingly. Again, the only chip that lags back is the Core i5-3570T.
HandBrake tells us a similar story.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Media Encoding
Prev Page Benchmark Results: File Compression Next Page Benchmark Results: 3DMark 11
