Trending

GeForce GTX 760 Review: GK104 Shows Up (And Off) At $250

By ,

With its last graphics card introduction until the end of Fall, Nvidia isn't trying to impress anyone with groundbreaking performance. Rather, the company is pulling better-than GeForce GTX 660 Ti-class frame rates to a $250 price point, creating value.

MSI GTX 760 OC Gaming

MSI’s GTX 760 OC Gaming (N760 TF 2GD5/OC) is equipped with the same TwinFrozr IV cooler introduced with the GTX 770 OC Gaming and Lightning cards. Like Gigabyte's offering, a slim thermal solution makes the GTX 760 OC Gaming a good choice for an SLI setup, leaving about 0.4 inches between the cards. At 11.81 inches, it is about 0.8 inches longer than its competition, though it also weighs a little less at 26.1 ounces. The MSI card is also the slowest of the factory-overclocked cards, running at 1020 MHz.

Technical Specifications And Dimensions
GPU-Clock1020 MHz
Boost (according to BIOS)1085 MHz
Attainable Maximum Boost Under Load1163 MHz
Height125 mm / 4.92 inches
Length300 mm / 11.81 inches
Width (Cooler Side)36 mm / 1.42 inches (<= double-slot)
Width (PCB side)4 mm / 0.16 inches (no backplate, frame only)
max. Weight742 g / 26.2 ounces
Fans2 x 92 mm / 3.62 inches (fan diameter)

A single, extended sink dissipates the GPU’s heat, which is drawn away using two 8 mm and three 6 mm copper pipes. RAM and VRMs receive their own dedicated cooling courtesy of a massive frame that provides sufficient airflow.

One 6- and one 8-pin auxiliary power connector sit atop the PCB, along with two SLI interfaces.

The horizontally-aligned cooling fins push exhaust out of the card's back side into your case and through a half-slot grille cut into the I/O bracket. A DVI port consumes the other half of that slot space.

MSI’s card offers the same connectivity as Nvidia's reference design, namely dual-link DVI-I, dual-link DVI-D, HDMI, and DisplayPort.

142 Comments Comment from the forums
  • toddybody 25 June 2013 13:17
    Damn I love nVidia
    Reply
  • SiliconWars 25 June 2013 13:18
    This doesn't look faster than the 7950 boost to me. Maybe you should check your scores and update your conclusion to reflect reality?
    Reply
  • TheBigTroll 25 June 2013 13:28
    it isnt supposed to be faster than the 7950. they are about the same
    Reply
  • pauldh 25 June 2013 13:37
    11035777 said:
    This doesn't look faster than the 7950 boost to me. Maybe you should check your scores and update your conclusion to reflect reality?

    Re-read the conclusion in question below. He doesn't say it is faster, he says this card will replace Don's recommendation for best $250 card and displace the 7950 Boost. ie. Don won't be recommending a $300 card that trades blows or barely beats a $250 card. If both were to end up $250, things change.

    quote - "A quick reference to Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June 2013 shows that Don is currently recommending the Tahiti-based Radeon HD 7870 for $250. With almost certainty, the GeForce GTX 760 will take that honor next month, displacing the Radeon HD 7950 with Boost at $300 in the process."
    Reply
  • mapesdhs 25 June 2013 13:44
    Chris, what is it about the GTX 580 that makes it so slow for the CUDA Fluidmark
    test, given it does so well for the other CUDA tests, especially iRay and Blender?

    Btw, I don't suppose you could include 580 SLI results for the game tests? ;)
    Or do you have just the one 580?


    My only gripe with the 760 is the misuse of a model number which allows one to
    infer it should be quicker than older cards with 'lesser' names (660, etc.) when
    infact it's often slower. I really wish NVIDIA would stop releasing products that
    exhibit such enormous performance overlap. Given the evolutionary nature of
    GPUs, and the time that has passed since the 600s launched, one might
    reasonably expect a 760 to beat the 670 too, but it never does. To me, the
    price drop is the only thing it has going for it. The endless meddling with shader
    numbers, clocks, bus width, etc., creates an utter muddle of performance
    response depending on the game. One really has to judge based on the
    individual game rather than any general product description or spec summary.
    I just hope Skyrim players with 660s don't upgrade on the assumption newer
    model names mean better performance, but I expect some will.

    Ian.

    Reply
  • tomfreak 25 June 2013 13:49
    GTX760 is an upgrade for GTX460/560 user and of all of that u didnt throw in those cards to bench with. Seriously?
    Reply
  • Novuake 25 June 2013 13:51
    Nice review as per usual Chris.
    Amazing performance at 250$. The 265bit memory interface does wonders for GK104.

    Now I am wondering if there will even be a GTX760ti, while there is a large enough gap in the product stack, I have a feeling there is a chance there may not be a "ti" version.
    Anyone know more?
    Reply
  • sarinaide 25 June 2013 14:02
    AMD will have to release a new interim Radeon series, the existing family is not to outdated to be stretched to much longer.
    Reply
  • Mousemonkey 25 June 2013 14:10
    For those of us who fold it ain't no show stopper is it? :lol:
    Reply
  • horaciopz 25 June 2013 14:12
    So, maybe there will be an GTX 760 ti, for about 300 bucks with the peformance of a GTX 670... Uh? nVidia really should. This remembers the gtx 400 series and 500 series... nVidia is doing it all over again.
    Reply