Colorful iGame RTX 3080 Vulkan Review: LCD-Adorned Unavailability
A fancy LCD with good performance on another card you can't buy.
Colorful RTX 3080 iGame Vulcan Overview
The GeForce RTX 3080 remains one of the fastest GPUs available, sitting at the top of our list of the best graphics cards, landing in fourth place in our GPU benchmarks hierarchy. Neither of those is particularly meaningful if you can't actually buy the cards, however. After more than four months since the official launch, the situation doesn't seem to be getting any better. The Colorful RTX 3080 iGame Vulcan was nominally priced at $880 when initially revealed, but it's unclear whether Colorful has officially increased pricing as well in response to tariffs (and let's be real: supply and demand).
Now, we know what you're thinking. "The RTX 3080 is a myth, a fable! It doesn't actually exist!" But we've tested several, so they do in fact exist. Actually, RTX 3080 even shows up on the Steam Hardware Survey, currently sitting at 0.48% of the market, but the statistics behind Valve's survey are cloaked in secrecy so we have no idea what that actually means. Regardless, like all the other RTX 30-series cards, the 3080 Vulcan is nowhere to be found. But if you're looking for a highly customizable card that can hit chart-topping performance, perhaps the wait will be worth it.
You can see the specs for the Colorful RTX 3080 in the table below, along with the reference 3080 Founders Edition, Asus TUF Gaming OC, and MSI Gaming X Trio. There's not much to say other than the GPUs are all the same, and the only real difference is in clock speeds. However, outside of the core specs, there are plenty of other differences, which we'll get to in a moment.
Header Cell - Column 0 | Colorful RTX 3080 iGame Vulcan | RTX 3080 Founders Edition | Asus RTX 3080 TUF Gaming OC | MSI RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio |
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | GA102 | GA102 | GA102 | GA102 |
Process Technology | Samsung 8N | Samsung 8N | Samsung 8N | Samsung 8N |
Transistors (Billion) | 28.3 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 28.3 |
Die size (mm^2) | 628.4 | 628.4 | 628.4 | 628.4 |
SMs / CUs | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 |
GPU Cores | 8704 | 8704 | 8704 | 8704 |
Tensor Cores | 272 | 272 | 272 | 272 |
RT Cores | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 |
Boost Clock (MHz) | 1800 | 1710 | 1815 | 1815 |
VRAM Speed (Gbps) | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
VRAM (GB) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
VRAM Bus Width | 320 | 320 | 320 | 320 |
ROPs | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 |
TMUs | 272 | 272 | 272 | 272 |
GFLOPS FP32 (CUDA) | 31.3 | 29.8 | 31.6 | 31.6 |
TFLOPS FP16 (Tensor) | 125 (251) | 119 (238) | 126 (253) | 126 (253) |
RT TFLOPS | 61.2 | 58.1 | 61.7 | 61.7 |
Bandwidth (GBps) | 760 | 760 | 760 | 760 |
TDP (watts) | 320 | 320 | 320 | 320 |
Dimensions (LxHxW mm) | 285x112x38 | 300x127x51.7 | 323x140x56 | |
Weight (g) | 2089 | 1355 | 1398 | 1564 |
Launch Price | $879 | $699 | $749 | $749 |
By default, the Vulcan card uses Nvidia's reference clocks of 1710MHz boost, but a physical button on the back of the card kicks the boost clock up to 1800MHz. Yes, it's a physical turbo button, hearkening back to the days of yore when I had a 486. But that had an ugly red rectangle, while this is much smaller and more elegantly designed with a blue circle that lights up when it's engaged. In practice, for most gaming workloads, we saw higher clocks than the listed boost clocks since Nvidia's boost rating is more of a conservative estimate than a maximum clock, though certain workloads (e.g., FurMark) can drop clocks below that mark.
Is the physical turbo button a cool addition, or just another gimmick? The card doesn't appear to change performance without a reboot, sadly, which means it's not really that different from other GPUs (e.g., Asus), where there's a switch to toggle between "performance" and "quiet" modes. You might also wonder why Colorful doesn't simply run the card at the OC value all of the time. The answer is power. The card uses slightly less power at stock than the 3080 Founders Edition (minor differences in components easily explain the 4W difference). Press the OC button, and power use jumps by about 45W — and that's before the manual overclock. That's a big jump for a relatively small performance improvement.
