NVIDIA GeForceFX 5600 Ultra & FX 5200 Ultra: Performance

by

8x Anisotropic Filtering

Here, we tested the speed of anisotropic filtering. The two manufacturers use different optimizations, so a direct comparison is difficult. The quality tests at the beginning of the article show ATi at an advantage, though.

UT 2003: 8x Aniso Quality

Settings: NVIDIA - Balanced; ATi - Quality.

The situation is similar to that with FSAA. The FX 5600 Ultra defeats the Radeon 9500 board, but loses to the 9500 PRO.

Previous Next
Summary
  1. Introduction
  2. Unanswered Questions
  3. Test Setup
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Antalus Botmatch
  6. Splinter Cell
  7. Splinter Cell Minimum FPS, Continued
  8. Aquanox
  9. Serious Sam: Second Encounter
  10. Serious Sam: Second Encounter Minimum FPS, Continued
  11. 3D Mark 2001 SE
  12. 3D Mark 2001 Detail Tests
  13. Fillrate Multi Texturing
  14. Vertex Shader Speed
  15. Pixel Shader Speed
  16. 3D Mark 2003
  17. 3D Mark 2003 Detail Tests
  18. Fillrate Tests
  19. Shader Tests
  20. Codecreatures
  21. Codecreatures Avg. # Of Polygons, Continued
  22. Image Quality
  23. 8x Anisotropic Filtering
  24. UT 2003: 8x Aniso Performance
  25. 4x FSAA + 8x Anisotropic Filtering
  26. UT 2003: 4x FSAA & 8x Aniso Performance
  27. Conclusion
About the author
Lars Weinand
Read more
Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
No comments yet
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
Most Popular
  1. Strike Force: The new ATI Radeon 9800, 9600 and 9200 Series
  2. VapoChill Puts a Pentium 4 with 800 MHz FSB within Reach
  3. Benchmark Marathon: 65 CPUs from 100 MHz to 3066 MHz
The Latest On Tom's Hardware
Edition
Subscribe to our newsletter
Company
Resources
Other Purch sites
  • © 2018 Purch All Rights Reserved.