Corsair Sabre RGB Pro Mouse Review: the High CPU Cost of 8,000 Hz

The Sabre RGB can run at an impressive 8,000 Hz but will tax your processor.

Corsair Sabre RGB Pro
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Corsair joins Razer in the 8,000 Hz mouse club with the Sabre RGB Pro. Solid, speedy specs and improved iCue software make it a good mouse, especially for the price. However, to make use of its key features without sacrificing gaming performance, you probably need to upgrade your CPU.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    + Selectable polling rate up to 8,000 Hz

  • +

    + Spring-loaded buttons/mechanical switch combo feels fast and durable

  • +

    + Corsair iCue software gets a needed overhaul

  • +

    + Reasonable price

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    8,000 Hz polling makes for demanding CPU/USB requirements

  • -

    Not ambidextrous like competing Razer model

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

In an ongoing effort to craft the best gaming mouse, peripheral makers used to battle over the DPI/CPI sensor specs. Then, the focus shifted to achieving the lightest possible weight. Now, the cutting edge seems to be moving to polling rate, the number of times per second your gaming rodent sends data back to your PC. First, we saw Razer’s Viper 8K Hz, which jumped up from the usual 1,000 Hz polling rate. And now Corsair is joining the 8,000 Hz rat race with the Sabre RGB Pro.

Along with its ultra-fast communication abilities, it sports a solid 18,000 DPI custom Pixart sensor, quality Omron-brand mechanical switches and spring-loaded buttons to help assure the input from your fingers and wrist travels through the mouse and back to your PC for the quickest response time possible. It’s a well-crafted mouse for MOBA/FPS eSports gamers, especially those who prefer a palm grip. And at an MSRP of $59.99, it’s more affordable than Razer’s $80 8,000 Hz alternative.

But as with Razer’s mouse, the primary concern here if you’re looking to get the full benefit of the 8K polling ability is that you may need to upgrade your rig. You can dial back the polling rate to 4,000, 2,000, 1,000 Hz or even lower via the company’s recently revamped iCue 4 software. But at top speed, you’re effectively sending 8 times the amount of data to your gaming rig compared to a more traditional rodent.

Corsair says your system should sport a Intel Core i7 9th Gen or AMD Ryzen 7 2nd Gen CPU or higher to use the Sabre RGB Pro at full clip. And they aren’t kidding. In some anecdotal testing using my custom-built Ryzen 5 2600X system, I saw CPU use spike 10-16% or more when just moving my cursor around quickly at the desktop. That lessened to about 6-10% when doing the same thing on a more recent Ryzen 7 3700X machine. If you already have a recent high-end processor, that’s reasonable. But if not, are you ready to upgrade to one of the best CPUs to ride the wave of cutting-edge mouse technology?

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Matt Safford
Managing Editor

After a rough start with the Mattel Aquarius as a child, Matt built his first PC in the late 1990s and ventured into mild PC modding in the early 2000s. He’s spent the last 15 years covering emerging technology for Smithsonian, Popular Science, and Consumer Reports, while testing components and PCs for Computer Shopper, PCMag and Digital Trends.

  • mac_angel
    Heaven forbid you ever have to deal with Corsair for warranty though. I don't know if they are outsourcing their tech support or what, but they refused to honour the warranty of my quad channel RAM kit with the argument "dual channel is the same"
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    Finally iCue gets a much needed overhaul. It's ridiculously frustrating in its' current form.
    Reply
  • thepersonwithaface45
    g-unit1111 said:
    Finally iCue gets a much needed overhaul. It's ridiculously frustrating in its' current form.
    Oh? They updated it?? That could be an article in itself, just looked at the bottom portion of the article and it do be lookin pretty nice. Always had trouble confirming if my changes were saved or not.
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    thepersonwithaface45 said:
    Oh? They updated it?? That could be an article in itself, just looked at the bottom portion of the article and it do be lookin pretty nice. Always had trouble confirming if my changes were saved or not.

    Hopefully the new version is slightly less of a PITA. But it is annoying attempting to use forward / back functions on any Corsair mouse. I bought a Logitech G903 and it's worlds better than my Vengeance M65.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Would pluging this mouse into a dedicated USB Controller Card lessen the CPU load?
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    g-unit1111 said:
    Hopefully the new version is slightly less of a PITA. But it is annoying attempting to use forward / back functions on any Corsair mouse. I bought a Logitech G903 and it's worlds better than my Vengeance M65.

    I don't have any issues with forward and back with my corsair mouse.
    Reply
  • escksu
    Mouse 8000hz but monitor is 144hz (some models 200hz or more)... but not all game could hit 144 or 200fps...some can but not all.

    So regardless of how many times your mouse poll, its still limited by your fps and monitor refresh rate. its not to say that its useless, but diminishing returns.
    Reply
  • cryoburner
    An 8,000 Hz polling rate seems a bit excessive. Even at 1,000 Hz, your system will be reading the mouse's position roughly four times for every frame on a 240Hz display. I suppose that could mean up to 24% jitter from one frame to the next on such a high-refresh screen though, depending on whether the most recent update was immediately before the frame was rendered, or a quarter frame prior, which might make movement a little less smooth than it could be. At 2,000 Hz the maximum jitter would drop to 12%, or 6% at 4,000 Hz, and 3% at 8,000 Hz. We are only talking fractions of a millisecond though, on a frame that takes multiple milliseconds to be displayed, so I'm not convinced there would be a noticeable difference between something like 4,000 and 8,000 Hz. And that's assuming the OS is even polling the mouse at a perfect 8,000 Hz rate, which it might not be if other other things are interrupting it.

    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    Would pluging this mouse into a dedicated USB Controller Card lessen the CPU load?
    The drivers still needs to read all the data about the mouse's position, button-presses and so on each time it is polled, then possibly process that data in some way before reporting it to the OS, which will in turn store the data in other locations in memory. There are probably a lot of inefficiencies along the way, especially since the standard USB polling rate is just 125 Hz, whereas this is 64 times that. If the OS and drivers were being smart about it, this might all be getting done on a dedicated core on processors with enough cores to spare, though that's probably not happening.
    Reply
  • escksu
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    Would pluging this mouse into a dedicated USB Controller Card lessen the CPU load?

    Nope. Because USB cards are simply just phy controllers on a card. No different from those soldered on your board.

    I understand where you are coming from. A dedicated processor to offload task from the cpu (similar to server NIC and raid controllers). However, it may not be desirable as it will introduce additional latencies.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    escksu said:
    Nope. Because USB cards are simply just phy controllers on a card. No different from those soldered on your board.

    I understand where you are coming from. A dedicated processor to offload task from the cpu (similar to server NIC and raid controllers). However, it may not be desirable as it will introduce additional latencies.
    I was just hoping for a dedicated USB Processor per USB port, that would allow each port to be a Root Port/Hub.

    https://wiki.fractalaudio.com/wiki/index.php?title=CPU_usage
    This way, no matter the polling rate, no matter how much data you send through the USB port, the impact on your CPU usage would be little to negligible.
    Reply