External Graphics Over PCIe 3.0? Netstor's NA255A, Reviewed
Netstor sent over its TurboBox NA255A, an external enclosure capable of accommodating four dual-slot graphics cards across one 16-lane PCI Express 3.0 connection. Is this thing fast enough for general-purpose GPU compute workloads? How about gaming?
Results: General-Purpose GPU
Netstor's TurboBox NA255A is intended for multi-GPU workstations able to leverage the compute power of graphics hardware. So, we start our evaluation using LuxMark.
As you can see, there is no difference in performance between a motherboard operating a PCI Express 2.0 signaling, a motherboard at PCI Express 3.0, and the TurboBox. This workload fully utilizes each graphics card's compute resources, but it doesn't tax PCI Express bandwidth. Consequently, scaling is pretty much amazing.
Again, we see nearly identical results between the motherboard-based cards and Netstor's TurboBox. This means that we don't have any trouble going outside of the box or stepping down to PCI Express 2.0, at least in compute-bound workloads.
On a related note, we ran the same bitcoin mining test on a Socket FM1 motherboard using a PCI Express slot limited to four lanes of connectivity. The result was identical to our 16-lane tests, around 550 Mhash/second. In other words, we're not worried about one third-gen PCIe x16 slot serving up enough throughput for a fourth card in Netstor's NA255A TurboBox. We hypothesize that there's still headroom available.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Results: General-Purpose GPU
Prev Page Test System And Benchmarks Next Page Results: Medal Of Honor WarfighterDon Woligroski was a former senior hardware editor for Tom's Hardware. He has covered a wide range of PC hardware topics, including CPUs, GPUs, system building, and emerging technologies.