MSI R9 290X Lightning Review: The Right Way To Cool Hawaii
Judging from the R9 290X Lightning's hefty build, it takes a lot of metal to cool the Hawaii GPU properly. But what does this massive card give you aside from sharp looks? How about impressive acoustics? Is its $750 price tag worth the premium experience?
Meet The Largest, Heaviest Radeon R9 290X Of All
Based on the size of its R9 290X Lightning, it appears that MSI has a thing for overkill. But the company might also be onto something. As we already know, cooling AMD's Hawaii GPU properly is what separates the men from the boys. Forget about re-purposing cooling solutions from other cards. Asus tried that and it didn't go over well at all. Instead, MSI sent over a three-slot take on the Radeon R9 290X, which, as you can see, employs a trio of cooling fans and a lot of metal dedicated to keeping that hot graphics processor operating within its comfort zone.
This thing isn't a toy. A $700 price tag, tied for the most-expensive Radeon on Newegg, makes you think hard before dropping nearly $150 more than the cheapest models with aftermarket cooling.
Even the Lightning's box is massive; it includes an extra compartment with lots of accessories and a certificate of ownership. You're dealing with a limited-edition piece of hardware, after all.
The snazzy-looking board and high-end packaging (not to mention lofty price) naturally have us expecting quite a bit out of MSI's R9 290X Lightning. Historically, the company reserves this branding for its flagship models. Does this board live up to that standard? It's time to break out the lab gear and find out.
Box Style and Contents
The number of accessories you get with this card is impressive, though we question the wisdom of including 6-to-8-pin adapter cables. Why solder eight-pin plugs to the card and then encourage users to fry thinner cables that might not be suitable for driving a high-end GPU? The same goes for the bundled Molex adapter. Who in their right mind would make up the balance of too-few cables by tapping into a pair of four-pin plugs? We've woken up to the smell of smoke in the morning; it's not fun. Seriously. We expect folks who buy $700 graphics cards to use similarly enthusiast-oriented PSUs.
Beyond the manual and CD (which contains the drivers, MSI's Afterburner software, and a fan control utility for the three fans), the box contains a metal plate, thermal pads, and screws. The plate fits over the DC-DC converters when you embark on an extreme overclocking mission, go the water cooling route, and remove the massive heat sink.
Lab Note about the Dimensions
The dimensions reported here don't necessarily match the manufacturer's official technical specifications. Rather, we measure them by hand to assure they're correct. The image and chart below should help illustrate what each measurement actually means. Auxiliary PCI Express power connectors are not included; they have to be added depending on the power plug and cable design.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Size Comparison
MSI's R9 290X Lightning is as long as the Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X. However, it monopolizes three expansion slots, and is a tad higher, too. As a result, we're fairly certain it's the bulkiest Radeon R9 290X we've tested thus far.
Models | Length L | Height H | Depth D1 | Depth D2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Asus R9290X-DC2OC-4GD5 R9 290X DirectCU II OC | 11.3" / 288 mm | 5.6" / 142 mm | 1.5" / 38 mm | 0.16" / 4 mm |
Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X | 12.0" / 305 mm | 4.5" / 114 mm | 1.5" / 38 mm | 0.16" / 4 mm |
Gigabyte GV-R929XOC-4GD R9 290X Windforce OC | 11.1" / 282 mm | 4.8" / 123 mm | 1.5" / 38 mm | 0.16" / 4 mm |
HIS R9 290X IceQ X² Turbo | 11.7" / 297 mm | 5.3" / 135 mm | 1.4" / 36 mm | 0.16" / 4 mm |
MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G | 11.0" / 279 mm | 4.7" / 120 mm | 1.5" / 38 mm | 0.24" / 6 mm |
MSI R9 290X Lightning | 12.0" / 305 mm | 4.8" / 122 mm | 2.1" / 53 mm | 0.2" / 5 mm |
Weight Comparison
The weight of a card might be interesting if you're trying to figure out if any additional support is needed, or to calculate the amount of stress your motherboard might be under in a CrossFire-based setup. Since MSI's offering is by far the heaviest in this field, we want to emphasize the importance of bracing it somehow, even if you're only able to use cable ties.
Models | |
---|---|
Asus R9290X-DC2OC-4GD5 R9 290X DirectCU II OC | 2.5 lbs / 1135 g |
Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X | 2.25 lbs / 1022 g |
Gigabyte GV-R929XOC-4GD R9 290X Windforce OC | 2.32 lbs / 1053 g |
HIS R9 290X IceQ X² Turbo | 2.15 lbs / 976 g |
MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G | 2.29 lbs / 1038 g |
MSI R9 290X Lightning | 3.49 lbs / 1581 g |
Current page: Meet The Largest, Heaviest Radeon R9 290X Of All
Next Page Features And Pictures-
blackmagnum If it costs 750 bucks, it should come with water-cooling. Why the need to slap on a pound of metal to cool it if there was a more customer friendly way?Reply -
solix Unless I am mistaken you burn 3 slots with this guy. For how close this is to the Tri-x in thermals and acoustics, but with the loss of a slot and the added price, meh. Tri-x still seems like the best value proposition.Reply -
CaptainTom I just want to point out how silly the 780 Ti is priced. People, this card trades blows with the 780 Ti while giving you an extra GB of VRAM. It should cost at least as much as the 780 Ti. Or better yet, the other way around! ;)Reply -
AndrewJacksonZA Unfortunately, in order to increase this card's GPU voltage, you have to register with MSI for a special license. This isn't given out freely; only professional overclockers can get their hands on it.
Whoa, wait, what??? -
dscudella As of my post, the pricing on Newegg for the mentioned cards:Reply
MSI 290x Lightning $699.99 + $4.99 shipping
Sapphire 290x Tri-X OC $649.99Sapphire 290x Tri-X $639.99Gigabyte 290x Windforce $579.99 ($549.99 after rebate)
This makes the Lightning $125 ($155 after rebate) more expensive than the Windforce. MSI is really stretching the price here. -
zzzaac $899 or 841 USD where i'm from for this card. Got to admit though, 3 slot cards are really unappealing for me.Reply
Got to agree that the Tri-X seems a better value proposition
-
cats_Paw A bit useless review:Reply
The main aspect of a GPU and its most important job is to make games run smooth.
In this review there is only a Performance ratio chart. This does not give the important data at all.
I dont care if that GPU has 80 or 85 FPS in farcry3, but I Do care if it has 25 or 30 on more demanding games/settings.
Finally, this card seems like itsmissing its purpouse a bit.
It has a huge heatsink, but dosent actually run cool or quiet.
It has an OC that is decent but dosent increase performance that much.
You could water cool that GPU for a similar price and get better performance in every aspect as long as you are willing to have a loop in your PC.
-
redgarl Where is your review of the Powercolor PCS+ R290x...? From all the review I have seen, not only they are cheaper, but perform better I from what I am seeing, smaller.Reply -
ubercake That "Certificate of Quality and Stability" is humorous...Reply
"I hereby declare this video card to be of the utmost quality and thereby further and henceforth declare this same electronic device to be 101% stable to the fullest of my capabilities to determine it as such. Sincerely, Your Mom".
Definitely something to frame and hang on your wall above the monitor. -
ewok93 I feel like it would be much more cost effective to go with water cooling, it would definitely be much lighter. I may be wrong, though, as that heatsink is pretty freaking massive. It just seems like past a certain point, air cooling can only do so much, and can only take up so much space.Reply
If you're just going for overkill, I want to see one of these with phase change cooling. It can't cost that much more, can it?