ASRock doubles memory on AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT — budget gaming GPU has 8GB GDDR6 for $169

Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC
Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC (Image credit: ASRock)

Despite not having a place on our list of best graphics cards, the Radeon RX 6500 XT has stuck around for a while now — and ASRock has just launched the Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC (RX6500XT PG 8GO), a custom version of the GPU with twice as much memory as the original.

Like any custom Radeon RX 6500 XT, ASRock's iteration features the same Navi 24 (Beige Goby) silicon with 16 enabled Compute Units (CUs), amounting to 1,024 shaders. The Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC has a factory overclock, meaning the shaders run at 2,420 MHz — 4.8% faster than the reference specifications. ASRock has binned the graphics card's game clock and boost clock for 2,685 MHz and 2,825 MHz, representing a 2.9% and 0.4% uplift.

Modern games look better than ever, but they also require more graphics power and more memory. The original Radeon RX 6500 XT only has 4GB of GDDR6 memory at 18 Gb/s, which is underwhelming by today's standards. So, ASRock has infused the Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC with twice as much memory. The chips still run at 18 Gb/s via a 64-bit memory interface, so the memory bandwidth remains at 143.9 GB/s. So while the Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC has more memory, it doesn't offer more bandwidth — and that's a potentially serious problem.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC sports a dual-slot design with a length of up to 9.4 inches (240mm), so it's not intrusive. Being a budget graphics card, it lacks RGB lighting — but that's a plus in many people's books. It features a good-looking metallic backplate that matches the design theme. The materials are very high quality, as ASRock utilizes high-density glass fabric for the PCB and premium 90A power chokes. The graphics card stays cool thanks to the dual-fan cooler with a semi-passive cooling implementation, where the fans stay off until the temperature reaches a certain threshold.

The graphics card slides into a PCIe 4.0 x16 physical slot, with an x4 data connection, and an 8-pin PCIe power connector is required in addition to the expansion slot. The reference Radeon RX 6500 XT has a 107W TDP. Although ASRock doesn't expose the Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC's TDP, it should be slightly higher due to the factory overclock and memory upgrade. Nonetheless, a 400W power supply is sufficient to feed the budget RDNA 2 graphics card.

As for display output options, you can choose between an HDMI 2.1 port and DisplayPort 1.4a output with HBR3 and DSC support. It's not a lot, but the graphics card can handle up to two simultaneous monitors and resolutions up to 8K (7680 x 4320).

The real issue here is one of performance and features. The RX 6500 XT only has 16 CUs (compute units) and 1024 GPU shader cores — plus the very limited bandwidth from the 64-bit interface. A small step up gets you to the RX 6600, which has a 128-bit interface and 56% more bandwidth, plus twice as much Infinity Cache to further increase the effective bandwidth. It also has 28 CUs and 55% more compute, with a TBP that's only 19W higher.

The vanilla Radeon RX 6500 XT currently starts at $139.99, while the faster Radeon RX 6600 sells for as low as $189.99. ASRock's Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC retails for $169.99 on Newegg. Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3050 also continues to be available, starting at $199.99. There may be a place for a Radeon RX 6500 XT with twice the memory, but given the proximity to superior GPUs like the RX 6600, price needs to drop quite a bit to make this worth considering.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor and Memory Reviewer

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Pretty weak GPU due to it's god-awful "64-bit" Memory bus width ! Not to mention the 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes as well (I know this might not matter much for gaming), and only 16MB on-die SRAM for Navi 24.

    But basically, Navi 24 was meant to be used as a Laptop/Mobile discrete chip. For desktop use as a gaming GPU it's even worse. It's doesn't matter if this card sports 8GB VRAM as well.

    Expect poor/sub-par performance at least in some bandwidth-starved games, if not all.

    But anyway, history repeats again. Because this isn't the first 6500 XT GPU with 8GB VRAM. Nope.

    SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT. Released July 2022.

    https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt-8g-gddr6
    1551553081153921024View: https://x.com/SapphireTech/status/1551553081153921024

    Chinese brand PELADN also released their own variant last year in July, dubbed RX 6500 XT ARMOR.

    https://www.ithome.com/0/709/340.htm
    https://media.overclock3d.net/2023/09/chinese-manufacturer-peladn-gives-amds-radeon-rx-6500-xt-an-8gb-memory-upgrade_64fef103ae788.jpeg
    https://img.ithome.com/newsuploadfiles/2023/7/a307bfb4-5a54-4c01-ad8a-343c09e1f2fc.jpg?x-bce-process=image/quality,q_75/format,f_webp
    Reply
  • usertests
    At this price, I'd pick up a 3050 6GB instead, which is going to have similar performance (I referred to a TechPowerUp chart instead of a review), 75W PCIe power only, DLSS support, and PCIe 4.0 x8 instead of PCIe 4.0 x4 (better for an old PCIe 3.0 system).

    Oh, and it has intact media decode/encode support, unlike the 6500 XT.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Metal Messiah. said:
    Pretty weak GPU due to it's god-awful "64-bit" Memory bus width ! Not to mention the 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes as well (I know this might not matter much for gaming), and only 16MB on-die SRAM for Navi 24.

    But basically, Navi 24 was meant to be used as a Laptop/Mobile discrete chip. For desktop use as a gaming GPU it's even worse. It's doesn't matter if this card sports 8GB VRAM as well.

    Expect poor/sub-par performance at least in some bandwidth-starved games, if not all.

    But anyway, history repeats again. Because this isn't the first 6500 XT GPU with 8GB VRAM. Nope.

    SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT. Released July 2022.

    https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt-8g-gddr6
    1551553081153921024View: https://x.com/SapphireTech/status/1551553081153921024

    Chinese brand PELADN also released their own variant last year in July, dubbed RX 6500 XT ARMOR.

    https://www.ithome.com/0/709/340.htm
    https://media.overclock3d.net/2023/09/chinese-manufacturer-peladn-gives-amds-radeon-rx-6500-xt-an-8gb-memory-upgrade_64fef103ae788.jpeg
    https://img.ithome.com/newsuploadfiles/2023/7/a307bfb4-5a54-4c01-ad8a-343c09e1f2fc.jpg?x-bce-process=image/quality,q_75/format,f_webp

    asrocks version is more then a memory upgrade on there page it runs at x8 and yes its on a 64 bit bus still.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    usertests said:
    At this price, I'd pick up a 3050 6GB instead, which is going to have similar performance (I referred to a TechPowerUp chart instead of a review), 75W PCIe power only, DLSS support, and PCIe 4.0 x8 instead of PCIe 4.0 x4 (better for an old PCIe 3.0 system).

    Oh, and it has intact media decode/encode support, unlike the 6500 XT.

    while i agree the 3050 6gb is better.

    they are both 4.0 x8

    and the 6500 xt is slightly faster memory wise.

    they clearly have excess stock and are just trying to tweak the chips that work.

    price needs to be like 130 in uk for this thing to even move though
    Reply
  • beyondlogic said:
    asrocks version is more then a memory upgrade on there page it runs at x8 and yes its on a 64 bit bus still.

    Yes, I have seen that mention on one page, and even this Tom's article had it listed as x8, but now they have edited it, and I think the ASRock specs are wrong as well, at least on the OC page. It's a typo error.

    Because here it says: PCI Express4.0 x4. And the specs totally match with the OC variant.

    To quote this article:

    "The Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC has a factory overclock, meaning the shaders run at 2,420 MHz — 4.8% faster than the reference specifications. ASRock has binned the graphics card's game clock and boost clock for 2,685 MHz and 2,825 MHz, representing a 2.9% and 0.4% uplift."
    https://pg.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB/#Specification


    On this page, it says, - PCI® Express 4.0 x8, which IMO is not correct. And these specs listed here as exactly the same as above.

    https://pg.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC/index.asp#Specification
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Metal Messiah. said:
    Yes, I have seen that mention on one page, and even this Tom's article had it listed as x8, but now they have edited it, and I think the ASRock specs are wrong as well, at least on the OC page. It's a typo error.

    Because here it says: PCI Express4.0 x4. And the specs totally match with the OC variant.

