AMD Strix Halo Ryzen AI MAX 395+ laptop chip matches the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X in leaked benchmark — 16-core APU rumored to power Asus' upcoming ROG Flow Z13 laptop
On par with the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X.
The upcoming Ryzen AI MAX 395+ from AMD's Ryzen 300 or Zen 5 family of APUs has emerged at Geekbench with performance that's largely identical to the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X processor — at least in short bursts. The 395+ is seen powering the upcoming ROG Flow Z13 laptop from Asus, expected to debut at CES next month. Against the last-gen Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD has managed to extract a massive 22% performance uplift with Strix Halo.
The enthusiast laptop market will soon be greeted by AMD's flagship APUs codenamed "Strix Halo" under the Ryzen AI MAX Pro lineup. Likely to arrive at CES, these APUs reportedly serve as a one-stop solution for workstation laptops uniting Zen 5 cores with a powerful RDNA 3.5 iGPU (Integrated GPU) on a single chip.
Rumor has it that the top-end Radeon 8060S may be configured with up to 40 CUs (Compute Units) with support for fast LPDDR5X-8000 memory. Strix Halo is a one-of-a-kind product and should not be confused with the flagship-grade Fire Range series, succeeding Dragon Range (Ryzen 7045HX).
The test bench features the Asus ROG Flow Z13 "GZ302EA," listings for which surfaced a few days ago at a Belarusian retailer. Geekbench reports the Ryzen AI MAX 395+ with 16 cores and 32 threads based on AMD's Zen 5 architecture. The CPU offers a base frequency of 3 GHz, going as high as 5.1 GHz. Much like 16-core desktop chips from AMD, the 395+ is equipped with 64MB of L3 cache and 16MB of L2 cache.
Impressive scores of 2928 points and 19484 points in the single-core and multi-core categories, respectively, land the Ryzen AI MAX 395+ largely on par with the Ryzen 9 7950X. The limited clock speeds prevent it from breaching the 3,000 barrier when it comes to single-core performance. However, multi-core sees it pass with flying colors, beating the Ryzen 9 7945HX by 22%. Notably, the relatively short-duration Geekbench benchmark leads to ideal scores for the chip, as the chip will heat up and likely slow as it runs longer-duration benchmarks.
CPU | Single-Core | Multi-Core |
---|---|---|
Ryzen AI MAX 395+ | 2928 | 19484 |
Ryzen 9 7945HX | 2738 | 15921 |
Ryzen 9 7950X | 2984 | 19438 |
Realistically, Strix Halo has no direct equivalent from Intel's side and is more targeted as a competitor to Apple's M-series chips. It wouldn't make sense to compare Arrow Lake versus Strix Halo as the latter employs a much larger integrated GPU. Judging from the leaks, the Radeon 8060S powering the graphical end of the 395+ offers 40 CUs, which is 25% more than the Radeon RX 7600. If priced accordingly, this configuration could give upcoming RTX 5060 laptops a run for their money.
AMD is expected to reveal Strix Halo alongside Krackan Point and the RDNA 4 family at CES next month.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
salgado18 The sad thing about these big laptop CPUs is that all of them are paired with dedicated GPUs. Programmers and others who only need a fast CPU but little GPU have to pay extra for underused hardware.Reply -
Notton For comparison, the 2023 model with i9-13900H+RTX4060 did 2600 single / 13400 multi in geekbench.Reply
I think that model cost around $2100 usd -
usertests The CPU perf doesn't matter, it was obviously going to be around the 7950X, basically the same as Fire Range.Reply
The GPU is the important part. I guess it's a win if it can match or exceed the 7600 XT. And efficiency matters since Strix Halo is for laptops first.
I find it hard to believe there will be many Strix Halo devices paired with discrete GPUs. If you wanted a dGPU, you'd just get Fire Range which should be about the same CPU as Strix Halo (up to 16x Zen 5 using desktop chiplets) but cheaper. Too bad if that's often paired with dGPUs. We've seen Dragon Range (Zen 4 version) in mini PCs with no discrete.salgado18 said:The sad thing about these big laptop CPUs is that all of them are paired with dedicated GPUs. Programmers and others who only need a fast CPU but little GPU have to pay extra for underused hardware. -
salgado18
CPU performance always matters to someone, otherwise it wouldn't be news. But I believe you mean for gaming, in which case a 16 core CPU is a waste of resources.usertests said:The CPU perf doesn't matter, it was obviously going to be around the 7950X, basically the same as Fire Range.
