Meteor Lake-PS CPUs will be the first chips to use Intel's LGA1851 socket

Mini-ITX Meteor Lake PS
Mini-ITX Meteor Lake PS (Image credit: Premio Inc.)

A discovery by hardware detective momomo_us shows that Intel will launch a new variant of Meteor Lake processors for the new LGA1851 socket. Contrary to prior rumors, Arrow Lake, which will fight for a spot on the list of best CPUs, might not be the first processor to employ the LGA1851 socket.

Before Intel released Meteor Lake, opinions were divided on whether the chipmaker would release the 7nm processors on the desktop. During the official announcement, Intel confirmed that Meteor Lake would be an exclusive architecture for mobile platforms.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • CmdrShepard
    Great, more e-waste. Thanks, Intel!
    Reply
  • Notton
    CmdrShepard said:
    Great, more e-waste. Thanks, Intel!
    I don't understand how it's e-waste?

    SBCs using x86 mobile CPUs have existed for over a decade now. Essentially, they are NUCs without the casing.
    Reply
  • usertests
    What is Meteor Lake-N? A rebrand?
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    usertests said:
    What is Meteor Lake-N? A rebrand?
    Based on the picture and the subtitle saying SBC with Intel Alder Lake N Series, it unfortunately appears you are right
    Reply
  • usertests said:
    What is Meteor Lake-N? A rebrand?

    No, definitely not a rebrand. These N-Series processors are usually designed for low-powered and affordable slimline notebooks/desktops, where "efficiency" is the sole concern, alongside performance per watt.

    They are based on the same CPU microarchitecture, which Intel uses for it's efficiency/atom (E) cores. I have seen several N-series chips targeted mainly towards entry-level notebooks, Chromebooks, and also for low-power customers.

    Like e.g., the Alder Lake-N chips use the "Gracemont" cores, the same core architecture Intel uses for efficiency/E cores in its 12/13th gen lineup. So Meteor Lake-N should also follow the same path.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Metal Messiah. said:
    No, definitely not a rebrand.
    A rebrand of Alder Lake-N. I know WTF Alder Lake-N is thank you very much.

    Meteor Lake-H/U uses Crestmont E-cores, so if Meteor Lake-N is using the same 8-core Gracemont die clocked up 100 MHz, that would be a disappointment. And that is a good guess based on the subtitle in the picture.

    It's not like Crestmont is a huge improvement either, just that a full revision of the Atom lineup could make other changes.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    usertests said:
    A rebrand of Alder Lake-N. I know WTF Alder Lake-N is thank you very much.

    Meteor Lake-H/U uses Crestmont E-cores, so if Meteor Lake-N is using the same 8-core Gracemont die clocked up 100 MHz, that would be a disappointment. And that is a good guess based on the subtitle in the picture.

    It's not like Crestmont is a huge improvement either, just that a full revision of the Atom lineup could make other changes.
    I think the point is more that Intel doesn't do what you're describing so it doesn't make any sense to put credence into what the slide shows being accurate. They're not bashful about single generations using different core designs, but they don't fake code names when doing so.
    Reply
  • usertests
    thestryker said:
    I think the point is more that Intel doesn't do what you're describing so it doesn't make any sense to put credence into what the slide shows being accurate. They're not bashful about single generations using different core designs, but they don't fake code names when doing so.
    There's already been a leak of "Twin Lake" being a minor refresh of Alder Lake-N, and now we have a "Meteor Lake-N" image showing "Alder Lake N Series" inside.

    I would put nothing past Intel, their naming schemes are a mess.
    Reply
  • CmdrShepard
    Notton said:
    I don't understand how it's e-waste?

    SBCs using x86 mobile CPUs have existed for over a decade now. Essentially, they are NUCs without the casing.
    I was referring to the ever-changing number of pins and new socket layouts -- they just can't let a single CPU socket last for more than 2 years in consumer space.
    Reply
  • Notton
    CmdrShepard said:
    I was referring to the ever-changing number of pins and new socket layouts -- they just can't let a single CPU socket last for more than 2 years in consumer space.
    Well at least this new socket has additional features, like an additional x4 PCIe 5.0 lanes.
    You no longer have to drop your GPU down to x8 connection when you plug in a Gen5 NVMe SSD.
    Reply