Ubuntu 9.10: The Karmic Koala Benchmarked And Reviewed

What's New In 9.10?

Ubuntu 9.10, the “Karmic Koala,” has ushered in more changes to the OS than any other version in recent memory. Some of these changes have been promised (but undelivered) for several releases, while others were relatively recent decisions. On this page, I will go over some of the major additions and replacements for old defaults. The Ubuntu One cloud service and the new Ubuntu Software Center aren't covered here, but have their own pages later on.

Empathy Replaces Pidgin and Ekiga

Probably the most controversial change in Ubuntu 9.10 is the replacement of highly popular, cross-platform, multi-protocol instant messaging client Pidgin with the much less popular and compatible Empathy client. A firestorm of debate has been raging over this topic among developers and users alike ever since the announcement to replace Pidgin was made last year. While Empathy brings tight integration to the desktop, this also means that it is anchored to GNOME. Anyone using KDE, Mac, or Windows will need a different IM client on those installations. Though it should be noted that Empathy also handles VoIP, and therefore replaces Ekiga as well as Pidgin. The opinion polls are about dead even regarding the incorporation of Empathy into Ubuntu and that is where I'll leave it. After all, there are legitimate pros and cons to both sides of the argument.

ext4 Replaces ext3

Another major change to this release is the switch from ext3 to ext4 as the default filesystem. The previous release, 9.04, added ext4 as an option during installation, but left ext3 as the default.

There have been reports of system crashes when moving very large amounts of data due to ext4. I have been using ext4 on my primary machine since the release of 9.04 and can verify those reports. I have experienced several instances where I needed to reboot my PC due to a total lockup caused by moving many gigabytes of data from one folder to another. I have also experienced many lockups in 9.10, but none seem to have anything to do with ext4, since none have occurred when moving files. If you plan on upgrading to Ubuntu 9.10 from an earlier version that uses ext3, you will have to keep it, as only fresh installations will be able to use ext4.

Palimpsest Replaces GParted

A more surprising replacement is that of the default partition editor, GParted, by the newer Palimpsest application. It should be noted that most users won't actually see the name “Palimpsest” until the app is started, since it is simply listed as Disk Utility in the System/Administration menu. 

One upshot to Palimpsest is the nice graphical listing of devices in the left-hand pane. Partitions within a device are listed in file-tree style under the main device. This is a definite improvement for new users over GParted's drop-down menu of /dev listings of devices, which has made many a newbie accidentally erase their hard drive. I've long said that GParted is much too complicated for simple jobs like erasing a USB flash drive.

Palimpsest actually has the options to please advanced users as well. I found Palimpsest to have even more filesystem options than GParted, though the option to resize partitions is sorely missed. Even without the ability to resize partitions, Palimpsest is a good call, since GParted wasn't actually included in Ubuntu, but available as a download in the repos.


Upstart is a new addition that handles the applets and services that load when you start your machine, suspend, or resume. Upstart does not control anything during the first part of the boot process, but speeds up the last part of boot-up--that awkward moment when the desktop is visible, but still unusable (this means things like the network manager, battery indicator, volume control, and the new Ubuntu One syncing service). I've found that Upstart does its job perfectly. There is no more “unusable” desktop with the Karmic Koala. It goes straight from login to splash screen to a fully usable desktop.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • burnley14
    The new Upstart feature sounds terrific. Windows needs to take notes, I hate the awkward limbo of seeing your desktop but not being able to do anything.
  • Other Comments
  • burnley14
    The new Upstart feature sounds terrific. Windows needs to take notes, I hate the awkward limbo of seeing your desktop but not being able to do anything.
  • Anonymous

    I was a bit surprised to read your slaughter of Ubuntu 9.10, because that does not reflect my experience with it. My first thoughts when reading this were related to the (possible lack of) integrity and technical skills of the author (sorry about that). Then I remembered that I experience a few minor issues when upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 as well and that I read about people which were unhappy with it. However, none of these would IMHO deserve the label "epic fail".

    Spending four days for installing 9.10 and reinstalling 9.04 seems like way more time than you should need. I upgraded my computers running Ubunutu in less than an hour. I have not tried a clean install but it would surprise me that this would be any harder. My parents have also been using Ubuntu for more than a year now without any complaints (this includes an upgrade to 9.10). Maybe I have been lucky?

    I have been using Ubuntu at work and at home for the last 3-4 years and I am pretty happy with it. I am also happy with the fact that you (Tomshardware) have been writing about Linux a bit more frequently. Keep it up, but don't be so harsh :)
  • jj463rd
    I tried it on one PC.Had constant problems with the Mouse not working,system locking up etc.I went back to installing rock solid older 8.04 LTS on it which worked without problems (except for the time consuming (about) 450 updates).
  • rsmith13
    I also got the Kernel problem error messages after installing Xubuntu 9.10 on an AMD 64 system. They went away after doing an update. I now have Xubuntu 9.10 on 5 single and dual core AMD 64 systems. with no problems.

