Nvidia GeForce GTX 260/280 Review

Features
By Fedy Abi-Chahla, Florian Charpentier
published

World in Conflict

gtx 260 280

gtx 260 280

This is another power-hungry game, but nevertheless it was playable at 2560*1600 without filters. But World in Conflict saw a dark horse take the top score at 1920*1200: the Radeon HD 3870 X2! Once the filters were enabled, the AMD bi-GPU card, which is perfectly suited to this game, provided the best playing conditions, though the GTX 280 was close behind. On a 30" display, it kept its lead, and the GTX 280’s memory only made the difference at an unplayable setting, once again. And that’s not all, since at that same resolution, Nvidia took over the lead – but with the 9800 GX2 and not the GT200. So if all you play are World in Conflict and Crysis, the GTX 280 isn’t really what you need…

Fedy Abi-Chahla
149 Comments Comment from the forums
  • BadMannerKorea
    FIRST OMFG NVIDIA pwns!
    Reply
  • Lunarion
    what a POS, the 9800gx2 is $150+ cheaper and performs just about the same. Let's hope the new ATI cards coming actually make a difference
    Reply
  • foxhound009
    woow,.... that's the new "high end" gpu????
    lolz.. 3870 x2 wil get cheaper... and nvidia gtx200 lies on the shelves providing space for dust........
    (I really expectede mmore from this one... :/ )
    Reply
  • thatguy2001
    Pretty disappointing. And here I was thinking that the gtx 280 was supposed to put the 9800gx2 to shame. Not too good.
    Reply
  • cappster
    Both cards are priced out of my price range. Mainstream decently priced cards sell better than the extreme high priced cards. I think Nvidia is going to lose this round of "next gen" cards and price to performance ratio to ATI. I am a fan of whichever company will provide a nice performing card at a decent price (sub 300 dollars).
    Reply
  • njalterio
    Very disappointing, and I had to laugh when they compared the prices for the GTX 260 and the GTX 280, $450 and $600, calling the GTX 260 "nearly half the price" of the GTX 280. Way to fail at math. lol.
    Reply
  • NarwhaleAu
    It is going to get owned by the 4870x2. In some cases the 3870x2 was quicker - not many, but we are talking 640 shaders total vs. 1600 total for the 4870x2.
    Reply
  • MooseMuffin
    Loud, power hungry, expensive and not a huge performance improvement. Nice job nvidia.
    Reply
  • compy386
    This should be great news for AMD. The 4870 is rumored to come in at 40% above the 9800GTX so that would put it at about the 260GTX range. At $300 it would be a much better value. Plus AMD was expecting to price it in the $200s so even if it hits low, AMD can lower the price and make some money.
    Reply
  • vochtige
    i think i'll get a 8800ultra. i'll be safe for the next 5 generations of nvidia! try harder nv crew
    Reply