An Introduction To The Major ARM-Based SoCs

Qualcomm's Snapdragon Line of SoCs

Qualcomm is currently the biggest chip maker in the mobile market thanks to its popular Snapdragon brand.

Snapdragon Series

The first series of Snapdragon SoCs came equipped with the ARMv7-based Scorpion core, which was similar in performance and functionality to ARM's own Cortex-A8. However, because it arrived earlier (thanks to Qualcomm’s licensing of the ARMv7 architecture), the San Diego, California-based company dominated the space. Its Snapdragon branding also seemed to be more effective in winning mind share. The arrival of the first Snapdragon chips synchronizes well with Android's rapid ascent back in 2010.

We've seen three Scorpion-based processors: S1 with Adreno 200 graphics, S2 with the Adreno 205 GPU, and the dual-core S3 with Adreno 220 on-board.

In 2012, Qualcomm introduced a brand new custom processor core called Krait, which heralded large performance and efficiency improvements. The first incarnation of Krait was the dual-core S4 that came with an Adreno 225 engine. A cutting-edge ARM-based core and an early move to 28 nm manufacturing further entrenched Qualcomm in its leadership position. The S4 Play, Plus, Pro, and Prime followed in an expansion of the family to allow for a greater variety of models.

The year after, Qualcomm rebranded its portfolio, creating Snapdragon 200, 400, 600, and 800. Many of the SoCs previously belonging to the S4 line were re-categorized. Small changes, such as the introduction of LPDDR3 system memory, were made, too. 

Since then, we've seen a handful of incremental releases, including the Snapdragon 410 (December 2013) with four Cortex-A53 cores, the quad-core 602A, the 610 with hardware-based HEVC decode acceleration, an octa-core Snapdragon 615, an 801, 805, 808, and hexa-core 810, the latter three boasting next-gen Adreno graphics, too.

Snapdragon 801

The Snapdragon 801 is one of Qualcomm’s latest and greatest SoCs seeing real availability. It's currently shipping in smartphone flagships like Samsung's Galaxy S5, HTC's M8, Sony's Xperia Z2, and LG's G3.

Unfortunately, the 801 isn't a radical departure from the Snapdragon 800, and only has slight improvements in performance for its CPU and GPU. For instance, it runs at up to 2.45 GHz compared to the 800's peak of 2.26/2.36 GHz. Its Adreno 330 engine now runs at up to 578 MHz instead of 450 MHz, also.

Compared to the Snapdragon 800, the newer 801 also comes with support for faster eMMC 5.0 flash storage. Everything else remains mostly unchanged until the arrival of Snapdragon 805 later this year, which will come with Adreno 400-series graphics.

  • de5_Roy
    tegra and zune!?! rofl!
    the stark soc seems to have vanished from the latest soc roadmap... wonder what happened to it....
    wonder why mediatek, allwinner left out of the "big players" while nvidia in nowhere on the "competitive landscape" or anything that qualifies as such. :pt1cable:
    Reply
  • therogerwilco
    Yay! ARM chips!
    Half the cost and half the performance!
    Reply
  • pierrerock
    Power efficient does not mean performance wise ...
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    14007665 said:
    the stark soc seems to have vanished from the latest soc roadmap... wonder what happened to it....
    The Starks have been dropping like flies. Maybe Nvidia got worried HBO would finish killing them off in the fifth season.
    Reply
  • adamovera
    tegra and zune!?! rofl!
    the stark soc seems to have vanished from the latest soc roadmap... wonder what happened to it....
    wonder why mediatek, allwinner left out of the "big players" while nvidia in nowhere on the "competitive landscape" or anything that qualifies as such. :pt1cable:
    Haven't heard peep about Stark for a very long time, but the followup article, scheduled for next week, focuses on lesser-known Chinese ARM-based SoCs ;)
    Reply
  • urbanman2004
    Tegra gives ARM a run for its money
    Reply
  • Jak Atackka
    I'm interested to see how well the Tegra K1 performs in market. It would be great if it was successful, because that will push Qualcomm and other manufacturers to develop more powerful chips as well. Competition benefits us consumers, and technology as a whole.

    As ARM chips become more powerful and x86 chips become more power efficient, it won't be long until the two of them meet. I'm curious to see which format will win that war. One thing's for sure, the next decade will be a very exciting time for mobile computing.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    14018982 said:
    I'm interested to see how well the Tegra K1 performs in market. It would be great if it was successful, because that will push Qualcomm and other manufacturers to develop more powerful chips as well. Competition benefits us consumers, and technology as a whole.
    The Shield Tablet murders its battery in just over two hours when its IGP gets pushed to its limits so I doubt the K1 will be particularly popular for products where small size and long battery life are priorities. If it does manage to succeed, it will be in larger devices that can accommodate larger batteries like Chromebooks and mobile devices specifically designed for mobile gamers.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    Tegra 4 was actually pretty powerful graphics wise. The problem is that it wasn't power efficient and thus got throttled when used in a smartphone. The Shield on the other hand actually lets it go full out, it's even got a small heatsink and airvents which do get hot after you've been using it for awhile. The K1 is similiar, it provides great visuals and is very powerful, but sucks power and generates heat doing so.
    Reply
  • Bulat Ziganshin
    everyone reports that 5433 will be 64-bit: http://www.droid-life.com/2014/08/20/galaxy-note-4-powered-by-64-bit-exynos-5433-benchmarked-only-beat-by-one-other-chipset/
    Reply