The biggest innovation Colorful brings to the table is the flip-up full-color LCD on the top of the card, which you can customize to show things like GPU temperature, clocks, fan speed, and utilization. This isn't the first card to include an LCD, as Colorful had a GTX 1080 Ti with an LCD several years back, along with RTX 2080 Ti and 2080 models, and the Vulcan 3080 is round three for the tech. If you love RGB and bling, the LCD allows you to take things a step further. Or you can just use it as a vanity plate and show your company's logo (not that we'd ever stoop so low).
Besides the LCD, the Vulcan is a pretty typical extreme GPU design. It sports a massive cooler with triple fans and tips the scales at over 2kg (which is only a tiny bit less than the chunky RTX 3090 Founders Edition). The cooler proves capable, keeping temperatures in check and allowing for some moderate overclocking. No real surprises so far. The fans aren't the new style with an integrated rim, which we've seen on most of the other new Ampere models, but while that does improve static pressure, it's probably not a massive difference in overall cooling performance.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Colorful clearly wants the Vulcan card to be something special, and it includes a few interesting extras inside the package to help with the feeling of premium concierge service. This is the first time I've encountered white cloth gloves in a graphics card box (sorry, I didn't use them). More practical, given the beefy nature of the card, is the included support stand. It's adjustable with three rods that accommodate heights of up to one foot, and it screws into the rear of the card to help prevent it from sagging. It's a nice idea, though, in practice, you might find the stand just gets in the way.
The 3080 Vulcan card requires three 8-pin power connectors, and updating the screen information requires a USB connection (cable included) at the back of the card. Then you go into the iGame Center software and you can change what information gets shown on the screen, or you can upload a custom logo. The iGame Center supports a variety of lighting effects, or you can link the card to your motherboard's RGB header. You can also monitor temperatures, fan speeds, and more using the software, but overclocking isn't supported.
For manual overclocking, we used MSI Afterburner with the above settings. We started with the Turbo button enabled, though final performance should be similar regardless — you'd just need a higher GPU OC to reach the same speed. We set the power limit to the maximum of 108%, increased the GPU clock by 150MHz, and boosted the memory speed by 750MHz (20.5Gbps effective). That's similar to what we've done with other 3080 cards, and frankly, the minor differences in performance aren't that important. The silicon lottery — how good your particular chip and board are — will likely be as big of a factor as the particular card model you're using. Plus, a few percent of extra performance while redlining your chip can be a bit of a risk; factory overclocks are more of the safe maximum.
The quality of the cooling is arguably far more important. With the recent update of HWInfo64 to report GDDR6X memory temperatures, we've checked the other 3080 GPUs. It's not good news. For gaming purposes, the cards seem to do okay — we saw maximum memory temps of 102C on the 3080 Founders Edition, slightly lower temps of 100C on the Asus 3080 TUF, and 94C on the MSI 3080 Gaming X Trio. The Colorful 3080 Vulcan basically matched the MSI card, sitting at 94C (in Turbo mode).
Fire up an Ethereum mining app, and the story changes. The 3080 Founders Edition and Asus cards both struggled, with HWInfo64 showing GDDR6X junction temperatures of 110C at stock settings, accompanied by high fan speeds and GPU core throttling. MSI's card did better, briefly peaking at 110C before the fans ramped up and it settled down at 102C. The Colorful Vulcan effectively tied the MSI card, with peak VRAM temps of 102-104C (and no 110C peak). We're not encouraging you to grab a 3080 and start mining, though. While current estimates on profitability sit at around $6-$8 per day (depending on your power costs and the volatility of Ethereum), 24/7 coin mining can definitely reduce the lifespan of your GPU. Mining on a 3080 is a bit like finding a unicorn in the wild and then killing it to see how it tastes — like chicken, or so we've been told. (¬_¬)
Colorful RTX 3080: 4K Gaming Performance
Let's get to the benchmarks. We have four 3080 cards in our charts, along with a few other GPUs as reference points. We tested the RTX 3080 Founders Edition, Asus TUF Gaming OC, and MSI Gaming X Trio cards back when our new test suite was still in flux, so we don't have overclocked results for those cards. Again, it doesn't matter much — all of the cards are within 1-2 percent of each other when overclocked, and thermals and aesthetics are arguably more important. Actually, finding a card for sale is the most important part of choosing a 3080 right now, and that's not going to change any time soon.
