Crucial P310 (2280) SSD Review: Same great taste, but with a new look

The P310 is back in a longer form factor.

Crucial P310 (2280) SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Crucial P310 keeps the good all-around performance and power efficiency of its shorter 2230 sibling, making it a good budget drive for laptops especially.

Pros

  • +

    Good all-around performance

  • +

    Power-efficient

Cons

  • -

    Poor sustained performance (QLC)

  • -

    High MSRP and street pricing

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Crucial P310 2280 takes everything we liked about the original Crucial P310 (2230), then stretches it to fit the M.2 2280 form factor. The original 2230’s combination of surprisingly good performance and excellent power efficiency can now be had in a longer package for your desktops and laptops. But there's tons of competition in the 2280 market, so how does the new variant stack up? Budget SSDs continue to surprise us, and the P310 looks to be no different — but there are a lot of rivals in this space.

Yes, you could buy the 2230 version and it will fit most longer M.2 slots — possibly with an adapter for certain laptops. This might even make sense for M.2 2242 hosts, but in general you pay a premium for 2230 drives. This makes a 2280 version of the P310 a pretty good idea, especially from Crucial’s viewpoint. It uses the same hardware, so the drive can remain single-sided and cool-running with essentially no changes. That’s good, as the P310 had good performance for a QLC-based drive, with very high power efficiency. It also means that maybe the drive should be more affordable.

If you’re looking for a budget drive that doesn’t feel like a budget drive, you could do worse than the P310 2280. Its everyday performance feels similar to that of a high-end drive. It does have the dreaded QLC flash that some dislike, but in real world terms and especially with how Crucial has designed this drive, it's often not a big deal. On the other hand, a drive built on QLC flash should be less expensive than its TLC-based peers even if the drives feel similar 99% of the time. The P310’s primary drawback is that with the added competition found in the M.2 2280 form factor, Crucial has to take pricing more seriously.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Crucial P310 Specifications

Product

500GB

1TB

2TB

Pricing

$44.99 ($64.99)

$84.99 ($94.99)

$129.99 ($149.99)

Form Factor

M.2 2280 SS

M.2 2280 SS

M.2 2280 SS

Interface / Protocol

PCIe 4.0 x4 / NVMe 2.0

PCIe 4.0 x4 / NVMe 2.0

PCIe 4.0 x4 / NVMe 2.0

Controller

Phison E27T

Phison E27T

Phison E27T

DRAM

N/A (HMB)

N/A (HMB)

N/A (HMB)

Flash Memory

232-Layer Micron QLC

232-Layer Micron QLC

232-Layer Micron QLC

Sequential Read

6,600 MB/s

7,100 MB/s

7,100 MB/s

Sequential Write

3,500 MB/s

6,000 MB/s

6,000 MB/s

Random Read

N/A

1,000K IOPS

1,000K IOPS

Random Write

N/A

1,200K IOPS

1,200K IOPS

Security

TCG Pyrite

TCG Pyrite

TCG Pyrite

Endurance (TBW)

110TB

220TB

440TB

Part Number

CT500P310SSD8

CT1000P310SSD8

CT2000P310SSD8

Warranty

5-Year

5-Year

5-Year

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Shane Downing
Freelance Reviewer

Shane Downing is a Freelance Reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering consumer storage hardware.

With contributions from
  • Notton
    220TB endurance for that price? no thanks.
    Reply
  • Gauche Cockney
    Overpriced QLC, which is similar to the new gen e-waste NV3
    Reply
  • Shiznizzle
    Notton said:
    220TB endurance for that price? no thanks.
    I swap games so often that 220 will be done in a little over a year. 1.5 years tops. TBW number is the only one i look at apart from price. If both TBW aand price are good i buy it.

    Filling up the drive is also not advised so i tend to try to keep my drives at %50 full. I also turned off all log writing when i was on windows. Dont know how to do that in linux yet so the thing is prolly being written to all day long.

    Just bought a 2 TB Samsung EVO plus.....for 105 pounds. 1200 TBW rating Some WD have 2400
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    And for a lot of people, 220TBW is a decade of use.
    Reply