    Do the update!
  • cyberkuberiah
    hardware driver support from the hardware makers themselves is lacking , i installed ubuntu , could not connect to belkin wifi even after using the prop drivers , and then uninstalled it . patience over .
  • haplo602
    nice article ... I mostly skimmed through it :-) anyway can you include a windows 7/vista benchmark base for the same hardware ?

    I know some of the test will be irrelevant (like the timed installation) but most should work.
  • DGriffin
    I had 9.04 and upgraded to 9.10 with out any problems at all... I have a AMD 64 processor and had no problems with the 64bit vir... ..idk maybe I got lucky, but I sorta doubt it..
  • MaxTesla
    The screensaver starts after 5 min so when you install Ubuntu the screen saver will start and the screen will go black you need to move your mouse too see the instalation again, this could of course be mistaken for a crash
  • MaxTesla
    The screen saver starts after 5 min so when you install Ubuntu the screen saver will start and the screen will go black you need to move your mouse too see the installation again, this could of course be mistaken for a crash
  • Anonymous
    I tried installing Ubuntu 9.10 via Wubi, immediately after rebooting from Windows and seeing the Ubuntu bootscreen it gave me a black screen, with my monitor reporting that there was no signal. Back to Windows I go, I suppose. :/
  • techguy378
    Windows is the most advanced desktop OS ever created. Unless you have a really, really old computer that can't run anything past Windows 98 there is never a reason not to run Windows on a PC. Don't waste your time with this Linux crap. Free isn't always better.
  • Anonymous
    Oh! Please!

    All these installation crashes sound like memory failures. Did you run memtest before installing?
  • ibnsina
    Simplicity + smooth Graphics UI = Great Linux

    Great Linux + industry support (drivers+gaming) = Great Operating System
  • Anonymous
    Techguy378- Depends what you want it for. I use both OSes extensively. I quite enjoy not having to run an antivirus on my Ubuntu machine for instance. The responsiveness of Ubuntu is much better on the same machine when compared to windows, It's just unfortunate that some hardware isn't fully supported. That situation has improved a lot over the last few years but it's still there- my laptop would run ubuntu but the ACPI code in the bios is buggy (this is a hardware issue NOT a software issue- Microsoft just hasn't implemented the layer correctly which, oddly, circumvented the issue. Lucky! That said, i'd like to question what a proper implementation is if the one done incorrectly is the one that works....)

    I use Vista for my audio stuff, mainly because Fruityloops lags in Ubuntu. I also use Vista on my laptop for the ACPI issue, but I use ubuntu on my Desktop and server, because it's just less of a monster and requires less aftermarket tools to keep running. (Antivirus.)
  • Anonymous
    I just spent the entire night trying to get Ubuntu 9.10 to get my USB devices to work in high speed mode. And I still haven't got it to work yet. Looks like there are a LOT of issues with Ubuntu. I only need to copy some stuff out of my ext4 partitions and using Ubuntu seems to be the wrong choice.
  • rean24
    I had no problem with 9.10 .
    Installed it through "Wubi" Not sure should i make the major change with a clean install.

    But soo far I havnt had any complains , all the effects are working , oline , workwise its Top-Notch.

    And Yes i am a Unbutu N00d..But Windows PRO...And if after a month of no problem will make the major change in OS.

    Only Complain I had was with my Logitic wireless mouse , but a quick change to the Microsoft one solved it all...
  • dimitrik
    Good review. The fact is that about half the reviews of 9.10 are either negative or neutral due to problems encountered. Compared to the near universal positive reception of 9.04 this does warrant the words Epic Fail, especially since it squanders much of the goodwill built up by the success of 9.04.

    Based on all the reviews, I'm not even going to bother trying to run 9.10.
    I will give Linux Mint 8 a try instead which is based on 9.10 but has been customized for even more user-friendly operation and stability.
    The previous release Mint 7 was a nice improvement on 9.04 (which was great too) so I hope the Mint guys can pull the rabbit out of the hat again.

    Either way, I'll dual boot the new OS with my old one before even thinking of making it my main desktop.
  • tvel
    I had no problems installing my 9.10 64 bit and I was surprised to read all the trouble you had.
    I'm using it for a month now with no problems at all.
  • JimmiG
    Well, I've tried Ubuntu 9.04 previously, and it installed without a hitch on both my desktop and laptop systems.

    9.10 however just gives me a black screen when trying to use the bootable CD on my laptop. On my desktop system it installs fine, but doesn't detect my wireless adapter. 9.04 detected it automatically.

    I could probably fix both issues with patience, but it proves that Linux still isn't ready for desktop/laptop use, even though Linuxtremists have been claiming that for a decade.
  • nevertell
    I've been using it since it went beta, and I haven't experienced any issues with the out-of-the box stuff. I do hate, the new media manager, I just want a tool to switch from alsa to PA when I want either gaming with wine or regular day-to-day use.