The GPU is the important part. I guess it's a win if it can match or exceed the 7600 XT. And efficiency matters since Strix Halo is for laptops first.
I have never seen (in my country or in news, at least) notebooks with 35W+ TDP not paired with a GPU. All notebooks using integrated graphics go for slim designs, using low-wattage processors. Which, in my view, is a shame.usertests said:I find it hard to believe there will be many Strix Halo devices paired with discrete GPUs. If you wanted a dGPU, you'd just get Fire Range which should be about the same CPU as Strix Halo (up to 16x Zen 5 using desktop chiplets) but cheaper. Too bad if that's often paired with dGPUs. We've seen Dragon Range (Zen 4 version) in mini PCs with no discrete. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell "At least in short bursts"Reply
"In Geekbench"
So the performance in the real world as compared to the 7950X is very much in question. So clickbaity... -
Elusive Ruse The 9950X has trouble matching the 7950X I will believe it when I see it taken to task by reviewers.Reply -
usertests
Definitely in the case of gaming. But in general a modern 16-core is overkill for a lot of use cases. GPU performance is the key for most use cases of Strix Halo. And Fire Range should achieve the same if not better CPU performance, without the big iGPU.salgado18 said:CPU performance always matters to someone, otherwise it wouldn't be news. But I believe you mean for gaming, in which case a 16 core CPU is a waste of resources.
Because it's using desktop chiplets, there's a question of if we'll see X3D variants sometime in the future.
Strix Halo is using a new, massive "FP11" BGA package, 5.5% larger than the package used by Dragon/Fire Range. It could also take up more laptop board area by being surrounded by memory packages, since it is quad-channel (256-bit memory bus).salgado18 said:I have never seen (in my country or in news, at least) notebooks with 35W+ TDP not paired with a GPU. All notebooks using integrated graphics go for slim designs, using low-wattage processors. Which, in my view, is a shame.
https://www.techpowerup.com/324271/amd-strix-halo-a-large-rectangular-bga-package-the-size-of-an-lga1700-processor
Strix Halo will be the first case in which a flagship chip is not paired with dGPUs, since it should have performance similar to a mobile 4070/5060 (I'm guessing here).
Any OEM that wants to pair an AMD 16-core with a discrete (Nvidia) GPU should use Fire Range instead. Maybe there's some reason for a Strix Halo + dGPU combo but it would be an oddity.
There may not be many choices anyway, since this is an experimental new product for AMD. Example, an ASUS lineup leak:
https://videocardz.com/newz/asus-rog-gaming-laptops-with-geforce-rtx-5090-and-rtx-5080-gpus-listed-online
Out of 28 high-end SKUs, 1 is Strix Halo with no dGPU, the other 27 are using Intel/AMD APUs and Nvidia dGPUs. -
shady28 I've mostly stayed out of the discussions on who has the worst cpu 'naming convention', but I have to say "Strix Halo Ryzen AI MAX 395+ " has to be one of the worst cpu names in existence.Reply -
Alvar "Miles" Udell
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-U6780Ashady28 said:I've mostly stayed out of the discussions on who has the worst cpu 'naming convention', but I have to say "Strix Halo Ryzen AI MAX 395+ " has to be one of the worst cpu names in existence. -
heffeque
You're basically are confusing Strix Halo (55-120 W) with Strix Point (15-54 W). They are 2 different segments.salgado18 said:CPU performance always matters to someone, otherwise it wouldn't be news. But I believe you mean for gaming, in which case a 16 core CPU is a waste of resources.
I have never seen (in my country or in news, at least) notebooks with 35W+ TDP not paired with a GPU. All notebooks using integrated graphics go for slim designs, using low-wattage processors. Which, in my view, is a shame.
If you want the best laptop CPU performance but with a very basic iGPU, you will have Fire Range (Dragon Range's successor). Both Dragon Range and Fire Range are laptop CPU to use with a powerful discrete GPU.