Q&A: Tom's Hardware And Kingston On SSD Technology

Why Kingston?

TH: Intel occasionally tells me that it consistently ranks at the top of the SSD field because it has the best controller and firmware. Since some of your drives are rebranded Intel models, can you explain what makes Intel’s algorithms better?

LK: The controller is the engine, whatever flash device you have. If anyone would understand I/O, it would seem to be Intel. I think it leveraged that expertise and in-depth understanding of its own NAND. I mean, not all NAND is the same. We do a lot of multi-sourcing with our USB products, and as we change from one NAND manufacturer to another, we see differences in performance. I think the Intel drive has an optimized controller designed to work specifically with its NAND.

TH: Not to be rude, but if you guys are basically putting your own sticker on Intel’s drive, what value can Kingston to bring to the product?

LK: Well, that's more of a business question. Think of how Intel traditionally gets into Company X. They come in a Dell or HP box, right? Maybe in a ThinkPad. They wanted our help to proliferate their drives, and we have a channel at the consumer, system builder, and corporate end-user levels. We have people that end up talking to the same Company X. I accompany a lot of those guys on these conversations whenever we have a new technology. But for us, Intel’s drives helped us launch with a very strong product into the SSD market. The win for Intel was that we were covering area they couldn't get to normally.

TH: And I like your mobile and desktop SSD upgrade kits. Very clean and easy. Whoever thought of putting that combo together, good job.

LK: [laughs] Actually, that was me. Not a lot of our competitors have something like that, and if they do, it's often not as well put together as ours. I remember our first conversations with an SSD partner—not Intel—and we actually asked if they had any plans to do this. They looked at me like I had two heads. Like, why would I do that? I asked, “What about customers that have bought an HP whatever and have no install CDs? It's on the drive’s recovery partition.”  They just shrugged their shoulders and said that was the customer’s problem. Needless to say, they’re not a partner of ours, but things like that just convinced us that if we were going to do this, we'd have to do it on our own. The upgrade idea just makes sense for us. Corporate IT has their own standards and methods of cloning. We needed to make it easy for consumers.

           

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
37 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • nonxcarbonx
    Kingston's mitigation software is the best I've seen. On another note, is there a link to the destruction video?
  • pink315
    "Now, with a hard drive, the arm has to move. Now, with a hard drive, the arm has to move."

    I'm not sure if you were trying to be dramatic, or if you just accidentally wrote the same thought twice. Just pointing it out.
  • ta152h
    One way to preserve some of the life of any hard drive is to shut off virtual memory. Most computers don't need it, and if you do, than you're probably better off getting more memory anyway.

    The ideal thing for booting up fast would be to go back to using core memory :-P. RAM that doesn't lose power when you turn it off is pretty cool. Low power, low heat, and would impress people when you say "Oh, that? It's my core memory array.". You'd get dates for sure. Can't say what they'd look like, or if they'd be sane. Or even female :( .

    Still, I'd buy it. Cache handles most reads anyway, and I'm too old fashioned to feel something is a computer without some form of magnetic storage in it.
  • outlw6669
    Fun read but nothing really new...

    I like how good they are at dodging the tough questions.
    What value is there in Kingstons Intel based SSD's vs Intel original?
    Well, they helped Kingston launch a very strong product :P
  • neiroatopelcc
    Maybe it's just me, but I don't feel they properly answered the question of why there's a wear difference bewtween sequential and random ...
  • mitch074
    I solved my netbook's boot times...

    It runs Linux, with a compressed kernel image.

    Looks like real mode disk access, registry hives, antivirus and such do slow Windows boot times.
  • vvhocare5
    I guess Im not a fan of these types of interviews. The interviewee is really just trying to get advertising for their product and they only say good things and gloss over the negatives. They also have some good one liners they toss out, but thats about it.