    To quote this article:

    "The Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC has a factory overclock, meaning the shaders run at 2,420 MHz — 4.8% faster than the reference specifications. ASRock has binned the graphics card's game clock and boost clock for 2,685 MHz and 2,825 MHz, representing a 2.9% and 0.4% uplift."
    https://pg.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB/#Specification


    On this page, it says, - PCI® Express 4.0 x8, which IMO is not correct. And these specs listed here as exactly the same as above.

    https://pg.asrock.com/Graphics-Card/AMD/Radeon RX 6500 XT Phantom Gaming 8GB OC/index.asp#Specification

    i have a sneaky suspicion that these chips while named rx 6500 xt are either same silicon but tweaked to have x 8 lanes or are binned chips from another chip like a rx 6600m

    if they can give it more memory e.g ram chips maybe they had to wire more lanes ?
    Reply
  • thestryker
    These would be an okay deal if they were around $100, but missing encoders, limited display output, and the 4 lane limitation makes it a poor alternative to the A310/A380/3050 6GB.
    beyondlogic said:
    i have a sneaky suspicion that these chips while named rx 6500 xt are either same silicon but tweaked to have x 8 lanes or are binned chips from another chip like a rx 6600m

    if they can give it more memory e.g ram chips maybe they had to wire more lanes ?
    It's not, this is Navi 24 which is a completely different GPU. It was intended to be predominantly mobile (maybe workstation as well) which was changed to desktop amidst the crypto boom.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    thestryker said:
    These would be an okay deal if they were around $100, but missing encoders, limited display output, and the 4 lane limitation makes it a poor alternative to the A310/A380/3050 6GB.

    It's not, this is Navi 24 which is a completely different GPU. It was intended to be predominantly mobile (maybe workstation as well) which was changed to desktop amidst the crypto boom.

    im aware its navi 24 im suggesting it could be a very crippled navi 23 mobile rx 6000m either that or it is a typo .

    a310-a380 and a580 all have the weakness of sam or intels equivalent needing to be turned on

    a580 did drop price so i wonder if this amds knee jerk reaction to that.
    Reply
  • mrtwonder
    Metal Messiah. said:
    Pretty weak GPU due to it's god-awful "64-bit" Memory bus width ! Not to mention the 4 PCIe Gen 4 lanes as well (I know this might not matter much for gaming), and only 16MB on-die SRAM for Navi 24.

    But basically, Navi 24 was meant to be used as a Laptop/Mobile discrete chip. For desktop use as a gaming GPU it's even worse. It's doesn't matter if this card sports 8GB VRAM as well.

    Expect poor/sub-par performance at least in some bandwidth-starved games, if not all.

    But anyway, history repeats again. Because this isn't the first 6500 XT GPU with 8GB VRAM. Nope.

    SAPPHIRE PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT. Released July 2022.

    https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt-8g-gddr6
    1551553081153921024View: https://x.com/SapphireTech/status/1551553081153921024

    Chinese brand PELADN also released their own variant last year in July, dubbed RX 6500 XT ARMOR.

    https://www.ithome.com/0/709/340.htm
    https://media.overclock3d.net/2023/09/chinese-manufacturer-peladn-gives-amds-radeon-rx-6500-xt-an-8gb-memory-upgrade_64fef103ae788.jpeg
    https://img.ithome.com/newsuploadfiles/2023/7/a307bfb4-5a54-4c01-ad8a-343c09e1f2fc.jpg?x-bce-process=image/quality,q_75/format,f_webp
    @Metal Messiah. - I made an account just to say you're awesome, I always read your responses. You should really be employed by Tom's if you aren't already. I've seen this in other businesses to be quite rewarding to have someone double-check the content before it goes out :)
    Reply
  • usertests
    beyondlogic said:
    im aware its navi 24 im suggesting it could be a very crippled navi 23 mobile rx 6000m either that or it is a typo .

    a580 did drop price so i wonder if this amds knee jerk reaction to that.
    I don't think AMD made the decision for ASRock to launch a 6500 XT 8GB. They did that on their own and the configuration is nothing new.

    If there were a card being harvested from 6600M, they should just call it that, because "6500 XT" is poison since people have been loudly informed of the downsides of Navi 24. I found an Ali Express listing for a 6600M-based desktop GPU. I thought there was a 6600M eGPU but I was thinking of the GPD G1 with 7600M XT.
    Reply