Pentium M Models Compared
Processor Name | Architecture | Cache | Clock Speed | Front Side Bus |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium M processor 765 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 2.10 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor 755 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 2.0 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor 745 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 1.80 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor 735 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 1.70 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor 725 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 1.60 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor 715 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 1.50 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor 705 | 130 nm | 1 MB L2 | 1.50 GHz | 400 MHz |
Source: Intel
Processor Name | Architecture | Cache | Clock Speed | Front Side Bus |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium M processor Low Voltage 738 | 90 nm | 2 MB L2 | 1.40 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium M processor Low Voltage 718 | 130 nm | 1 MB L2 | 1.30 GHz | 400 MHz |
Source: IntelThe low voltage versions are designed for ultra-light notebooks at < 5 lbs.
Is The Celeron M An Alternative?
The Celeron M and the Pentium M share the same architecture. However, the Celeron M supports neither Intel's SpeedStep nor the Deeper Sleep State. Thus, it actually consumes considerably more energy when idle. As a result, while the processor and the notebook may be cheaper than a model equipped with a Pentium M, the battery time will definitely be shorter.
The table below summarizes Celeron M models.
Processor Name | Architecture | Cache | Clock Speed | Front Side Bus |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron M processor 360 | 90 nm | 1 MB L2 | 1.40 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Celeron M processor 350 | 90 nm | 1 MB L2 | 1.30 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Celeron M processor 340 | 130 nm | 512 kB L2 | 1.50 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Celeron M processor 330 | 130 nm | 512 kB L2 | 1.40 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Celeron M processor 320 | 130 nm | 512 kB L2 | 1.30 GHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Celeron M processor 310 | 130 nm | 512 kB L2 | 1.30 GHz | 400 MHz |