Thermalright Assassin X 120 R SE Review: Quiet entry-level cooling for less than $20

Is a $20 Cooler from Thermalright enough to tame an i7-14700K? You might be surprised!

Thermalright Assassin X 120 R SE
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

If you’re building a PC with a strict budget, Thermalright’s Assassin X 120 R SE provides essential cooling performance that’s sufficient for most users, along with low noise levels.

Pros

  • +

    Essential cooling performance sufficient for most users

  • +

    Low noise levels

  • +

    Available for less than $20 USD

Cons

  • -

    Fan clips are a bit flimsy, but it’s $20

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Thermalright is well-known by PC enthusiasts in recent years, for pushing the bar of both performance and value with its low-cost air coolers. I consider their Phantom Spirit 120 to have the best overall value on the market when you consider performance, cost, and noise levels. 

With this review we’re looking at one of Thermalright’s cheapest desktop coolers, the Assassin X 120 R SE. This is a basic, entry-level cooler with a single-tower radiator, four copper heatpipes, and a single 120mm fan. 

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

This cooler won’t make our list of best CPU coolers, but it is definitely a great value in entry-level cooling.  Let’s take a quick look at the unit’s specifications, then we’ll dive into its features and the testing.

Cooler specifications

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CoolerThermalright Assassin X 120 R SE
MSRP$19.90 USD
Heatsink MaterialAluminum
Rated LifespanUnlisted
Socket CompatibilityIntel Socket LGA 1851/1700/1200/115x AMD AM5 / AM4
BaseFour 6mm Direct Touch Copper Heatpipes
Average Maximum TDP (Our Testing)~225W with Intel’s i7-14700K
Heatsink Dimensions148 mm (H) x 46 mm (W) x 120 mm (D)
WarrantyUnlisted

Packing and included contents

The packaging for this cooler is fairly basic, as to be expected for a low-cost product.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Opening the box reveals the cooler and fan, protected by a combination of molded foam and plastic wrap.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Included with the cooler are the following:

  • 1x 120mm fan
  • Tube of Thermalright TF4 thermal paste
  • Single-tower heatsink with four direct-touch heatpipes
  • Mounting for modern Intel and AMD platforms
  • Installation manual

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Features of the Assassin X 120 R SE

▶ Four 6mm direct-touch copper heatpipes

Direct-touch heatpipes are incorporated into this design to most-effectively transfer heat away from the CPU.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Low noise levels

This cooler runs quietly in all workloads, with a maximum noise level of 41.9 dBA. 

Thermalright TF4 thermal grease

Thermalright includes a tube of their TF4 thermal grease for use with the Assassin X 120 R SE. This is an entry-level paste from Thermalright, but it still performs rather well – only 3 degrees Celsius behind the best performing pastes we’ve benchmarked in our thermal paste tests.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Low price

You won’t find many coolers with a cheaper price than the Assassin X 120 R SE. It has an official MSRP of $19.90 USD, but can often be found for as cheap as $15 at Amazon and other retailers.

TL-C12C 120mm fan

There’s more to a cooler than just the heatsink or radiator. The bundled fans have a significant impact on cooling and noise levels, as well as how the cooler looks in your case. Thermalright includes one of their TL-C12C 120mm fans with the Assassin X 120 R SE. It is a very basic fan, but it provides essential cooling with low noise levels.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
ModelThermalright TL-C12C
Dimensions120 x 120 x 25mm
Fan SpeedUp to 1550 RPM ± 10%
Air FlowUp to 66.17 CFM
Air PressureUp to 1.53 mmH2O
Bearing TypeS-FDB
LightingNone

Testing Methodology, and how my testing differs vs the competition

I do a few things to ensure my results are useful. To begin, I strictly regulate the ambient temperature to 23 degrees C during testing. I do not accept results at 22 or 24C as valid, even though in theory there won’t be much of a difference. 

Some reviewers test CPU Coolers on an open test bench, the idea being to remove any variables other than the cooler. The problem with this type of testing is that with typical usage – you know, with an enclosed case – the ambient temperature within will be higher than that of outside air, which adds difficulty to the cooler’s job.

Some test CPU coolers using a thermal plate instead of using a CPU. This suffers from all the drawbacks of open bench testing, but also doesn’t effectively emulate the heat from a CPU. A thermal plate generally evenly distributes heat, with a low overall thermal density. CPUs, on the other hand, have most of their heat generated in concentrated hotspots, making them much more difficult to cool.

Older CPUs are also poor candidates for cooler testing for similar reasons – they were produced with larger manufacturing processes and may have lower thermal density in their hotspots as a result.

The problem with CPU-only testing

Testing with CPU only loads provides useful information, but it doesn’t paint a complete picture of how a cooler will perform. Many workloads, especially gaming, will stress both the CPU and GPU. 

To test how well a CPU’s cooler will perform in these situations, I’ve added two tests: one with a light CPU and one with a moderate CPU load – both while running a full load on the GPU.

Testing configuration – Intel LGA1700 platform

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPUIntel Core i7-14700K
MotherboardMSI Z790 Project Zero
CaseMSI Pano 100L PZ Black
System FansIceberg Thermal IceGale Silent
PSUSilverstone HELA 1300

There are many factors other than the CPU cooler that can influence your cooling performance, including the case you use and the fans installed in it. A system's motherboard can also influence this, especially if it suffers from bending, which results in poor cooler contact with the CPU. 

In order to prevent bending from impacting our cooling results, we’ve installed Thermalright’s LGA 1700 contact frame into our testing rig. If your motherboard is affected by bending, your thermal results will be worse than those shown below. Not all motherboards are affected equally by this issue. I tested Raptor Lake CPUs in two motherboards. And while one of them showed significant thermal improvements after installing Thermalright’s LGA1700 contact frame, the other motherboard showed no difference in temperatures whatsoever! Check out our review of the contact frame for more information.

LGA 1700 Installation

1. Place the backplate against the rear of the motherboard, underneath the CPU.

2. Place the blue rubber standoffs on top of the CPU cooler mounting holes.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

3. Place the mounting bars on top of the blue standoffs and secure them with the included screws.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

4. Apply the included Thermalright TF4 thermal paste to the top of the CPU. If you’re unsure of how to do this, check out our guide on how to apply thermal paste.

5. Place the heatsink on top of the CPU and secure it with a screwdriver.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

6. Attach the TL-C12C fan to the heatsink using the included fan clips. Then connect its PWM cord to your motherboard and installation is complete.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • thestryker
    I would be really curious to see how this compares to one of their single towers that have an actual cold plate instead of direct contact heatpipes. The Assassin X 120 V2 for example runs in the same general price range.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    thestryker said:
    I would be really curious to see how this compares to one of their single towers that have an actual cold plate instead of direct contact heatpipes. The Assassin X 120 V2 for example runs in the same general price range.
    That's something to consider. I believe that the direct-touch bases tend to be more effective, but it is definitely worth investigating.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Albert.Thomas said:
    That's something to consider. I believe that the direct-touch bases tend to be more effective, but it is definitely worth investigating.
    I've heard it both ways over the years with the potential disadvantage of direct being a combination of surface area and even thermal transfer. I can't think of any other time where there were very similar coolers where a like for like comparison could be made though.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Whoah nice result for a 20 dollar heat sink...
    Need retest with other fan to see what this heatsink can make... :)
    Reply
  • Notton
    If I recall correctly, direct contact heatpipes work well when all pipes cover the length of the CPU, but worse when they don't.
    AM4/5 with offset CCD might run hotter with an Assassin X 120 because of the die layout, but a monolithic rectangle Raptor Lake would see full benefits.
    Reply