An Introduction To The Major ARM-Based SoCs

Samsung's Exynos Line of SoCs

Unlike Qualcomm, Apple, and now Nvidia, Samsung doesn’t design its own CPUs. Instead, it licenses both the CPU and GPU logic from ARM. However, one advantage Samsung has is that it manufactures the chips itself, and doesn’t have to pay other foundries to do it.

Exynos Series

Samsung shipped its first Exynos (3) SoC in 2010 alongside its highly successful (at the time) Galaxy S smartphone. Exynos 3 came with a single-core 1 GHz Cortex-A8 CPU, which, at the time, was the only popular mobile processor in an Android device that wasn't a Snapdragon. Apple launched its iPhone 4 around the same time that also featured a Cortex-A8, though that one operated at 800 MHz.

A year later came the Exynos 4210, Samsung’s first dual-core chip, which appeared in the company's Galaxy S2. It included Mali-400 graphics, a part that went on to become quite popular in other devices.

Not long after, Samsung introduced the Exynos 4212 in its Galaxy Note with a host processing complex running 200 MHz faster and a GPU purportedly 50% quicker. The Note had a 1280x800 resolution, and of course that was quite a bit higher than the Galaxy S2's 800x480 screen, necessitating increased graphics processing.

In 2012, Samsung shipped its first quad-core chip, Exynos 4 Quad, inside the Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note 2 smartphones. It also used 20% less power than the previous-generation SoC, while retaining a quad-core Mali-400 GPU.

Towards the end of the year, Samsung began using the Exynos 5 Dual, based on Cortex-A15, in its Nexus 10 tablet. The processor was significantly more powerful even than the Exynos 4 Quad and had Mali-T604 graphics employing the new unified shader Midgard architecture. This chip was also used in the most popular Chromebook device at the time, helping the machine hit a low $250 price point, while offering respectable performance.

Exynos 5 Octa

In 2013, Samsung shipped its first eight-core chip for the Galaxy S4 and Galaxy Note 3. It was named Exynos 5 Octa, or Exynos 5410.

Exynos 5 Octa was the first SoC based on ARM's big.Little configuration, made of four-core Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15 CPU clusters able to work separately to save battery life or together for maximum performance.

The part ended up with several issues, many related to firmware. This wasn't surprising, given the technology's newness. Samsung’s engineers were still learning how to make the Cortex-A7s and -A15s work well together, in the most energy efficient way. Because of those problems, and because Qualcomm had better LTE modem integration in its SoC, Samsung continues using Snapdragon processors in most of its markets.

To make matters even more complicated, Samsung also stepped back to using PowerVR graphics for this SoC, instead of the Mali architecture. Presumably, it did that because ARM’s Mali-T628 wasn’t ready, giving the company no other choice.

This year, Samsung changed direction again and went back to Mali-T628MP6 graphics. It also seems to have fixed the issues with Exynos 5 Octa in a new Exynos 5422 version. The latest revision also sports a 300 MHz boost to its Cortex-A15 cores and an extra 100 MHz for the Cortex-A7 cores. Moreover, Samsung added a mode that makes all eight cores operate at the same time, when needed, rather than completely separate the two clusters.

  • de5_Roy
    tegra and zune!?! rofl!
    the stark soc seems to have vanished from the latest soc roadmap... wonder what happened to it....
    wonder why mediatek, allwinner left out of the "big players" while nvidia in nowhere on the "competitive landscape" or anything that qualifies as such. :pt1cable:
    Reply
  • therogerwilco
    Yay! ARM chips!
    Half the cost and half the performance!
    Reply
  • pierrerock
    Power efficient does not mean performance wise ...
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    14007665 said:
    the stark soc seems to have vanished from the latest soc roadmap... wonder what happened to it....
    The Starks have been dropping like flies. Maybe Nvidia got worried HBO would finish killing them off in the fifth season.
    Reply
  • adamovera
    tegra and zune!?! rofl!
    the stark soc seems to have vanished from the latest soc roadmap... wonder what happened to it....
    wonder why mediatek, allwinner left out of the "big players" while nvidia in nowhere on the "competitive landscape" or anything that qualifies as such. :pt1cable:
    Haven't heard peep about Stark for a very long time, but the followup article, scheduled for next week, focuses on lesser-known Chinese ARM-based SoCs ;)
    Reply
  • urbanman2004
    Tegra gives ARM a run for its money
    Reply
  • Jak Atackka
    I'm interested to see how well the Tegra K1 performs in market. It would be great if it was successful, because that will push Qualcomm and other manufacturers to develop more powerful chips as well. Competition benefits us consumers, and technology as a whole.

    As ARM chips become more powerful and x86 chips become more power efficient, it won't be long until the two of them meet. I'm curious to see which format will win that war. One thing's for sure, the next decade will be a very exciting time for mobile computing.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    14018982 said:
    I'm interested to see how well the Tegra K1 performs in market. It would be great if it was successful, because that will push Qualcomm and other manufacturers to develop more powerful chips as well. Competition benefits us consumers, and technology as a whole.
    The Shield Tablet murders its battery in just over two hours when its IGP gets pushed to its limits so I doubt the K1 will be particularly popular for products where small size and long battery life are priorities. If it does manage to succeed, it will be in larger devices that can accommodate larger batteries like Chromebooks and mobile devices specifically designed for mobile gamers.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    Tegra 4 was actually pretty powerful graphics wise. The problem is that it wasn't power efficient and thus got throttled when used in a smartphone. The Shield on the other hand actually lets it go full out, it's even got a small heatsink and airvents which do get hot after you've been using it for awhile. The K1 is similiar, it provides great visuals and is very powerful, but sucks power and generates heat doing so.
    Reply
  • Bulat Ziganshin
    everyone reports that 5433 will be 64-bit: http://www.droid-life.com/2014/08/20/galaxy-note-4-powered-by-64-bit-exynos-5433-benchmarked-only-beat-by-one-other-chipset/
    Reply