Seven GeForce GTX 670 Cards, Benchmarked And Reviewed

The Speeds And Feeds

As you can see, Nvidia's reference design on the far right is the only board in this round-up based on that design. Everyone else used different coolers, core clock rates, and, in a few cases, memory clock rates.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 Asus Gainward Galaxy Palit Gigabyte Zotac Nvidia
CUDA Cores 1344
Texture Units 112
ROPs 32
GPU Clock 1059 MHz 1006 MHz 1006 MHz 1006 MHz 980 MHz 1098 MHz 915 MHz
Boost Clock 1137 MHz 1085 MHz 1085 MHz 1085 MHz 1059 MHz 1167 MHz 980 MHz
Pixel Fill Rate 29.7 GPix/s 28.2 GPix/s 28.2 GPix/s 28.2 GPix/s 27.4 GPix/s 30.7 GPix/s 25.6 GPix/s
Texture Fill Rate 118.6 GTex/s 112.7 GTex/s 112.7 GTex/s 112.7 GTex/s 109.8 GTex/s 123 GTex/s 102.5 GTex/s
Memory Clock 1502 MHz 1527 MHz 1502 MHz 1527 MHz 1502 MHz 1652 MHz 1502 MHz
Memory Bus 256-bit
Memory Bandwidth 192.3 GB/s 195.5 GB/s 192.3 GB/s 195.5 GB/s 192.3 GB/s 211.5 GB/s 192.3 GB/s
Memory 2 GB GDDR5
Die Size 294 mm²
Transistors 3.54 Billion
Power Connectors 6 + 6-pin 6 + 6-pin 8 + 6-pin 6 + 6-pin 8 + 6-pin 6 + 6-pin 6 + 6-pin
Street Price $430 Not Available $440 Not Available $400 $440 $400

Pricing and Availability

It's difficult to keep a sharp bead on graphics card prices; they move every day, it seems. The best we could do here was check availability the day before this story went live in the U.S. and take a quick snapshot of the prices.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Nobody seems to have the Gainward or Palit cards in stock, meaning they're really only here for exhibition, since you can't get your hands on them even if you wanted to. One of the other models currently sells for the same $400 Nvidia charges for its reference design, while the other three cost notably more. We're just happy that the GeForce GTX 670 launch wasn't a predominantly paper-oriented affair like GeForce GTX 680, with miniscule quantities trickling out from Nvidia's board partners. Many of these models appear to be readily available, in contrast.

Igor Wallossek
Contributor

Igor Wallossek wrote a wide variety of hardware articles for Tom's Hardware, with a strong focus on technical analysis and in-depth reviews. His contributions have spanned a broad spectrum of PC components, including GPUs, CPUs, workstations, and PC builds. His insightful articles provide readers with detailed knowledge to make informed decisions in the ever-evolving tech landscape

  • LonelyMan
    Where is the msi gtx 670 power edition?
    Reply
  • zerokontrol
    Typo on conclusion. "not to loud on loud." That would be the Gigabyte card.
    Reply
  • user 18
    On the Gigabyte card's page:

    During the course of our testing, we effortlessly set this card to run at 1059 MHz, so we're not sure why Gigabyte held back so much. During testing, we overclocked this card to 1059 MHz quite easily, so we are somewhat surprised by the conservative factory overclock.

    This seems to be saying the same thing twice. Error, or am I missing something?
    Reply
  • hellfire24
    hey man,where's MSi Twinfrozer IV OC edition?
    Reply
  • FormatC
    10445301 said:
    Where is the msi gtx 670 power edition?
    The roundup was published in German on May 22, 2012:
    http://www.tomshardware.de/Nvidia-Geforce-GTX-670-Roundup,testberichte-241027.html

    Sorry, but at this time (and 4 weeks later too) MSI was unable to deliver one of this cards. When MSI starts so late with this cards, then this is not our fault. ;)
    Reply
  • monkeymonk
    Please do this with the 680s
    Reply
  • user 18
    Also, the second chart on the 'Sound Level and Temperature: Overclocked' page is missing the 'Mhz' label on the speed for the Palit card. It should read '1059 Mhz', while it reads only '1059'.
    Reply
  • LonelyMan
    I'd like to see one for the 680s too, in which the 680 classified and lightning will be present, including others. :D
    Reply
  • hellfire24
    please also do battlefield 3 benchmark!
    Reply
  • erunion
    I've been waiting for this review.
    Reply