The State Of The Personal Computer

A Growing Mac Community

With each iteration of Mac OS X, more and more Windows users are making the switch to a Mac. You rarely hear people making the switch in the other direction. Most consumers will be happy with the basic iLife, iWork, and Safari setup. Gaming enthusiasts will find that the Mac still lags behind the PC for the latest 3D titles, but many top-tier games such as Call of Duty 4 and StarCraft II are or will be available for the OS X.

In a way, you have to look at the Mac as a closed platform along the lines of the Wii, PlayStation 3, or Xbox 360. While it’s built using the standard hardware found in traditional PCs, Mac OS X represents a unique computing environment. By paying the Apple tax and giving up some freedom to play in Apple’s sandbox, Mac users enjoy a relative improvement in computing security and a user-experience that is unparalleled. If grandma’s PC is broken, would you trust Geek Squad to fix it for her? Depends on who happens to be working at the Geek Squad. If grandma’s Mac Mini is broken, would you trust the Genius Bar to fix it for her? Absolutely. It’s nothing special—Apple tech support simply has fewer variables to deal with.

Budget-conscious consumers will always find their best deal in a PC. Consumers with task-specific goals such as first-person shooter gaming, Adobe Photoshop CS4, or Home Theater PC will still find the PC a superior platform. However, for most home computing (office suite, digital photography, and Internet) and the task-specific goal of digital video, the Mac is the ideal platform for those who can afford it.

How Apple Can Screw Things Up

Apple has done a great job of developing a viable commercially supported desktop operating system. There are thousands of applications that the PC has that the Mac won’t have, but at the end of the day, Apple has a solid platform that meets the needs of most computer users. Better yet, Apple has been able to do this at a premium. It has been able to market its platform as something better than what’s out there as opposed to the “same thing for less money.” In today’s financial crisis, this may actually help Apple remain stable. With healthy profit margins and a track record of efficient budgeting (just look at the cash Apple holds in reserve), it’s possible for Apple to maintain strong sales in 2009.

In a recession, less money is spent on luxury items. With that said, computers are a necessity. Those who just bought a new PC recently won’t switch to a Mac. However, imagine a PC user whose machine was just infected by malware. This PC may be a few years old and “due for a replacement.” The options are to fix the PC by taking it to the local repair shop or getting a new one in order to eliminate the risk that any residual malware is on the PC keeping track of online banking passwords, etc. This is the type of user Apple wants to capture into the Mac world.

Therefore, security remains the critical feature that Apple must maintain. Security is one of the key selling points of Macs today. Exploits for Apple PCs have occurred in local environments, but to date, there hasn’t been a widespread malware attack on OS X users. The general public is savvy to malware, and as long as Apple can maintain the security of OS X against in-the-wild remote exploits, it’ll continue to enjoy strong sales even in an economic recession.

  • Linux share is down to 0.7% in october
    Anonymous prediction for 2009 - 0.3%
    Reply
  • lamorpa
    Thanks for typing some numbers in your message that either you or someone else pulled out of the air. I'm going to make up some numbers like 2% and 2.4% in 2009. How's that?
    Reply
  • nukemaster
    110% in 2009 and about 150% in 2010
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    "For the average consumer, the transition to 64-bit means a more stable operating system." Kinda amusing! Ye I know vista 64 is a lot more stable than vista 32, but at least at my place, that's still not very stable. My ati graphics driver frequently crashes and has to be recovered by vista - good thing the recovery works, so I just have to sit back and wait - don't even have to reboot or restart wow or the movie that was running etc. May want to rewind a bit though :) But still - it DOES crash, and it takes more time booting than 32 bit on my system (probably the raid drivers fault), and neither my e-tech nor my logitech webcam works with 64bit (the e-tech does with 32 bit).

    So more stable? perhaps, but certainly not in my home.
    Reply
  • radnor
    You are correct about linux. But i should add one thing. WINE.

    It is getting better every version that launches, but still needs a lot of love. Wine use should be simple and stealthy. That is, put a x86 windows cd, and wine detects and pulls out a auto run. You get the idea.

    when that happens Linux will check mate Win/OSX. Compiz/Fusion is already prettier than OSX (and with great promises) and the system is much safer. And faster.

    Lets wait and see.
    Reply
  • I think the future will be about virtutalization of machines and applications. If we had a low level virtual OS that supported a standard UI then any machine or application could be installed on it. That is you could have a single look and feel while running Windows, Mac, Linux, or other OS's or applications.
    Reply
  • A very good article, but I found it odd that you believe OS X to be the most secure operating system. In the pwn2own contest recently, OS X was compromised in only 2 minutes. Vista fell a day later to a flaw in 3rd party software. Linux didn't fall.
    Reply
  • I still laugh every time I see the "I'm a mac" commercials on TV.

    Mac is comparing itself to windows OS or rather they should be. The Apple community is content believing that PC(Personal Computer) means Windows. They simply don't know the difference. Note to mac users: Macs are PCs also. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_computer

    Also, listen to the music in the background. It's lullaby nature appeals to the mentality of Mac users as does the original color pallet 'box of crayons' in the system settings. They didn't design it that way by accident.

    That's why Mac users love to boast about the commercials and their computers. Basic - ignorance is bliss.

    It's not your fault though. It's not like personal computers have been widely available since the late 1970's but you haven't bothered to take one class on them right? You haven't?! That's a pity and thank you.

    It's people like you who keep the entire PC(yes you too) technical community employed.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    radnorYou are correct about linux. But i should add one thing. WINE.It is getting better every version that launches, but still needs a lot of love. Wine use should be simple and stealthy. That is, put a x86 windows cd, and wine detects and pulls out a auto run. You get the idea.when that happens Linux will check mate Win/OSX. Compiz/Fusion is already prettier than OSX (and with great promises) and the system is much safer. And faster.Lets wait and see.
    Dunno about all below the wine, as I don't use linux for anything other than firewalls. But I don't think wine will ever get to a level that allows linux to replace windows. Mac OS has a chance - but only if they somehow can make game developers compile mainstream games for the mac.

    Though the article in general is very well written, I still find it fails on one simple aspect. Gaming. Every single pc I've built in the past 5 years was expected to play pretty much any non-top-tier game. Ie. not crysis, but if hugo or pixeline, or any other childrens game, was shipped with some magazine or put on discount, the people I built the computers for, expect that the software will work. That can't be realized on a mac unless it runs windows - at which point there's no reason to buy the more expensive mac.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    KamujinA very good article, but I found it odd that you believe OS X to be the most secure operating system. In the pwn2own contest recently, OS X was compromised in only 2 minutes. Vista fell a day later to a flaw in 3rd party software. Linux didn't fall.
    If we imagine a future version of flash, silverlight, java or any other internet based system could address the hardware in a pc via a standard interface - like directx or opengl etc but on the actaul hardware, instead of on the gui. And without the programmer needing expert knowledge of the limitations of the features, then virtualization won't even be needed. Stuff would just run directly on hardware. A bit like a seamless window on a citrix system, but with the hardware being used locally, and the drivers being a bunch of software embedded in the hardware burried beneath the gui.

    But that probably won't happen for another 10 years, so windows is safe, even with a complete idiot at the wheel.
    Reply