AMD Phenom II X4: 45nm Benchmarked

Technical Details

In switching its production processes over from 65 nm to 45 nm, AMD was able to increase the transistor count in the chip core markedly, while reducing the surface area of the die from 285 mm2 down to 258mm2. Its overall device count went from roughly 450 million to 758 million.

Beyond simply shrinking the transistors in its Phenom II core, AMD made some notable silicon enhancements that, individually might not be game-changers, but cumulatively enable some of the performance and efficiency increases we'll be exploring further in this story. Most obvious is the 45 nm immersion lithography that minimizes current leakage. The L3 cache, which is up to 6 MB from 2 MB, is also two cycles faster than the previous generation's L3. 

In light of AMD's Cool'n'Quiet 3.0 enhancements, which introduce extra power states and slash idle power (more on that shortly), each core's L1 and L2 caches now flush into the shared L3 after the core enters a halt state, allowing lower speeds. Our sample quickly scaled down to 800 MHz during periods of inactivity.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Finally, improved brach prediction, bigger buffers, and optimizations to the way certain instructions execute also give Phenom II significant advantages over the older Phenom.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPU Model Athlon X2 Phenom Phenom II
Dimensions 230 mm2 285 mm2 258 mm2
Transistor Count 227 M 450 M 758

The following table compares technical details of processors from both AMD and Intel:

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 AMD Phenom AMD Phenom II Intel Core i7 Intel Core 2
Core Agena / Toliman Deneb Bloomfield Yorkfield / Wolfdale / Kentsfield / Conroe / Allendale
Manufacturing Process 65 nm 45 nm 45 nm 65 nm, 45 nm
Top Clock Speed 2.6 GHz 3.0 GHz 3.2 GHz 3.2 GHz
L1 Cache 64 + 64 KB 64 + 64 KB 32 + 32 KB 32 + 32 KB
L2 Cache 512 KB 512 KB 256 KB 4 MB
L3 Cache 2 MB 6 MB 8 MB N/A
Max Power (TDP) 140 W 125 W 136 W 136 W
CPU <-> Northbridge HyperTransport HyperTransport Quick Path Interconnect Front Side Bus
CPU <-> CPU HyperTransport HyperTransport Quick Path Interconnect Northbridge Internal
Max Clock 3.2 GHz (25.6 GB/s) 3.2 GHz (25.6 GB/s) 6.4 GT/s (12.8 GB/s) 400 MHz (12.8 GB/s)
Min Clock 800 MHz (6.4 GB/s) 800 MHz (6.4 GB/s) 4.8 GT/s (9.0 GB/s) 200 MHz (6.4 GB/s)
Reference Clock 200 MHz 200 MHz 133 MHz 400 MHz, 333 MHz, 266 MHz, 200 MHz
64-bit Support x86-64 x86-64 EM64T EM64T
Hyper-Threading N/A N/A Yes N/A
Multimedia Extensions MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE 4a MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE 4a MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE 4.2 MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1
Virtualization Pacifica Pacifica VT VT
Energy Saving Cool’n’Quiet Cool’n’Quiet 3.0 Enchanced Halt State (C1E), SpeedStep Enchanced Halt State (C1E), SpeedStep
Thermal Protection Thermal Diode Thermal Diode Thermal Monitor 2 Thermal Monitor 2
Virus Protection XD bit XD bit XD bit XD bit
Trusted Execution Presidio Presidio LaGrande Technology LaGrande Technology
Active Management No No iAMT2 (V-Pro) iAMT2 (V-Pro)
  • one-shot
    YAY!, The day has come! Haven't read it yet. I am excited to see what it brings!
    Reply
  • firedogevan
    why focus on the q6600... wouldn't the q9550 or 9650 be a more accurate comparison given their respective locations in the product lineup?
    Reply
  • dechy
    Yeah, the price comparison table should of included a Q9550, which costs same as i7 920 but with the lower mobo/ram combo price.

    Ends up being the same price as the AMD bundle, but with a good more performance... there goes the whole "AMD price/performance" aspect of this chip.
    Reply
  • one-shot
    Great review. Maybe some overclocking later? There were some pretty high claims about its overclocking potential. I'll wait for AM3 before I retire my E6750.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    Coming up soon one-shot--I was working on that one =)
    Reply
  • V3NOM
    who cares about performance/watt? PRICE/PERFORMANCE is the big deal
    Reply
  • The Q9xxx series would trump the PhenomII in all the categories listed above. THG, it was downright *criminal* to have not included the Yorkfield chips in your performance per dollar and performance per watt analysis.
    Reply
  • nashville
    hey bert/tom's:
    good write up: thought id comment on i7 watts:
    "we measured the power consumption directly from the 12 volt rail that supplied the CPU", i read somewhere the only i7 core logic gets power from 12v rail, the uncore/cache part somewhere else. if this is true, you going to do another measurements?
    Reply
  • kirvinb
    I'm so happy to see Intel has some competetion. While these new processors are not mind blowing, they offer some decent performance at the price given. I am sure this will lower the price of the q9400 and q9550, which is exactly what I want to see. Maybe even the i7s price will lower and maybe we will be back in the good days..where intel and amd flipped sides of the powerhouse like every 6 months..!! Good Write Up..
    Reply
  • jj463rd
    On the forums someone mentioned "why did they use DDR2-800 RAM when DDR2-1066 would give better performance for the Phenom II".Wouldn't this skew the benchmarks by a little bit (perhaps 2 to 3%)?
    Reply