Palit, Gainward Packs GTX 580 Cards with 3 GB
Two new GeForce GTX 580 cards sport an impressive 3 GB of GDDR5 memory.
Tech Connect reports that both Gainward and parent company Palit Microsystems have announced GeForce GTX 580 graphics cards with 3 GB of GDDR5 memory each.
According to the report, the Gainward offering sports the Phantom brand and a custom cooler with three 80-mm PWM fans, six heatpipes, a copper base and 44 aluminum fans. The Palit card also comes with a custom cooler, however it only utilizes two fans.
Out of the two, Gainward's GTX 580 Phantom looks more like a miniature radiator (seen right). However beyond that, the card itself features the typical GTX 580 setup including 512 CUDA cores, a core clock of 783 MHz, a shader clock of 1566 MHz, a memory clock of 4020 MHz, a 364-bit memory interface and DirectX 11 support. There's also dual DVI ports, HDMI and DisplayPort connections. The card follows Gainward's previous GeForce GTX 570 Phantom card with 1280 MB of memory, and the GeForce GTX 580 GOOD with 1536 MB of memory.
As for the new Palit GeForce GTX 580 graphics card, it appears to simply double the memory found on Palit's previous 1536 MB version. Like the Gainward version, the card offers the same GTX 580 basics including 512 CUDA cores, a core clock of 783 MHz, a shader clock of 1566 MHz, a memory clock of 4020 MHz and so on.
"Top notch performances with nice design, the dual-fan cooler design of Palit GTX 580 emits the heat more effectively but remains the noise level under control at the same time," the company said in regards to the previous 1 GB model. "Palit GTX 580 provides exceedingly quiet environment in idle but also generates less temperature when it's under heavy loading during gameplay."
Currently it's unknown when the new Palit and Gainward cards will be available. Pricing was also not provided, so stay tuned-- we should see something official any day now.
- Eurocom Claims 'Most Powerful 15" Notebook'
- Blizzard Officially Responds to World of StarCraft
- A Comical Look at the State of the Internet
- Phone Disguised as Keyboard Can Hack Computer
- AMD Shipped Over 1 Million Fusion APUs
- AMD: OpenGL 4.1 Arrives On Windows, Linux
- Love PCs? Love Helping? Donate Just One Dollar
- Next-Gen Intel Chipsets To Support USB 3.0
- What It's Like Watching a Computer Illiterate
- MSI Intros First Mainboard with AMD's APU
- 2011: Is Microsoft Drifting Into Insignificance?
- Google Chrome Laptop Now Comes With Stickers
- Microsoft Points Out iPad's Enterprise Weaknesses
- Do-Not-Track Next Major Browser Feature
- Intel to Share Next-Gen Poulson CPU Details
- DRAM Prices at 22-Month Low, Start Buying
- Blizzard Unveils 3 Custom Games for StarCraft 2
- id Software Releases New RAGE Screens







Insane. $800+????
memory OVERKILL 9000
How will going from 1.5GB to 3GB effect game play?
How will going from 1.5GB to 3GB effect game play?
You will have less money to spend on games.
How will going from 1.5GB to 3GB effect game play?
Will only show any gains if you are doing multi-monitor high resolution heavy AA etc. That's what these cards were built for (note the Display port on the cards).
the point of 3GB being?
the point of 3GB being?
Due to the architecture of the card, they couldn't go to 2GB, like the HD 6950/70. 2GB would be enough for now, but as it is, they had to double the memory to 3GB. Hey, you might be able to take advatage of that in heavy multimonitor gameplay, or in regular play in 2 years (when high end gpu's will probably come with 3GB; it will be a mainstream card by then, but still pretty usable)
Will only show any gains if you are doing multi-monitor high resolution heavy AA etc. That's what these cards were built for (note the Display port on the cards).
Did you see the new charts comparing the GTX 560Ti? There was no visible correlation between 1GB vs. 2GB memory amounts even in highest resolutions with AA turned on. This product is for bragging rights only. Just like intel's 1000 dollar Extreme chips. No noticeable performance gains, but many people still buy them.
Did you see the new charts comparing the GTX 560Ti? There was no visible correlation between 1GB vs. 2GB memory amounts even in highest resolutions with AA turned on. This product is for bragging rights only. Just like intel's 1000 dollar Extreme chips. No noticeable performance gains, but many people still buy them.
Muuuuuuuuuuuullltiiiiiiiiiiiiiippplllllllllee
Moooooooooooooooooonniiiiiiiiiiiiiitoooooooooooooooooooooors
Did you see the new charts comparing the GTX 560Ti? There was no visible correlation between 1GB vs. 2GB memory amounts even in highest resolutions with AA turned on. This product is for bragging rights only. Just like intel's 1000 dollar Extreme chips. No noticeable performance gains, but many people still buy them.