    I would prefer to see the product benchmarked and compared on price..and then let us decide how we are going to spend our money.
  • JohnnyLucky
    It's interesting but what about the price? Still too high.
  • anamaniac
    Interesting interview.
    Keep them coming. =)

    Now I have the urge to go buy a 256GB SLC drive and play flaming baseball with it... I probably shouldn't...
  • El_Capitan
    I like how they say, "The worst kind of writes that you can apply to an SSD are random. You will wear a drive out quicker that way". However, Kingston and Intel put all their advertising efforts into promoting the speed of their IOPS for their SSD's for server environments. That means they want you to buy their product to use it so it wears out quicker... which means you need to buy another one to replace it. Now that's a wicket smart business strategy.
  • El_Capitan
    I like how they say, "The worst kind of writes that you can apply to an SSD are random. You will wear a drive out quicker that way". However, Kingston and Intel put all their advertising efforts into promoting the speed of their IOPS for their SSD's for server environments. That means they want you to buy their product to use it so it wears out quicker... which means you need to buy another one to replace it. Now that's a wicket smart business strategy.
  • GullLars
    A couple of comments on the interview:
    1. Apploading is NOT sequential, it has a high ammount of random reads. This is why SSDs are so much faster than harddrives at it. You can see this in PCmark vantage, where harddrives get 4-10MB/s in apploading, and SSDs go from 80-160MB/s.

    2. Booting from an SSD over USB 3.0 is wastefull. Most SSDs support NCQ, and get 3-8x higher random read IOPS when NCQ is active, and this is noticable in everyday use. USB 3.0 does NOT support NCQ.

    3. You say Windows 7 requires minimum 16GB to install, wich is true. The PARTITION must be minimum 16GB for the installer to allow it to be selected, however you can reduce the size needed for windows a lot. My windows folder is 13,5GB, and even with 20+ apps installed (MS and Open office suites included) i still use less than 20GB on my C: partition.
    The need for a pagefile is reverse proportional to your ammount of RAM, if you have 4GB or more RAM you can safely deactivate it for normal general computer usage and save a lot of space.
  • williamvw
    nonxcarbonxKingston's mitigation software is the best I've seen. On another note, is there a link to the destruction video?

    I think you mean "migration" software. Although mitigation software could be really useful for resolving hardware errors. ;-)

    The Kingston videos are fun. Start here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udJ8TzvJne8
  • ArgleBargle
    Until flash memory as a whole becomes more reliable, I refuse to use an SSD. Having had a number of USB flash drives from various companies including Kingston fail (one from Sandisk became outright unuseable) even though I am careful with them and always use the "safely remove hardware" command. Flash memory has a very long way to go before I will trust anything important to it.
  • Anonymous
    You should of asked them why the aren't supporting TRIM on last years V+ models with a firmware update. It uses a Samsung controller that was supposed to eventually support TRIM. I bought it with that in mind, and now they have said in email conversations with their support team that they will not be supporting it. Basically anyone who bought an SSD without TRIM is doomed to have worse performance a traditional platter drive eventually. I feel like I was robbed 180 bucks.
  • nevertell
    mitch074I solved my netbook's boot times...It runs Linux, with a compressed kernel image.Looks like real mode disk access, registry hives, antivirus and such do slow Windows boot times.


    This dude IS wright. And that old nt filesystem isn't helping either.

    If you optimize X startup, use a different kernel start-up event manager, you can get below 10 seconds startup time with a netbook.
  • El_Capitan
    Woohoo, Kingston is awesome! I get a Thumbs up for this comment and Thumbs down for my other comments that aren't Kingston positive! Woot!
  • Anonymous
    rectum and ball juice with a baseball bat!!
  • milktea
    I like the idea that even if SSD goes bad, I can still recover my data possibly avoid paying thousands of dollars for the recovery. That is one thing that pulls me away from hard-disk into SSD.
  • darkguset
    neiroatopelccMaybe it's just me, but I don't feel they properly answered the question of why there's a wear difference bewtween sequential and random ...


    True... it looks like they avoided answering the question and they just talked about the difference in speed (again!).