Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Conclusion

by

Palit Microsystems uses the highest base clocks to top all of our performance charts, yet doesn’t appear to charge for all of that extra performance (or the risk of GPU failure accompanying it). How can a company overclock so far without increasing price? Two words that come to mind are “warranty coverage.” Palit recently extended its warranty to two years, which is two-thirds the length of most competitors. As a user who’s had several GPU cooling fans fail only months before the warranty expired, I can understand the expense Palit’s competitors must bear to provide a warranty that lasts throughout the realistic usefulness of the card. Think of this like Nissan's GT-R. Buy the souped up ride with the shorter coverage period if you can take the heartache of a failure down the road.

Meanwhile, at the other end of the warranty scale, EVGA offers something akin to BMW's factory-recommended maintenance program (only better, since EVGA extends lifetime protection). Higher-priced graphics cards like the one tested today carry this guarantee. EVGA also has a legendary support structure that makes it very easy to process any cards that have problems, and the company even gives its buyers 90-days to decide whether they want to keep the card or use its full value towards the purchase of a faster model. Of course, we've now all seen what happens to these great warranties when a company like BFG goes belly-up, so don't base your entire purchasing decision on that, either.

Sparkle and Zotac follow EVGA’s lead by offering lifetime warranties, but neither of these companies has yet earned EVGA’s reputation for responsive support (admittedly a quality that takes time to build up and spread the word about). If we were to choose between the Sparkle or Zotac cards, we’d risk being forced to jump through a few hoops, should warranty service be required. The only card in today’s comparison to offer a DisplayPort connection, Zotac makes an equally strong argument for picking its card by including a free game. Meanwhile, Sparkle adds a modest overclock and a 6’ HDMI cable to its package.

Yet, a lifetime warranty isn’t very valuable once technology improvements make an old card worthless. While cards more than three years old are often in line to be replaced, the few that remain in use add significant support cost to manufacturers who offer longer coverage periods. Asus, ECS, Gigabyte, and MSI try to balance their cost against the needs of most buyers by providing a warranty that’s exactly three years long. Among these manufacturers, Asus has the greatest peak cooling capability and clock speed, Gigabyte has the lowest price, and MSI falls in the middle with a huge cooler and moderate price.

Because every card in today’s comparison is a compromise of features, performance, warranty, and price, individual buyers must carefully consider their specific needs before choosing a favorite.

Share:
91
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
Tamz_msc 08/30/2010 8:03 AM
Hide
-1+

Good article.

TheStealthyOne 08/30/2010 8:06 AM
Hide
-0+

I really am a fan of ASUS' DirectCu/TOP cards.

I can't decide between the 460 and 5850 versions :P

Tamz_msc 08/30/2010 8:18 AM
Hide
-20+

I would have liked noise benchmarks.

beans4you 08/30/2010 8:26 AM
Hide
-3+

just installed two gigabyte 460 cards in my brothers new setup, they are pretty nice! can't hear them even with the 2 fans on each and they run around 25/29 C idle, this is as far as I've gotten with tests :p

falchard 08/30/2010 8:40 AM
Show
Lmeow 08/30/2010 8:40 AM
Hide
-1+

Wow. Jetway's 33 % overclock is nSane... especially on what seems to be nVidia's reference cooler.

I wonder how many cards can reach that 900 MHz with acceptable noise and voltage levels.

El_Capitan 08/30/2010 8:48 AM
Hide
-15+

This review is trying to tell us what? Higher overclocked cards give better performance? Duh?

It would have been better to see each card overclocked to it's most stable overclock first, then test the cards with all the benchmarks.

I read CPU magazine's article comparing the GTX 460's, and same conclusion. Palit is the fastest, but MSI's is the quietest and coolest.

I've been looking into getting a pair for SLI. Those that don't have extra space between their PCI Express 2.0 slots should go for the EVGA Superclocked because of the external exhaust. Those that do have space like me and prefer low noise would be better off the MSI's. Performance-wise, they're all great overclockers (every card in this review can overclock higher than Palit's factory overclock). Honestly, you really can't go wrong with any of these cards.

vixiv 08/30/2010 9:33 AM
Hide
-3+

El_Capitan :
Honestly, you really can't go wrong with any of these cards.



Basically.

void 08/30/2010 9:51 AM
Hide
-0+

I have one gigabyte card and very happy with it. Almost complete silent at idle. and not much noise at 100% fan speed. 50% fan speed is enough to keep it around 60c in games

amgsoft 08/30/2010 9:55 AM
Hide
-2+

If you are going to use the cards in PC in your home, the less noisy and the coolest is often the best choice.

IzzyCraft 08/30/2010 9:58 AM
Hide
-1+

Quote :MSI has become famous for its Afterburner software, but the core voltage adjustment doesn’t work with this particular card


I'm fairly sure that one does support overvoltage but you have to check "unlock voltage control" and "unlock voltage monitoring" then restart the program, only reason i note this is that only a few 460's support any kind of voltage control, not that it needs it for an impressive overclock.

It's in the change log afterall
Quote :Afterburner 1.6.1 (2010-07-07)
Added NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 series and MSI N460GTX Cyclone series graphics cards support (including voltag control!)

http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm
also lol voltage is typoed lol

supposedly msi has a 460 fully custom in the works that will support even memory voltage tweaking
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthrea [...] 9&t=326936

Onyx2291 08/30/2010 10:07 AM
Hide
-0+

Ah, I'll be using this as reference in the future. Sometimes it's hard deciding between companies haha.

Mark Heath 08/30/2010 10:26 AM
Hide
-1+

Nice article.

Quote :Shuffling Through The Cards

Nice (sub)title :p

LordConrad 08/30/2010 10:59 AM
Hide
--2+

I like my "Galaxy GTX 460 Super OC". Factory clocked at 810 MHz GPU, 4000MHz GDDR5. Out of the box it's faster than Palit's Sonic Platinum.

nevertell 08/30/2010 11:29 AM
Hide
-0+

I'd still go for the MSI, since I've read that that cooler is the most silent of them all. And it's temps' are the best of all, so more OC'ing potential. Too bad you didn't include "sound" tests, I'd like to see how loud/silent other coolers get under load.

Emperus 08/30/2010 11:45 AM
Hide
-0+

How safe is it to get the cheapest out of the lot.? Very safe i guess.. How much value is it to get the costliest.? Pretty good i guess.. So the consumer is basically safe with any choice made.. That's always a good thing.. This just may be one of those cases where one can pick a card more based on its aesthetics.. Nice huh..

anthonys17 08/30/2010 11:48 AM
Hide
-2+

MSI/Asus, the hell. .it's still a 460! nice article :)

wishmaster12 08/30/2010 12:24 PM
Show
Crashman 08/30/2010 12:35 PM
Hide
-0+

anthonys17 :
MSI/Asus, the hell. .it's still a 460! nice article

Yes, MSI and Asus are about equal. MSI starts out cooler but has less maximum-speed cooling, Asus starts out warmer but the fan has more room to speed up. They're about the same noise level until you speed things up, in which case MSI tops out before Asus.

MechaNintendoMaster 08/30/2010 1:34 PM
Hide
-0+

I like the MSi one.....


Ads

Best offers

All about Graphics Cards
 Graphics Cards performance charts
All Graphics Cards charts

Newsletters


OK
Ads