NVIDIA GeForceFX 5600 Ultra & FX 5200 Ultra: Performance
-
Page 1:Introduction
-
Page 2:Unanswered Questions
-
Page 3:Test Setup
-
Page 4:Benchmarks
-
Page 5:Antalus Botmatch
-
Page 6:Splinter Cell
-
Page 7:Splinter Cell Minimum FPS, Continued
-
Page 8:Aquanox
-
Page 9:Serious Sam: Second Encounter
-
Page 10:Serious Sam: Second Encounter Minimum FPS, Continued
-
Page 11:3D Mark 2001 SE
-
Page 12:3D Mark 2001 Detail Tests
-
Page 13:Fillrate Multi Texturing
-
Page 14:Vertex Shader Speed
-
Page 15:Pixel Shader Speed
-
Page 16:3D Mark 2003
-
Page 17:3D Mark 2003 Detail Tests
-
Page 18:Fillrate Tests
-
Page 19:Shader Tests
-
Page 20:Codecreatures
-
Page 21:Codecreatures Avg. # Of Polygons, Continued
-
Page 22:Image Quality
-
Page 23:8x Anisotropic Filtering
-
Page 24:UT 2003: 8x Aniso Performance
-
Page 25:4x FSAA + 8x Anisotropic Filtering
-
Page 26:UT 2003: 4x FSAA & 8x Aniso Performance
-
Page 27:Conclusion
Antalus Botmatch
In the botmatch test, the 5600 Ultra loses to the Ti 4200 and the Radeon 9500 PRO, but it beats the non-PROs. Once more, the 5200 Ultra beats the Radeon 9000 PRO/ 9200.
Summary
- Introduction
- Unanswered Questions
- Test Setup
- Benchmarks
- Antalus Botmatch
- Splinter Cell
- Splinter Cell Minimum FPS, Continued
- Aquanox
- Serious Sam: Second Encounter
- Serious Sam: Second Encounter Minimum FPS, Continued
- 3D Mark 2001 SE
- 3D Mark 2001 Detail Tests
- Fillrate Multi Texturing
- Vertex Shader Speed
- Pixel Shader Speed
- 3D Mark 2003
- 3D Mark 2003 Detail Tests
- Fillrate Tests
- Shader Tests
- Codecreatures
- Codecreatures Avg. # Of Polygons, Continued
- Image Quality
- 8x Anisotropic Filtering
- UT 2003: 8x Aniso Performance
- 4x FSAA + 8x Anisotropic Filtering
- UT 2003: 4x FSAA & 8x Aniso Performance
- Conclusion
