Corsair MP600 GS SSD Review: Middling, but Capable

A Competent SSD, but a bit Late

Corsair MP600 GS SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The MP600 GS is your standard mid-range PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD, competent but mostly without stand-out performance. It does offer up to 2TB for your files, and it has a more consistent pSLC caching curve, which may have niche appeal. It’s also a little late to the game, which isn’t a problem if the price comes down a bit.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Power efficient

  • +

    Excellent sustained write performance and consistency

  • +

    Good warranty, software support

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Pricing needs adjusting

  • -

    Heatsink option would help set this drive apart

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Corsair MP600 GS is another decent mid-range PCIe 4.0 SSD, although it feels like it’s arriving too late and at too high a cost. It’s nice to have this level of performance in this price range and get it at up to 2TB, but there’s a lot of competition in this challenging market. 

The MP600 GS has no real issue stepping over older PCIe 3.0 SSDs, including those with DRAM, in both performance and efficiency. Between drives in its own class however, the main thing that sets it apart is its unique pSLC setup. There’s also the Corsair name to consider, which may carry some weight, but the actual hardware is nothing new.

Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Amazing you left out the SK Hynix P31 Gold. Despite being PCIe 3.0 it matches this drive in overall performance and is cheaper.

    I wish that starting next year TH would include comprehensive charts like TechPowerUp does in their reviews and not just cherry pick some competitors, i mean you already have the results on record, so why not make a chart?

    Reply
  • Udyr
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Amazing you left out the SK Hynix P31 Gold. Despite being PCIe 3.0 it matches this drive in overall performance and is cheaper.

    I wish that starting next year TH would include comprehensive charts like TechPowerUp does in their reviews and not just cherry pick some competitors, i mean you already have the results on record, so why not make a chart?

    Then how a mediocre product worth a star or two shine all the way through a 3.5 score?
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Udyr said:
    Then how a mediocre product worth a star or two shine all the way through a 3.5 score?

    Because the star rating is subjective if you're not using a points system. It has higher idle power consumption than other drives, but it has good sustained write speed and generally middling performance in the other metrics. Based on the results, I'd say more like 2.5 stars because it is a PCIe 4.0 drive and should be measured by those standards, and it generally performs in the middle of the pack of the selected comparative drives with overall performance basically matching older, cheaper PCIe 3.0 drives.
    Reply
  • Udyr
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Because the star rating is subjective if you're not using a points system. It has higher idle power consumption than other drives, but it has good sustained write speed and generally middling performance in the other metrics. Based on the results, I'd say more like 2.5 stars because it is a PCIe 4.0 drive and should be measured by those standards, and it generally performs in the middle of the pack of the selected comparative drives with overall performance basically matching older, cheaper PCIe 3.0 drives.
    Therefore, mediocre. Nothing makes it special, especially for that price.
    Reply