Our standard benchmarks and power tests are performed using the CPU’s stock frequencies (including stock PBO), with all power-saving features enabled. Optimized defaults are set in the BIOS and the memory is set using the XMP profiles. For this baseline testing, Windows is set to High Performance, before we switch over to Balanced during power testing, so the PC idles properly.
Synthetics are a great tool to figure out if a board is running out of spec, as identical settings should produce similar performance results. Advanced memory timings are the one place where motherboard makers can still optimize for either stability or performance, though, and those settings can impact some testing.
In our synthetic benchmarks, the Aorus Master performed well in most tests, with its results mixing in with the other boards we’ve tested so far. All results were within the expected range.
Our timed applications show the Aorus Master is right up there with the other boards. In the Corona benchmark, it was one second off the fastest time, while it was average in LAME and Handbrake tests.
3D Games and 3DMark
We’ve recently updated our game tests to The Division 2 and Forza Horizon 4. The games are run at 1920x1080 resolution using the Ultra preset. As the resolution goes up, the CPU tends to have less of an impact and most games at this resolution in the first place. The goal with these settings is to determine if there are differences in performance at the most commonly used resolution with settings most people use, or at least strive for.
In both 3DMark tests and the games, the Aorus Master’s performance landed where expected, close to most other comparable results. There’s really nothing exceptional either way here.
Power Consumption / VRM Temperatures
For power testing, we used AIDA64’s System Stability Test with Stress CPU, FPU and Cache enabled, using the peak power consumption value. The wattage reading is taken from the wall via a Kill-A-Watt meter to capture the entire ecosystem. The only variable that changes is the motherboard; all other parts are the same.
The B550 Aorus Master idled at 49W (the lowest of the group so far), jumping to 210W under load at the wall. The actual peak load wattage for the CPU, according to HWInfo64, was 141W. Unlike the Intel systems, the difference between the boards and wattage used wasn’t much. That said, with the recent news coming out that some AMD motherboards are misrepresenting power use for more performance, take this with a grain of salt. Our next set of reviews will capture this new value in Hwinfo, so we can better see exactly how each board behaves.
For VRM testing, the Aorus Master did well, with the VRMs running well within operating parameters at stock and while overclocked. During stock operation, the VRMs peaked at 46 degrees Celsius and while overclocked, they reached 48 degrees Celsius. These temperatures are the lowest out of the B550 boards tested at this time.
There are several ways to overclock on AMD platforms, depending on your goals. If your focus is single-threaded performance, you may want to focus on using Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) and adjusting its parameters. If you can use all cores and threads, setting a manual CPU multiplier and voltage is likely the better route. While the latter clips peak single-threaded performance a bit, it increases all core/thread performance from base. To that end, we use 4.3 GHz and 1.35V for an all core/thread overclock.
The B550 Aorus Master handled the 12c/24t Ryzen 9 3900X without issue. The VRMs were kept cool throughout testing showing no signs of stress.
On the memory side, we know AMD is limited to around 3600/3733 MHz when keeping FCLK at a 1:1 ratio with the memory. With this in mind, for memory testing, we add two more sticks and run 4x8GB at DDR4 3600, which is AMD’s current sweet spot. With that, our Aorus Master had no issues running DDR4 3600 with 4x8GB sticks.
AMD’s mainstream chipset has officially landed, and Gigabyte’s B550 Aorus Master proved to be quite the board to start with. Priced at $279.99 (MSRP) it’s one of the most expensive B550 boards, but it does bring with it a host of premium features, including 2.5 GbE LAN, Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200, Realtek ALC1220-VB audio and power delivery fit for X570-based motherboards.
If you are a user who needs a lot of USB ports, the Aorus Master has you covered, with 12 on the rear IO. We don’t see a USB 3.2 Gen2 (20 Gbps) port, but the several 10 Gbps ports are good enough for most users. With three M.2 slots and six SATA ports, there is plenty in the way of internal storage as well.
Performance results were as expected, with nothing out of line. Overclocking all cores and threads on our 3900X to 4.3 GHz was a breeze, with the 16-phase VRM handling our testing without issue or scorching our fingertips. On top of this, the board looks good and will fit in with most build themes.
Pricing on B550 boards has been kept closer to the vest with B550 than in most launches, but we expect this board to directly compete with the Asus ROG Strix B500-E Gaming, ASRock B550 Taichi, and MSI’s MPG Gaming Pro Carbon Wi-Fi, which all have similar features.
While there are plenty of cheaper B550 based options, if you’re looking at flagship mainstream parts, you likely already know that you are set with a single GPU and PCIe 4.0 M.2 module. While you can add more modules, speed is limited to PCIe 3.0 speeds (plenty fast enough for many) in most cases. If you’re still a heavy SATA-based storage user and six isn’t enough, look at the Taichi. If you need three M.2 slots, the Aorus Master delivers.
In the end, the Aorus Master is a very capable board, loaded up with premium features. It’s one of the more well-appointed compared to similarly priced B550 motherboards, though it comes at a premium price as well. If a $250+ B550-based motherboard is what you’re looking for, the B550 Aorus Master should be on your shortlist.
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: All Motherboard Content