Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 (15-inch) Review: No Better Blues

A great (if stale) design gets Alder Lake and Thunderbolt 4, but it’s not much of an upgrade from the (now much cheaper) Surface Laptop 4.

Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 (15-inch)
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Microsoft’s now Intel-only Surface Laptop 5 still looks and feels very good, but ditching AMD has resulted in substantially worse battery life in our testing, in exchange for a single Thunderbolt 4 port and performance that’s not substantially improved.

Pros

  • +

    Sleek, solid design

  • +

    Very good keyboard and 3:2 display

  • +

    Now includes (one) Thunderbolt 4

Cons

  • -

    Loses three hours of battery life over previous model

  • -

    Performance isn’t much improved

  • -

    Still too few ports

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Microsoft's Surface Pro 9 2-in-1 is now available with either an Arm or an Intel CPU. But the 15-inch Surface Laptop 5 clamshell is now all 12th Gen Intel, all the time, jettisoning the AMD-based option in the previous-gen Surface Laptop 4, which spent a long time on our Best Ultrabooks and Premium Laptops list. The shift to the latest mobile Intel silicon also brings support for Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 via the laptop's sole USB-C port for the first time.

But aside from a new light green sage color in the smaller 13.5-inch model (we’re testing the 15-inch model here), the Surface Laptop 5 is effectively the same device on the outside as the Surface Laptop 4 (and 2019’s Surface Laptop 3, for that matter). In many ways, that’s fine given that the all-aluminum, 0.58-inch, 3.4-pound shell still looks and feels great, like an edgier version of Apple’s MacBook Air, at least in our silver “platinum” review unit (black is the other option). The keyboard and 2496 x 1664 touchscreen are still good, although the 720p webcam is starting to feel very dated for a laptop that starts at $1,299 ($1,899 as tested). 

The real issue, though, is that without any real change on the outside, this latest Surface Laptop lives and dies on its performance and battery life. And as we’ll see later in testing, the Intel i7-1265U in our review unit doesn’t exactly excite, especially given a similarly configured (and identically designed) AMD-powered Surface Laptop 4 got better battery life in our testing and is still available for hundreds less.

Matt Safford
Managing Editor

After a rough start with the Mattel Aquarius as a child, Matt built his first PC in the late 1990s and ventured into mild PC modding in the early 2000s. He’s spent the last 15 years covering emerging technology for Smithsonian, Popular Science, and Consumer Reports, while testing components and PCs for Computer Shopper, PCMag and Digital Trends.

  • brandonjclark
    It loses THREE HOURS of battery life over SP4?

    OMG, that's horrible.
    Reply
  • ibm650
    Wore, the battery is not replaceable, glued to screen
    Reply
  • That’s what you get within intel processors

    Inefficiency. What a JOKE
    Reply
  • prtskg
    So Intel is undercutting AMD by enough margin that it's worth losing 3hrs of battery life but not having AMD option? Ryzen 6000s would have been so good too. Is Intel giving extra benefit for not using AMD 6000s? 🤔
    Reply