RX 7700 XT Matches RTX 4070, RX 6800 Performance In Leaked Time Spy Score

Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT (Image credit: AMD)

AMD's Radeon RX 7700 XT may soon replace the Radeon RX 6800 as one of the best graphics cards. A new leaked Time Spy score has the Radeon RX 7700 XT delivering performance in the same alley as the Radeon RX 6800.

When AMD announced the Radeon RX 7700 XT, the chipmaker wasn't shy to compare it to Nvidia's GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. AMD's internal benchmarks showed the Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforming the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB by up to 31% at native 1440p (2560x1440) resolution at maximum settings. The company also briefly compared the Radeon RX 7700 XT to the Radeon RX 5700 XT, which was an odd choice considering that the latter is a first-generation RDNA graphics card.

For reasons unknown, AMD didn't include an RDNA 2 comparison, which would have been much more interesting since consumers would like to see the advances of RDNA 3 over a similar RDNA 2 product rather than RDNA. We won't have to wait long to find out since the Radeon RX 7700 XT launches on September 6; however, hardware leaker HXL has provided a Radeon RX 7700 XT Time Spy score that gives us a peep into the RDNA 3 graphics card's performance. Remember that 3DMark Time Spy is a synthetic benchmark, and the real-world performance may vary. So throw some salt over the leaked result.

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT Time Spy Benchmark

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Graphics CardTime Spy ScoreGPU CoresRT CoresMemoryMemory BusMemory Bandwidth (GB/s)TDP (W)MSRP
Radeon RX 6800 XT19,5174,6087216GB GDDR6256 bit512300$649
GeForce RTX 407017,8405,8884612GB GDDR6X192 bit504200$599
Radeon RX 7700 XT17,0003,4565412GB GDDR6192 bit432245$449
Radeon RX 680016,4663,8406016GB GDDR6256 bit512250$579
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB13,3554,3523416GB GDDR6128 bit288165$499

The Time Spy graphics scores for the other graphics cards are from 3DMark's database.

According to HXL, the Radeon RX 7700 XT's Time Spy graphics score is in the ballpark of 17,000 points. If accurate, the Radeon RX 7700 XT is around 3.2% faster than the Radeon RX 6800. The Radeon RX 7700 XT may not be too far from the GeForce RTX 4070, which only had a 5% higher score. The RDNA 3 graphics card had a 27.3% higher score than the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT's performance looks about right. Based on the specifications and the generation-over-generation performance uplifts we've seen in the past, we estimated that the Radeon RX 7700 XT would perform very closely to the Radeon RX 6800. The Radeon RX 6800 isn't so far behind the GeForce RTX 4070. If AMD makes the Radeon RX 7700 XT a bit faster, the graphics card has the potential to catch up to the GeForce RTX 4070.

(Image credit: HXL/X)

We know the Navi 32 silicon will power the Radeon RX 7700 XT and the Radeon RX 7800 XT. Like Navi 31 (Plum Bonito), Navi 32 (Wheat Nas) also leverages TSMC's N5 process node for the GCD (Graphics Complex Die) and the N6 process node for the MCDs (Memory Chiplet Dies). AMD hasn't officially revealed the die size for the Navi 32 silicon. Luckily, in addition to leaking the Time Spy score, HXL also shared a GPU-Z screenshot of the Radeon RX 7700 XT.

Navi 32 seemingly measures 346 mm², only 3.3% larger than Navi 22 (Navy Flounder) found inside SKUs, such as the Radeon RX 6700 XT. It's 8.7% smaller than Nvidia's AD103 (Ada Lovelace), which Nvidia utilized for the GeForce RTX 4080.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT and Radeon RX 7800 XT will hit the retail market on September 6 for $499 and $449, respectively. With Navi 32, AMD has finally completed the company's RDNA 3 portfolio. The chipmaker has confirmed that it has no plans to release new RDNA 3 ASICs. However, the company did leave the door open for different versions, likely based on the current lineup of ASICs.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor and Memory Reviewer

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Makaveli
    "If AMD makes the Radeon RX 7700 XT a bit faster, the graphics card has the potential to catch up to the GeForce RTX 4070."

    The AIB models should have this covered.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Not bad... 5w less tdp than a rx6800...
    My 6700xt works with 150w :)
    Will wait the 7800xt to see if have better power ratio
    Reply
  • Gauche Cockney
    RX 7700xt is embarrassing when it compares to RX 6800,
    Single digit rasterization gain meanwhile bus and VRAM get nerfed
    Also RX6800 is cheaper
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    Gauche Cockney said:
    RX 7700xt is embarrassing when it compares to RX 6800,
    Single digit rasterization gain meanwhile bus and VRAM get nerfed
    Also RX6800 is cheaper

    This whole gen is embarrassing....

