Comparison: Factory-Overclocked Versus Reference Graphics
In order to set their products apart, third-party vendors take reference GPUs from AMD and Nvidia, then make their own tweaks to layout, cooling, and performance. We're comparing a tuned-up card from MSI to AMD's reference Radeon HD 5870 to measure value.
Graphics Cards And Configurations Compared
The baseline for this article is AMD’s Radeon HD 5870, which we're running at its default clock speeds and a maximum overclock without leaning on voltage tweaks. We did the same with MSI’s R5870 Lightning, using the factory-overclocked speed default instead of the AMD reference spec. Then we add another test run at the card's fastest stable overclock, again without modifying voltages.
We also added similar cards from two other vendors for a quick cross check, as we wanted to make sure that the overclocking results and benefits achieved during the testing are actually representative of factory-overclocked solutions. We used a Core i5-750 CPU at 4 GHz to provide sufficient processor horsepower, minimizing the likelihood of a platform-imposed bottleneck.
Graphics Cards | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manufacturer and GPU | Codename | Memory | GPU Clock | Shader | Mem Clock | SPs |
MSI R5870 Lightning TwinFrozr II OC (HD 5870) | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 925 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1315 MHz | 1600 |
MSI R5870 Lightning TwinFrozr II (HD 5870) | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 900 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1200 MHz | 1600 |
Asus Matrix 5870 P/2DIS/2GD5 (HD 5870) | Cypress | 2048 MB GDDR5 | 894 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1200 MHz | 1600 |
Gigabyte GV-R587SO-1GD (HD 5870) | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 950 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1250 MHz | 1600 |
Radeon HD 5870 OC | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 900 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1300 MHz | 1600 |
Radeon HD 5870 | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 850 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1200 MHz | 1600 |
Radeon HD 5850 | Cypress | 2048 MB GDDR5 | 725 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1000 MHz | 1440 |
Radeon HD 5850 | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 725 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1000 MHz | 1440 |
Radeon HD 5830 | Cypress | 1024 MB GDDR5 | 800 MHz | 5.0 | 4 x 1000 MHz | 1120 |
SPs = Stream Processors, Shader 5.0 = DirectX 11
Test Setup | |
---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i5 750 @ 4 GHz (21 x 190), Lynnfield, BIOS 1.26875 V, 45 nm, LGA 1156 |
Mainboard | Gigabyte P55A-UD7, PCIe 2.0, SATA 6 Gb/s, USB 3.0 |
Chipset | Intel P55 Express |
Memory | 2 x 2 GB DDR3, 2x570 MHz 7-7-7-19, OCZ3G2000LV4GK, PC3-16000 Golden Series |
Audio | Realtek ALC889 |
LAN | 2 x RTL8111D |
HDDs | SATA, Western Digital WD300HLFS, WD5000AAKS |
DVD | Gigabyte GO-D1600C |
Power Supply | Cooler Master RS-850-EMBA 850 Watt |
Drivers | |
Graphics Driver | ATI Catalyst 10.6 |
Operating System | Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit |
DirectX | 9, 10, and 11 |
Chipset Drivers | Intel 9.1.1 |
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Graphics Cards And Configurations Compared
Prev Page GPU Overclocking Is Half Of The Story Next Page Differences: Reference Versus Aftermarket-
rohitbaran Too less performance gain (4-5 FPS) for the too much extra price paid ($50-$70) along with too much increase in power consumption (30-40 W. Better to buy a reference card unless you want the best no matter what the price is.Reply -
Mark Heath I like the idea behind the article and I'm glad that there's been some testing done on it, but I don't really like the article itself.Reply
There are references to how much the reference card is overclocked by, but there is no clear section about it, you started off with some of the summary charts, instead of putting them after the initial tests and you kept switching what cards you were comparing, with less warning than I would like..
Plus there's that 2GB 5850. Is that really a 2GB 5850, or is it actually 2GB 5830, because it kept getting beaten by the 1GB 5850..
-
Onus When I buy a new GPU, I look for one who's reference clocks make it "good enough" as-is; but I do look for a better / quieter cooler.Reply -
mrhoshos96 great article but u should have compared the reference against the sapphire vapor-xReply -
Tesla1483 In order to their products apart, third-party vendors take reference GPUs...
I'm guessing they meant "In order to SET their products apart..."
Seriously, it's the first sentence in the article. Does no one proof read anything here? Isn't that like the first thing you learn when you want to become a writer? Sorry, rant over. -
youssef 2010 "This cooling concept works pretty well, as it not only provides effective graphics component cooling, but it also helps to remove warm air from the inside of your PC. "Reply
The reference 5870 has a vent on its side so, it doesn't completely remove the hot air from the case but recirculates a part of the hot air back into the case -
duk3 It's a 5850, look how close the framerates are.Reply
The amount of ram doesn't really matter at these resolutions. -
LLJones The cards just do not offer enough gain. If you can afford the overclock edition at a premium, then save up a little more and get the next card up or buy two of the next lower cards. The $1000+ dual 5870 from Asus shows what a complete waste of money some, not all, super OC cards are.Reply
Try this, put together a really really really premium card component wise, and then don't put any cooling on it. Let me decide what I am going to do for cooling and companies can save on packaging, shipping etc due to no cooler.
If your really aiming at the OC crowd and not just playing a game of marketing, then you know the first thing someone does is to rip off your factory cooler to replace it or at the very least put quality thermal compound on it.