Page 1:AMD's FX-6100 Gets Its Big Chance
Page 2:CPU, Motherboard, And Cooler
Page 3:Video Cards, Power Supply, And Case
Page 4:Memory, Hard Drive, And Optical Drive
Page 5:Assembly And Overclocking
Page 6:Test System And Benchmarks
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Synthetics
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Media Encoding
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 10:Benchmark Results: Crysis And Just Cause 2
Page 11:Benchmark Results: F1 2010 And Metro 2033
Page 12:Power And Temperature Benchmarks
Page 13:FX-6100: A Surprising Processor Bottleneck
Benchmark Results: Synthetics
Let’s start with 3DMark 11. This is where we're most likely to see two Radeon HD 6950s in CrossFire distinguish themselves from the GeForce combination.
The new FX-based PC shows an advantage at higher resolutions and graphics loads thanks to its beefy GPUs. But, at entry-level settings, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU. Intel's Core i5-2500K and Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460 SLI configuration take a slight win.
PCMark clearly favors the Intel-based system, and even the overclocked 4.5 GHz FX-6100 cannot match the stock Core i5-2500K's results.
The Intel box has a clear advantage, but the new FX-6100 has one win in the Double x4 iSSE2 Multimedia CPU benchmark.
Note: AMD’s memory bandwidth is clear here, but this is more of an issue with the older version of Sandra we're using for this comparison. We're currently upgrading our benchmark suite, and will update these results in the next system builder marathon.
- AMD's FX-6100 Gets Its Big Chance
- CPU, Motherboard, And Cooler
- Video Cards, Power Supply, And Case
- Memory, Hard Drive, And Optical Drive
- Assembly And Overclocking
- Test System And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: Synthetics
- Benchmark Results: Media Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Crysis And Just Cause 2
- Benchmark Results: F1 2010 And Metro 2033
- Power And Temperature Benchmarks
- FX-6100: A Surprising Processor Bottleneck