    Also, there's something misleading about the article title since the RX6800 hits around 15000 points in TS and the RTX 4070 around 18000 (same as 6800XT). It would be beastly if AMD made a 4070 competitor at $400........ But that's probably gonna be the 7800XT at $500 and that's really meh when the 6950XT is $600 and the 7900XT around $700 allready. I don't know.. if I'm saving I would choose 6700XT for 1440/60, and if I'm spending I'd go 7900XT for 1440/HR and 4K. If I could.not.afford the 7900XY but wantes that extra juice beyond what the 6700XT offers then the RX6800 is certainly enough for 1440p gaming which is what I would pick anyday over the 4070 or 7800
    Reply
  • NaviiX
    Gauche Cockney said:
    RX 7700xt is embarrassing when it compares to RX 6800,
    Single digit rasterization gain meanwhile bus and VRAM get nerfed
    Also RX6800 is cheaper
    I just sold a RX 6800 red devil for 370 with free shipping. I guess the only thing it misses out on, versus the 7700xt, is anti lag + or hyper RX and av1 encode. Seen some sell on ebay for less than 340 with shipping. Obviously used products have risks but more vram and the same performance for significantly less.

    7700xt will probably drop to 400 relatively fast. First impressions of FSR3 seem good so maybe they can convince people to buy 7700xt/7800xt when prices drop. Just feels silly of AMD to do these high launch prices the last few generations.
    Reply
  • ilukey77
    Gauche Cockney said:
    RX 7700xt is embarrassing when it compares to RX 6800,
    Single digit rasterization gain meanwhile bus and VRAM get nerfed
    Also RX6800 is cheaper
    The 6800 is running out of stock as it will soon be not available so relying on old cards now is a moot point !!
    ( Yes they are still around but wont be for much longer )

    despite the slides AMD showed how the 7800xt trades blows with the 4070ti this is just clever marketing the whole product stack has shifted due to the 4090 having no competitor and the 4070ti ( 4080 12gb being rejected as a 4080 )

    So after the shuffle basically the 7900xtx is the new 6800xt because it trades blows with the 4080 which the 6800xt traded blows with the 3080 and the stack filters down from there 7900xt VS 4070ti and the 7800xt VS the 4060ti 16gb !!

    The 7800xt is not made to compete with the 4070ti or 4070 at its price point its made to compete with the 4060ti 16gb which i think it will beat it by quite a bit the 7700xt exists purely to upsell to the 7800xt for the extra $50usd but made to compete with the 4060 8gb rubbish so i see a price drop incoming soon ..

    People have forgotten the price point of everything this gen its all gone up but if you match price with price the 7800xt VS the 4060ti 16gb !!
    Reply
  • Colif
    There isn't enough difference between the 4060 TI 8gb & 16gb for AMD to make two cards to compete against it

    this video compares both versions, the extra vram is about the only difference in performance.
    _-j1vdMV1Ccthere are more differences between the AMD cards.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    I will reserve judgement till benchmarks and reviews are out, however, anyone who has an RX6800 or XT shouldn't be looking to upgrade anyway. A good GPU should last you a few generations, if you have to upgrade GPUs every generation then you are not buying the right product for you.
    Reply
  • Colif
    Elusive Ruse said:
    I will reserve judgement till benchmarks and reviews are out, however, anyone who has an RX6800 or XT shouldn't be looking to upgrade anyway. A good GPU should last you a few generations, if you have to upgrade GPUs every generation then you are not buying the right product for you.
    I agree but comparisons and common sense don't match up. People want to see if they are better but at same time, it is a waste of money buying a new card every generation... and yet... just watch people with 4090 buy a 5090 next time. Some people just need to have the best... even if "best" is a fleeting thing, and expensive to maintain. I generally try to aim a little lower than best as the value is normally better.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Elusive Ruse said:
    I will reserve judgement till benchmarks and reviews are out, however, anyone who has an RX6800 or XT shouldn't be looking to upgrade anyway. A good GPU should last you a few generations, if you have to upgrade GPUs every generation then you are not buying the right product for you.
    I would only move from the 6800XT to a 7900XTX which is what I did and it's about a 50% improvement in performance.

    And if one practices the art of the GPU flip you can do it every gen. I will ride this train sometimes and other times I will sit and hold.

    I didn't wait for my 6800XT to drop in value and sold it at $600 CAD in April. So my cost to upgrade was only $600. However, you have to have the money upfront to buy the new GPU.
    Reply