BOE Demos 600 Hz Gaming Laptop Display

BOE
(Image credit: ITHome)
21

BOE this week demonstrated the industry's fastest display panel with a 600 Hz refresh rate, which by far exceeds that of the best gaming monitors. The panel is designed for laptops aimed at hardcore gamers who demand absolutely the highest performance, including an absurdly high refresh rate. Meanwhile, the demonstration raises more questions than answers as it is unclear how BOE managed to make such a panel work and its benefits to the end user are uncertain too.

BOE showcased the industry's first 16-inch LCD panel with a 600 Hz refresh rate with an oxide backplane technology at the World Conference on Display Industry in Chengdu, China, this week, reports IT Home citing the company's press release. The demonstration of the display panel was carried out using a laptop carrying AMD Ryzen and Nvidia GeForce RTX logotypes (more on this later). First, however, the panel was attached to the chassis using tape. A 600 Hz refresh rate is something that the range-topping best graphics cards might need to show their true potential in games like CrossFire, CS: GO, or PUBG. But it's not that easy, so let's analyze what this 600 Hz LCD panel is all about.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Neilbob
    My willpower isn't strong enough. I have to say it. I just do.

    Pointless, pointless, POINTLESS!
    Reply
  • ikernelpro4
    Now this is just stupid.

    600hz means nothing except higher prices to produce this nonsence.

    ------
    144hz is enough, especially considering that you have to hit 144 fps in the case of games which is questionable for notebooks and desktops already.

    Even then. 600hz (which you won't notice anyway) for what? Firefox? Explorer? Money well spent....
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    It's going to sell like hotcakes to "eSports" people though, even if it does have a garbage TN panel.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    all hail Jensen for finally, after 18 long and arduous years, has provided us with the ability to play CS:GO the way it was intended to be played: at 600 fps/600hz

    /end sarcasm
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    ikernelpro4 said:
    144hz is enough, especially considering that you have to hit 144 fps in the case of games which is questionable for notebooks and desktops already.
    in fps games you want frames when you are competitive.

    this means low resolution and settings as low as possible to make the frame rate high as possible.


    stupid, but its what some ppl do.


    i do agree its pointless to have 600 refresh rate
    Reply
  • watzupken
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    It's going to sell like hotcakes to "eSports" people though, even if it does have a garbage TN panel.
    I am not sure eSports player will be gaming a on laptop to begin with. Chasing after ridiculous refresh rate is just really for marketing, with no practicality. Problems I foresee,
    At 600Hz, it is going to kill battery life,
    At 1080p, no matter what GPU you slap on the laptop, it will be very CPU bound since mobile CPUs have a tight power limit to work with as compared to their desktop counterpart, And yet, the desktop counterparts are severely bottlenecking the RTX 4090/ 4080 at 1080p.
    So can the 600Hz be realized in real world usage, particularly for gaming? Doesn't sound like it.
    Reply
  • boe rhae
    i don't remember demoing this at all!
    Reply
  • derekullo
    While they are at it they should demo an 12" 640x480 1200 hertz monitor
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    Do you know at how many fps life happens in front of our eyes? It doesn't.. time is not a set of frames. It's not like screens will catch up to real life motion, ever. So whats up to it? Better response time? Less motion blur? Did it really matter to anyone playing Mario 64 at 30fps? Can you really beat me on CS if you are playing with a 480hz monitor and I with a 60hz IF I play better than you? I must aknowledge that a120hz does look more pleasing on a smartphone compared to a 60hz one, that means when there are 240hz models I may say "eh... I think I maybe noticed something?.. now 240hz to 480hz? Put 10 people looking at them side by side and tell which is which.... It's pointless beyond that point
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    240hz/fps is end game, no matter how you look at it; same for 4K. Today a monitor like Neo G9 is really end game. Haters will hate but if you put side by side a 1080p/60Hz Plasma next to a 4K/120hz OLED there are still people who are going to think the plasma is the better looking, these numbers means nothing in real life. If you call over your girlfriend to play Mario 64 with you on your N64 vs with a RTX3080... you think she's going to actually notice the fps difference? Sorry guys but this is NERD assumption. It's the same at photo equipment reviews the NERDS crying "my medium format stomps your 4/3".. but when you actually print it.. the girlfriend (the tech clueless) won't tell the difference, there is virtually none. Fps stalkers are the new pixel peepers of old, same waste of mental resource and just marketing e
    Reply