Silverstone IceMyst 360 and 240mm AIO Review: Unique VRM and RAM fans, chart-topping noise-normalized performance

Unlike any other competitor, these AIOs have optional stackable VRM and RAM fans that provide additional cooling for your components.

Silverstone IceMyst 360 and 240mm AIO
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Silverstone’s IceMyst AIOs are impressive, packing genuine innovation with their stackable VRM and RAM fans. The thermal performance is good too, delivering our best noise-normalized results yet.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Chart-topping noise normalized performance

  • +

    Innovative stackable VRM and RAM fans

  • +

    Strong overall cooling performance

  • +

    Reasonable price

  • +

    Accessible refill port

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Fans run louder than they need to

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

SilverStone has been busy churning out coolers, power supplies, expansion cards, and other PC equipment since its founding in 2003. The company is perhaps best known for its computer cases, like the SFF Sugo 14 that I currently use for testing SFF coolers. They often offer niche SFF products, like the  Hydrogon H90 ARGB cooler we reviewed last year. With today’s review we’ll be looking at the company’s latest IceMyst 240 and 360mm AIOs, which we first spotted at Computex earlier this year. These coolers sport optional stackable fans that can be directed to any spot near the CPU block. Will these coolers wither under the heat of an Intel i7 CPU, or will they rise to the challenge and possibly even earn a spot on our best AIO CPU Coolers list? We’ll have to put it through testing to be sure, but first we’ll take a quick look at the specifications of the units.

Cooler specifications

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • thestryker
    I'm a little surprised to see the 360mm performing that well and it's great that this cooler isn't just the gimmicks. I've been looking forward to a good review of these coolers because I'm willing to overlook the shorter warranty if the performance is good and additional fans work well.

    I really like the additional fans concept as high performance DDR5 is getting to the point where some active airflow to dissipate heat is important.

    Do we know who the pump OEM is in the case of these AIOs? I know in the past they'd used Apaltek, but haven't seen it mentioned one way or another in more recent cooler reviews.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    thestryker said:
    I really like the additional fans concept as high performance DDR5 is getting to the point where some active airflow to dissipate heat is important.
    Eh, I don't know if I'd say it's important. For most users active cooling on the RAM will be pointless, though those trying to maintain the fastest possible speeds overclocking RAM might find it useful.

    I'd say this would be more relevant for users who bought a motherboard only to find its VRMs lacking, adding one of these side fans could help in a situation like that.
    thestryker said:

    Do we know who the pump OEM is in the case of these AIOs? I know in the past they'd used Apaltek, but haven't seen it mentioned one way or another in more recent cooler reviews.
    Unfortunately I'm not sure about that.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Albert.Thomas said:
    Eh, I don't know if I'd say it's important. For most users active cooling on the RAM will be pointless, though those trying to maintain the fastest possible speeds overclocking RAM might find it useful.
    Yeah it's mostly when getting up around 7800 or more that it becomes a thing. I'm thinking down the road with better memory controllers which may be able to hit 8000+ reliably. Seems like right now with 14th gen 7200 is close to a given with the Apex boards being around 7600. Not that it's a guarantee ARL will end up being that much better it just seems likely with the improvements from 12th to 14th. It's also not impossible that AMD's Zen 5 could benefit more from high memory clocks.

    I was surprised watching some of Buildzoid's videos and him talking about needing cooling to maintain stability (his stability tests are pretty extreme though). That wasn't particularly a thing with DDR4 unless you were going for peak overclock.
    Reply
  • Toliandar
    Needs an AMD cpu review because there are differences between them, at least for the last 2 generations, which means the performance for one does not match the other.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    necro
    Reply