Test Setup And Benchmarks
Picking the hardware for today’s performance testing was particularly difficult. On one hand, it’s clear that Lucid put a lot of effort into optimizing and qualifying ATI’s Radeon HD 4000-series and Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 200-series hardware. And we know that most of the company’s work went into Windows Vista, only recently shifting toward Windows 7.
With that said, Windows 7 is the de facto now. It’s the OS that lets us run with Catalyst 9.12 and GeForce 195.62 installed at the same time. It’s what makes X-mode possible. It’s in for sure.
Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 200-series is really all Nvidia has right now. And while GTX 260s and 275s are probably the most common models, it’s hard to imagine anyone with less than a GeForce GTX 280 or 285 eyeing a $350 P55-based motherboard. The GeForce GTX 285 is a logical choice, too.
The more difficult choice was ATI’s Radeon HD 5870, supported by Lucid’s 1.4.1 driver as of December 31st, 2009. It becomes clear in the benchmarks that support for the 5000-series cards is still early, and we’re willing to take this into account as we go through our analysis. We’re just glad the company’s software team was as timely as they were—again, it’s hard to imagine anybody buying a $350 motherboard to mix their $150 Radeon HD 4000-series cards with an Nvidia board on the cusp of being eclipsed.
For each set of tests, we’ll run three resolutions with no anti-aliasing or anisotropic filtering and then three resolutions with the eye candy turned on. For the no AA/no AF scores, we’ll also include a baseline single Radeon HD 5870 score for evaluating the overall effect of running in CrossFire or A-mode. One thing we're missing here is an example of dissimilar cards from the same vendor. This is something we'll possibly spend more time evaluating as new drivers arrive, shoring up compatibility in our gaming suite.
With the stage set, let’s move on to the numbers.
|Processors||Intel Core i7-870 (Lynnfield) 2.93 GHz, LGA 1156, 8MB L3, Power-savings enabled|
|Motherboards||MSI Big Bang Fuzion (LGA 1156) P55/LucidLogix Hydra engine|
|Row 2 - Cell 0||Asus Maximus III Formula (LGA 1156) P55, BIOS 1202|
|Memory||Corsair 4GB (2 x 2 GB) DDR3-1600 7-7-7-20 @ DDR3-1333|
|Hard Drive||Intel SSDSA2M160G2GC 160 GB SATA 3 Gb/s|
|Graphics||2 x BFG GeForce GTX 285 1GB|
|Row 6 - Cell 0||2 x ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB|
|Power Supply||Cooler Master UCP 1100W|
|System Software And Drivers|
|Operating System||Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit|
|Platform Driver||Intel INF Chipset Update Utility 188.8.131.525|
|Graphics Driver||Catalyst 9.12|
|Row 13 - Cell 0||GeForce 195.62|
|Benchmarks and Settings|
|Crysis||High Quality Settings, No AA / No AF, 4xAA / No AF, vsync off, 1280x1024 / 1680x1050 / 1900x1200, DirectX 10, Patch 1.2.1, 64-bit executable|
|Left 4 Dead 2||High Quality Settings, No AA / No AF, 8xAA / 16xAF, vsync off, 1680x1050 / 1920x1200 / 2560x1600, Tomshardware Demo, Steam Version|
|Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2||Ultra High Settings, No AA / No AF, 4xAA / No AF, 1680x1050 / 1920x1200 / 2560x1600, The Gulag, 60 second sequence, Fraps|
|DiRT2||Ultra High Settings, No AA / No AF, 8xAA / No AF, 1680x1050 / 1920x1200 / 2560x1600, In-Game Benchmark, Steam Version|
|S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call Of Pripyat||High Quality Setting, No AA / No AF, 4xAA / no AF, vsync off, 1680x1050, 1920x1200, 2560x1600, DirectX 10 lighting|
|Batman: Arkham Asylum||High Quality Settings, No AA / No AF, PhysX On/Off, vsync off, 1680x1050, 1920x1200, 2560x1600, Patch 1.1|
|3DMark Vantage||Version: 1.02, Overall, GPU, and CPU scores|
A long way to go though.
It's explained in the analysis ;-)
Quoted from the last page; I disagree with that statement.
There are plenty of people in situations where using this board is a better investment performance per dollars. This is all the more relevant as this technology will undoubtedly find its way into cheaper boards and budget oriented setups where it will make all the sense in the world to bench it using mid-end value parts.
I, for one, would have liked to see what using gtx260s and 5770s would look like in this same setup. As is, this review leaves many questions unanswered.
Or at least that is the conclusion i'm comfortable with at the moment.
i also understand why you paired the 5870 with nvidia's greatest. there is a catch however... lucid guys did not have the chance to play with 5xxx series too much and you may be evaluating something that is not too ripe. i guess the 4xxx series would have been a better chance to see how well the technology works. couple that with games that are not yet certified for lucid, couple that with how much complexity this technology has to overcome... i think this is a magnificent accomplishment o lucid team part.
i also think that in order for this technology to become viable it will go down in price and will be found in much cheaper boards. for the moment the "experimenting phase" is done on the expensive spectrum. i saw some early comparisons and the scaling was beautiful. i know that the system put together by lucid... but that is fine since that was only a demo to show that it works. judging on how fast this guys are evolving i guess that they will go mainstream this year.