The State Of Solid State: Computex 2015

Conclusion

A lot of details were filled in at Computex, but the big picture hasn't changed. If you look at any large volume SSD manufacturer right now, you see a three-drive portfolio that includes entry-level, mainstream and premium products. The same offerings will exist moving forward, but many vendors will add two new categories. The classification previously known as mainstream will split into entry-level mainstream and performance-level mainstream. And very low-cost entry-level products will bring the 256GB capacity size down to $50.

Drives like Samsung's 850 Pro and SanDisk's Extreme Pro will come down a tier to create the performance-mainstream category. They'll be joined by entry-level PCIe SSDs similar to Plextor's M6e. More products will quickly fall into this category as SandForce, Phison, Silicon Motion and JMicron release four-channel PCIe controllers. We may even see existing SATA controllers rehashed into new SKUs as the next generation of NAND makes its way onto the market.

The new premium category will be all-PCIe. Samsung's SM951 and Intel's SSD 750 kicked this tier off with a big bang, though we have to recognize the XP941 as the real originator. This is arguably the most exciting place in storage, and the next two years should prove to be the most interesting yet. PCI Express opens the door to a room with an unlimited ceiling. We have four-lane PCIe 3.0 designs now, but that doesn't mean controller manufacturers can't add lanes to increase bandwidth. Before we go that direction, expect to see eight-channel controllers supporting the NVMe protocol and delivering up to 3200 MB/s of sequential read performance. This space will heat up rapidly around Flash Memory Summit, and then turn into a full-blown inferno come CES in January.

Along with lower prices and higher performance, we will also see greater capacities. We didn't bring this up before, but IMFT's 3D NAND will be 256Gb. This doubles the density of the die, which allows 1TB SSDs to become 2TB drives for nearly the same price. One source told us that IMFT 3D flash will be expensive to manufacture, but the flash will appear in client products first. Then, when yields improve, it'll go to the enterprise space. 

TLC flash will also usher in higher-capacity SSDs right along with helping reduce the prices of mainstream products. In the coming days, we'll publish a review of the first retail TLC product that doesn't come from Samsung or SanDisk. Others will follow soon after. We expect to see a large number of TLC flash product SKUs before 2016. After next year's CES, most client SSDs will use TLC with only premium products shipping with MLC flash.

Chris Ramseyer
Chris Ramseyer is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews consumer storage.
  • blackmagnum
    The time is ripe to change your old spinning catastrophe and embrace the now of SSD.
    Reply
  • Vivecss
    So have they fixed the data loss if not connected to electricity for more than a week thing?
    Reply
  • synphul
    Spinning catastrophe? My hdd doesn't perform much slower than my ssd for 90% of tasks, the biggest improvement was installing windows. For that I was impressed. An hdd shouldn't be a catastrophe, if it is I'd strongly suggest a better brand/model. Installed an ssd on a workstation and of all the upgrades it was the component I was least happy with. The new cpu and ram upgrade were by far more impressive. Not that I'm 'unhappy' with it, it is a little snappier though not enough to make me rush right out to buy another one for my other rig. If another 240gb ssd goes on sale for $60 like the first one I bought I might consider it. Pcie m.2 look appealing and great on paper but I suppose it would be of greater benefit to someone who is suffering a bottlenecked system due to storage in the first place.
    Reply
  • CaedenV
    So have they fixed the data loss if not connected to electricity for more than a week thing?
    Yes, about 5 years ago.
    SSDs are still no archival media, and they will corrupt after a year or two without power. But if you are the sort of person who travels a lot and unplugs your PC for 2-3 months at a time then it is not a real concern anymore.
    Reply
  • wtfxxxgp
    So have they fixed the data loss if not connected to electricity for more than a week thing?

    I'm so out of touch that I didn't even know that was "a thing"

    O.o
    Reply
  • Vivecss
    So have they fixed the data loss if not connected to electricity for more than a week thing?
    Yes, about 5 years ago.
    SSDs are still no archival media, and they will corrupt after a year or two without power. But if you are the sort of person who travels a lot and unplugs your PC for 2-3 months at a time then it is not a real concern anymore.

    Really? 5 years ago? Because I've gone on vacation for about a month and my Windows wont even start anymore. And that was about a year ago. Heard a rumor that the 3D stacking technology thing managed to eliminate this problem and i was waiting for some more good news about that before buying a new SSD.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    Spinning catastrophe? My hdd doesn't perform much slower than my ssd for 90% of tasks, the biggest improvement was installing windows. For that I was impressed. An hdd shouldn't be a catastrophe, if it is I'd strongly suggest a better brand/model. Installed an ssd on a workstation and of all the upgrades it was the component I was least happy with. The new cpu and ram upgrade were by far more impressive. Not that I'm 'unhappy' with it, it is a little snappier though not enough to make me rush right out to buy another one for my other rig. If another 240gb ssd goes on sale for $60 like the first one I bought I might consider it. Pcie m.2 look appealing and great on paper but I suppose it would be of greater benefit to someone who is suffering a bottlenecked system due to storage in the first place.

    A $60 240GB SSD is the reason why you don't feel a big performance increase over your HDD.
    Reply
  • WyomingKnott
    "Really? 5 years ago? Because I've gone on vacation for about a month and my Windows wont even start anymore. And that was about a year ago."

    But how old was the SSD? The model, not the particular one that you own.
    Reply
  • synphul
    It was on sale. At the time, ocz vector 150's were going for $180. It stays neck and neck with the samsung 840 evo (850's weren't even available yet) and the two trade blows a bit. The vector 150 has slightly slower random reads and the samsung has slightly slower write speeds. It was chosen for a workstation doing content creation with larger files where write speed was preferred. Maybe people feel such a huge difference over their hdd's because they're using junk hdd's? My wd re4 gives me no issues. The only time aside from bootup that ssd's seem to have a huge performance gain is during testing where a longer sustained data transfer is occurring. Something most people won't encounter under normal use of a pc, instead it will more than likely operate in small bursts. So technically, it was a $180 ssd using the newer 19nm toshiba nand. Hardly a junk ssd.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    When you said it I was thinking something along the lines of a V300 with async flash.
    Reply