While I don't really buy into the idea that people are going to pay extra for a factory overclocked card only to run it at stock clocks, we have three sets of data for the Colorful 3080: The baseline 'stock' performance results are with the OC button off, the 'turbo' results are with the OC button engaged, and finally, we have manually overclocked 'OCed' results using the above settings.
Our test PC continues to be an Intel Core i9-9900K, with the full details on the right. A Core i9-10900K ends up slightly faster, and depending on the games used and other settings, a Ryzen 9 5900X can also come out ahead. However, for these graphics cards benchmarks, I've enabled XMP memory profiles and have the RAM at DDR4-3600 16-18-18 timings, which seems to narrow the field quite a bit. (Our CPU reviews use the highest official memory speed supported by the platform, which gives AMD a bit more of an advantage as the 5900X can go up to DDR4-3200, compared to DDR4-2666 on the 9900K.)
We'll start at 4K, since high-end GPUs are most likely to be used with high resolution displays. Overall, with the turbo button engaged, the Colorful card comes in just slightly behind the MSI Gaming X. Without the turbo option, it ends up looking pretty much like the Founders Edition. Meanwhile, overclocking both the memory and GPU cores boosts performance an average of 6 percent, which is pretty similar to what we've seen on the other 3080 cards.
While the overall composite framerate at 4K ultra is well above 60 fps and indicates very smooth gameplay, the individual games do have a few exceptions to that rule. Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Dirt 5 (with ray tracing), and in particular Watch Dogs Legion (with ray tracing but without DLSS) all drop below 60 fps. There's a bit of swapping around in placement on some of the games, mostly due to margin of error, but nothing particularly noteworthy.
If you're playing a game that supports DLSS and enable it, using DLSS Quality mode tends to have similar image fidelity to non-DLSS native rendering (or potentially even better fidelity in some cases), you can get significantly more performance from the RTX cards. For example, Watch Dogs Legion runs at 51 fps instead of 31 fps. There are plenty of games that don't support DLSS, but most games with ray tracing do — because it's pretty much required if you want high performance.
Compared to AMD's top offerings, the RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT, the factory overclocked 3080 cards like the Vulcan end up just a hair ahead of the 6900 XT at 4K ultra. That's largely because memory bandwidth becomes more of a factor, so AMD's large Infinity Cache doesn't help quite as much as at lower resolutions. Its weak showing in Watch Dogs also hurts AMD’s overall position — and that's not even taking into account the difference in ray traced rendering. AMD's GPUs and drivers still don't provide the same image quality as Nvidia's GPUs in that game — which we have to note is promoted by Nvidia. Then again, several other games that favor AMD more, like Valhalla, Borderlands 3, and Dirt 5, are AMD-promoted, so it sort of balances out.
Colorful RTX 3080: 1440p Gaming Performance
Dropping down to 1440p boosts overall performance by 55 percent for the Colorful Vulcan, and roughly similar amounts on the other GPUs. AMD's RX 6000 series cards make up a bit of ground, and some games clearly favor AMD. A few of the games that go the other way are actually promoted (originally) by AMD as well — Far Cry 5 and Strange Brigade, specifically.
Out of our test suite of 13 games, five now average more than 144 fps on the 3080 cards, and the Colorful Vulcan again takes second place among the 3080 models we've tested. Valhalla, Dirt 5, and Watch Dogs Legion remain the most demanding titles in our suite, falling short of 100 fps, and WDL would need DLSS to break 60 fps.
There's still only a 4 percent spread between the fastest and slowest 3080 cards we've tested, which isn't something you'd notice without running a lot of benchmarks. Rather than worrying about the last few percent of performance, we suggest looking at the power and temperature results to decide which card is actually best for your purposes.