AMD Phenom II X4: 45nm Benchmarked
Socket AM3 And DDR3 RAM
The Phenom II was developed for the AM2+ socket. Nevertheless, it remains backward-compatible with AM2 (as do other new AMD CPUs) and works well with DDR2 RAM. In a few months, AMD will be presenting an AM3 version of its Phenom II processor. This variant will work with faster DDR3 RAM, but to maintain backward compatibility with AM2 and AM2+ sockets, even this model will include a DDR2 RAM interface.
Support For DDR3 RAM And Socket AM3
The memory controller in the Phenom II supports DDR2 modules at clock rates of up to 1066 MHz. The upcoming AM3 model includes DDR3 support as well: at a minimum, AMD plans to support DDR3-1333 in this new offering. The following table provides an overview of the various Phenom models and their memory compatibilities.
Support | Phenom | Phenom II | Phenom II |
---|---|---|---|
Version | AM2+ | AM2+ | AM3 |
Memory Interface (s) | DDR2 | DDR2 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Sockets Supported | AM2, AM2+ | AM2, AM2+ | AM2, AM2+, AM3 |
The Future Belongs to the 880G Chipset with Socket AM3 for DDR3 Support
AMD plans to introduce the 880G chipset along with the AM3 version of the Phenom II processor. In addition to support for DDR3 RAM, this chipset will include a few other new functions as well. The northbridge will be equipped with a Radeon 4000-class graphics chip and be granted control over its own video RAM. This chipset also adds support for DirectX 10.1 and the UVD2.0 unified video decoder, which in turn provide hardware support for MPEG2, H.264, and VC1 processing. Through a switch to 55 nm technology, energy consumption is supposed to remain aggressive. This is also the first time the southbridge SB710 will come into play; it includes 12 USB 2.0 and six SATA ports with RAID capability. We’ve also been told to expect some 880G motherboards with support for first-generation Phenom processors, presumably built around the AM2+ socket.
Chipset | AMD 780G | AMD 880G |
---|---|---|
Codename | Cartwheel | Pisces |
Technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
DirectX | 10 | 10.1 |
Integrated Graphics | HD-3xxx series | HD-4xxx series |
Hybrid Graphics | Yes | Yes |
DVI | Yes | Yes |
HDMI | Yes | Yes |
DisplayPort | No | Yes |
UVD Video | 1.0: MPEG2 H.264 VC1 | 2.0: MPEG2 H.264 VC1 |
Southbridge | SB600, SB700 | SB710 |
SATA | 6 | 6 |
USB 2.0 | 12 | 12 |
USB 1.1 | 2 | 2 |
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Socket AM3 And DDR3 RAM
Prev Page Dragon Platform And Socket AM2+ Next Page Only 800 MHz and 0.992 V When Idle-
firedogevan why focus on the q6600... wouldn't the q9550 or 9650 be a more accurate comparison given their respective locations in the product lineup?Reply -
dechy Yeah, the price comparison table should of included a Q9550, which costs same as i7 920 but with the lower mobo/ram combo price.Reply
Ends up being the same price as the AMD bundle, but with a good more performance... there goes the whole "AMD price/performance" aspect of this chip. -
one-shot Great review. Maybe some overclocking later? There were some pretty high claims about its overclocking potential. I'll wait for AM3 before I retire my E6750.Reply -
The Q9xxx series would trump the PhenomII in all the categories listed above. THG, it was downright *criminal* to have not included the Yorkfield chips in your performance per dollar and performance per watt analysis.Reply
-
nashville hey bert/tom's:Reply
good write up: thought id comment on i7 watts:
"we measured the power consumption directly from the 12 volt rail that supplied the CPU", i read somewhere the only i7 core logic gets power from 12v rail, the uncore/cache part somewhere else. if this is true, you going to do another measurements? -
kirvinb I'm so happy to see Intel has some competetion. While these new processors are not mind blowing, they offer some decent performance at the price given. I am sure this will lower the price of the q9400 and q9550, which is exactly what I want to see. Maybe even the i7s price will lower and maybe we will be back in the good days..where intel and amd flipped sides of the powerhouse like every 6 months..!! Good Write Up..Reply -
jj463rd On the forums someone mentioned "why did they use DDR2-800 RAM when DDR2-1066 would give better performance for the Phenom II".Wouldn't this skew the benchmarks by a little bit (perhaps 2 to 3%)?Reply