As for the extreme chips.....they have unlocked multipliers necessary for the highest overclocks and also are binned to get further on less voltage. They have a higher coded and unlockable TDP allowing for even further overclocking
You are a retard if you run an extreme chip at stock speeds
You will have less money to spend on games.
funny and very true
Insane. $800+????
That will be the price of the 6990
Did you see the new charts comparing the GTX 560Ti? There was no visible correlation between 1GB vs. 2GB memory amounts even in highest resolutions with AA turned on. This product is for bragging rights only. Just like intel's 1000 dollar Extreme chips. No noticeable performance gains, but many people still buy them.
Well, I happen to own a 980X, and it just so happens that there is a significant performance gain over pretty much everything on the market. You should look at the CPU Higherarchy Chart. Oh, and in terms of performance gains from my last system? I was using a P4 3.0GHz single core processor with HT. So you could say that it performs a lil better...
Is that aluminum fins? 44 fans means a lot of power for the cooler itself!
Is that aluminum fins? 44 fans means a lot of power for the cooler itself!
It has to be fins, just...just has to. Doesn't it?
Will only show any gains if you are doing multi-monitor high resolution heavy AA etc. That's what these cards were built for (note the Display port on the cards).
High res here at 2560 x 1600 30 inches but im waiting on the AMD 6990 Antilles card with 4gb thanks but no thanks Nvidia.
You'll still end up with 2GB per GPU...
Great for rendering...
Did you see the new charts comparing the GTX 560Ti? There was no visible correlation between 1GB vs. 2GB memory amounts even in highest resolutions with AA turned on. This product is for bragging rights only. Just like intel's 1000 dollar Extreme chips. No noticeable performance gains, but many people still buy them.
Actually, Hardocp recently did SLI, CF reviews at 5760x1200. There were some signs that SLI 580 did hit the memory wall.
Yeah, but will the new cards follow the original GTX580 reference design for mounting a water block? That's the info manufacturers should be providing. :-\
MuuuuuuuuuuuullltiiiiiiiiiiiiiipppllllllllleeMoooooooooooooooooonniiiiiiiiiiiiiitoooooooooooooooooooooors
Who the hell wants to use multiple monitors!? just get a freaking HDTV!
Wow tiny freaking monitors placed besides each other OR 1 big screen on your wall...what would be better? I'd go with 1 big screen! and if they want some realistic 3dish effect, then get a 3DTV. Why the hell would someone waste $800 on this thing and then another $400-$500 on 3 monitors?
I wonder if this could be used instead of a $2k quadro 5000 for tasks that require lots of memory?
I wonder if this could be used instead of a $2k quadro 5000 for tasks that require lots of memory?
That's exactly what I was thinking. This would be incredible on Adobe Premiere with the Mercury Playback Engine. I am using the GTX460 for it now which in itself is incredible compared to CPU only but moving up to that would likely improve performance to the point that I would hit an I/O wall and need an SSD to unlock the full performance of the rest of the system.
OTOH, it might be that using a gamer card with lots of RAM doesn't end up being
that much better (if at all) than a Quadro because of the basic 3D operation
optimisations being so different, eg. look at my Viewperf results for EVGA GTX
460 1GB FTW vs. Quadro FX 5500:
http://www.sgidepot.co.uk/misc/viewperf.txt
I've not yet run Viewperf 11 on the 460, will do so as soon as I can.
Ian.
MuuuuuuuuuuuullltiiiiiiiiiiiiiipppllllllllleeMoooooooooooooooooonniiiiiiiiiiiiiitoooooooooooooooooooooors
LOL yea really..... lets see buy 2 23" monitors or just get one big 30" monitor that will not have a thick plastic bezel between the screen
EPIC FAIL
LOL yea really..... lets see buy 2 23" monitors or just get one big 30" monitor that will not have a thick plastic bezel between the screen EPIC FAIL
Resolutions, and that would be 3 23 inch monitors. While I don't really like multi monitor eyefinity/nvidia whatever setups there is a big reason. 3 monitors supports a higher res than say 1 30 inch. A way higher res.
there are too many morons here who don't understand the concept that 3 monitors has a greater resolution one "BIG" monitor.
memory OVERKILL 9000
No.A GTX580 really need more memory. It has huge GPU muscle but performance decreases at high resolutions ( and in surround ) due to insufficient memory.
I think you meant to say "44 aluminum fins." rather than fans. And isn't the GTX580 a 384-bit memory interface, not 364?
#corrections
My current setup is :
I7 980x OC to 4.5ghz
580gtx sli
6 gig ram
3x 24 inch monitor.
I can say that playing on 3 monitors is a different experience. 1.5gig is good until 4x AA after that it becomes a bottleneck.
And to those saying just get a big tv or monitor, its not the same as multimonitor because with multimonitor you are actually seeing more, due to higher resolution you actually get to see more content.