Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro V and Dark Rock Elite Review: Kings of Quiet Cooling

Can you hear that? No? I didn’t think so.

Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro V and Dark Rock Elite
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Be Quiet’s Dark Rock Pro V and Elite raise the bar for quiet cooling performance, offering the best performance from any low-noise coolers we’ve tested.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    The quietest high-end coolers we’ve tested

  • +

    Better thermal results than the Dark Rock Pro 4

  • +

    SFF compatible

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Expensive

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

It’s been a long time since we’ve had any new air coolers from be quiet! (henceforth referred to as Be Quiet) on our test bench. We looked at the Dark Rock Pro 4 way back in 2018. The German company is well known among PC enthusiasts for its AIO and air cooling products, as well high-end computer cases like the Shadow Base 800 FX and Silent Base 802. Cooling enthusiasts have been waiting patiently for the successor to Be Quiet’s Dark Rock Pro 4, but they don’t have to wait any longer – today’s review will examine Be Quiet’s latest high-end air coolers, the Dark Rock Pro 5 and Dark Rock Elite. Since heatsinks on both are the same and the only differences are the fans and cover, we’re testing them both together.

Competition this year in air cooling has been fierce. Products like DeepCool’s Assassin IV and Thermalright’s Frost Commander 140 have raised our expectations for quality air cooling. Do the improvements made by Be Quiet’s engineers elevate the Dark Rocks’ performance enough to best its tough competition and earn a spot on our best coolers list? We’ll have to put it through our cooling and noise testing to find out. But first, here are the coolers’ specifications, direct from Be Quiet!

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • helper800
    At this point I think I am going to have to buy Albert the Arctic cooler components I want him to test. The Arctic freezer II 360mm and 420mm AIOs are not on any of the charts unfortunately.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    helper800 said:
    At this point I think I am going to have to buy Albert the Arctic cooler components I want him to test. The Arctic freezer II 360mm and 420mm AIOs are not on any of the charts unfortunately.
    I have thought about re-testing the LF2 series, but unlike other companies Arctic knows how to count to three ;)

    Maybe I'll have to pull out the LF2 360 at that time :P
    Reply
  • Mike500
    Good review about nice coolers. However, one sentence in the Conclusion doesn't quite make sense:

    "Trying to decide between the two? I’d advise spending the extra $10 on the Elite model for stronger cooling. Even in the quiet mode it performs better than the Elite."

    The Elite performs better than the Elite...? 😉
    Reply
  • sam buddy
    @Albert.Thomas

    The charts are a bit messed up methinks. The CPU package ΔΤ @ 175W chart appears twice under 175W Cinebench Results, while the Noise Levels @ Default Fan Curve chart for the 175W Power Limit also appears under the No Power Limits Thermal Results, probably in place of some other chart.


    Thanks for the review and plus one for Arctic cooler reviews.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    sam buddy said:
    @Albert.Thomas

    The charts are a bit messed up methinks. The CPU package ΔΤ @ 175W chart appears twice under 175W Cinebench Results, while the Noise Levels @ Default Fan Curve chart for the 175W Power Limit also appears under the No Power Limits Thermal Results, probably in place of some other chart.


    Thanks for the review and plus one for Arctic cooler reviews.
    It looks like an error occured when they updated the article yesterday, I'll let the editors know ASAP.

    Thank you for the report!
    Reply