RTX 5090 is allegedly 39% faster than RTX 4090 in 3DMark benchmarks — beats RX 7900 XTX by 93%
The RTX 5090 offers significant performance gains over the RTX 4090 in synthetic benchmarks.

The RTX 5090 embargo will be lifted in a couple of days, but Nvidia’s Blackwell flagship GPU benchmark results have already begun to leak. We’ve previously seen Geekbench results for the graphics card, which showed a 27% uplift in performance over the RTX 4090, while Blender tests show the RTX 5090 getting a 36% higher score. Today, VideoCardz shared multiple test results from 3Dmark, reportedly showing the new GPU handily beating the previous top-of-the-line card by up to 53%.
These tests include Speed Way, Steel Nomad, Port Royal, Time Spy, and Fire Strike, with several conducted in 1080p, 1440p, and 2160p/4K resolutions. The publication also said these numbers reportedly came from multiple sources, meaning they are likely verified and reliable. Nonetheless, we recommend taking the results with a grain of salt.
The RTX 5090 offered the most improvement in Steel Nomad (4K), scoring 14,133 points—some 53% higher than the RTX 4090’s 9,216. The previous-generation card did close the gap in other tests, like Time Spy Extreme (2160p), where the RTX 5090’s advantage dropped to 31% but still gained an average advantage of 39% over the RTX 4090.
Test | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 4090 | % Uplift | GeForce RTX 4080 Super | % Uplift | Radeon RX 7900 XTX | % Uplift |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed Way (1440p) | 14,383 | 10,065 | 43% | 7,442 | 93% | 6,349 | 127% |
Steel Nomad (4K) | 14,133 | 9,216 | 53% | 6,834 | 107% | 6,595 | 114% |
Port Royal (1440p) | 36,673 | 26,103 | 40% | 18,288 | 101% | 16,527 | 122% |
Time Spy (1440p) | 48,732 | 36,328 | 34% | 30,482 | 60% | 28,305 | 72% |
Time Spy Extreme (2160p) | 25,485 | 19,466 | 31% | 15,288 | 67% | 14,058 | 81% |
Fire Strike (1080p) | 10,1767 | 72,887 | 40% | 72,275 | 41% | 63,660 | 60% |
Fire Strike (1440p) | 60,778 | 45257 | 34% | 39,919 | 52% | 34,009 | 79% |
Fire Strike Ultra (2160p) | 33,114 | 24,828 | 33% | 20,603 | 61% | 17,484 | 89% |
Average | - | - | 39% | - | 73% | - | 93% |
Launch Price | $1,999 | $1,599 | 25% | $999 | 100% | $999 | 100% |
However, when we compare the RTX 5090 to AMD’s RX 7900 XTX, the card destroys it in 3DMark benchmarks. The Nvidia GPU scored 127% more points in Speed Way (1440p) and 122% higher in Port Royal (1440p). Even if we average all other results, it still shows a massive 93% advantage, showing the separation between the RTX 5090 and RX 7900 XTX in terms of synthetic performance.
However, note that these scores are based on synthetic tests; real-world gaming numbers will vary depending on the rest of your system, the game title, in-game settings, and several other factors. In addition, the RTX 5090 typically performed better in benchmarks than games, with sources claiming that its advantage falls to 20% when used in actual gameplay.
While a 20% uplift in in-game performance might sound decent, you should also remember that you’re paying 25% more for the RTX 5090. Its launch price of $1,999 puts it on par with the RTX 3090 Ti, which was released at the height of the global chip shortage.
Whatever the case, you should wait for official reviews before making a purchase decision. That way, you can check the results of multiple reviewers to help you ensure you’re getting your money’s worth with this GPU purchase.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
Gaidax Well, that's a given with 30% more shaders and 80% more memory bandwidth.Reply
For enthusiasts, 5090 makes sense. The only card in the whole lineup that is a trap is probably 5080.
Of course, this also means that gen-to-gen changes are quite minor besides stuffing more shaders and G7 memory. -
bit_user
Almost 33% more shaders, but those would seem to be the bottleneck, though. However, given the reduction in clock speeds, it's a little hard to see where it gets the extra performance, if DLSS isn't involved.Gaidax said:Well, that's a given with 30% more shaders and 80% more memory bandwidth. -
spongiemaster
If the 5090 is 30% faster than the 4090 on average across the board, then the 5090 will be about twice as fast as a7900XTX using ray tracing at 4k without any rendering aids. In straight rasterized scenarios, we're looking at roughly 60% faster at 4k.drivinfast247 said:If it's LEGIT 93% percent faster than a 7900xtx in games, I'll upgrade. -
aberkae
Creat fud that price is $2499 or higher, create fud of scarcity to cause mass hysteria. Nvidia tactics 101!ilukey77 said:It better be 39% without DLSS for the price they are charging
Bait and switch.
What if Nvidia's goal is to make fe edition slightly better than last gen only to make the aib cards that will probably be more expensive more attractive and performant in comparison 🤔?
Paper launch fe edition and flood the market ( in context to paper launch) with aib cards that are more expensive but potentially clock higher. -
ilukey77
At this point anything is possible with Nvidia !!aberkae said:Creat fud that price is $2499 or higher, create fud of scarcity to cause mass hysteria. Nvidia tactics 101!
Bait and switch.
What if Nvidia's goal is to make fe edition slightly better than last gen only to make the aib cards that will probably be more expensive more attractive and performant in comparison 🤔?
Paper launch fe edition and flood the market ( in context to paper launch) with aib cards that are more expensive but potentially clock higher.
Not like their new to pulling shady BS !! -
dipique
Plus more and MUCH faster tensor cores. If you're on the AI train it's a hell of a card. If not, second hand 4090s will be the way to go.Gaidax said:Well, that's a given with 30% more shaders and 80% more memory bandwidth.
For enthusiasts, 5090 makes sense. The only card in the whole lineup that is a trap is probably 5080.
Of course, this also means that gen-to-gen changes are quite minor besides stuffing more shaders and G7 memory.