Philips Evnia 34M2C7600 Review: High Contrast and Wide Gamut Color

34-inch Ultra-Wide WQHD VA gaming monitor with a Mini LED backlight, 165 Hz, DisplayHDR 1400, Adaptive-Sync, and extended color.

By Christian Eberle
published
Philips Envia 34M2C7600
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

Image 1 of 3
Philips Evnia 34M2C7600
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

I modified my test procedure in the 34M2C7600’s case to show its full potential. Out of the box in SmartImage mode, it peaks at just under 500 nits with a respectable 2,727.5:1 contrast. But in Game 1 mode, with the brightness maxed and no other adjustments, the peak is much higher at 740 nits with contrast at nearly 4,000:1. This is a much better state of affairs thanks to the lower black level.

After Calibration to 200 nits

Image 1 of 3
Philips Evnia 34M2C7600
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

I couldn’t calibrate the RGB sliders because there aren’t any. But I changed the gamma to 2.4 and chose the Preset color temp to get a slightly higher contrast. You can see that all the panels have excellent native contrast. It’s a bummer you can’t use the 34M2C7600’s local dimming because it would add a lot of punch to SDR content.

Quality control is excellent, which is indicated by the Philips’ high ANSI contrast value of 3,315.9:1. Despite the lack of an SDR zone dimming option, the monitor looks fantastic with deep blacks, bright whites and plenty of color.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

MORE: How to Choose the Best HDR Monitor

Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors.

6 Comments Comment from the forums
  • cknobman
    I have a hard time considering this when I can get a OLED version cheaper.
    If the display wasnt curved it might make a case for desktop and productivity use but thats not really the market this display is targeting.
    Reply
  • coloradoblah
    when will these ultrawide gaming monitors move on from 1440p? I dont need 4k but why not at least make a switch to 1600p from some 38” monitors, I like my 4 year old 34” 1440p monitor but i can see the pixels.
    Reply
  • coloradoblah
    cknobman said:
    I have a hard time considering this when I can get a OLED version cheaper.
    If the display wasnt curved it might make a case for desktop and productivity use but thats not really the market this display is targeting.
    I use my curve for work, it took a little getting used to but as long as you arent doing graphic design stuff you can make it work
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    $1300? No thanks. There are better options that have better color accuracy, don't have a curved screen or VA panel, and cost under $1000.
    Reply
  • alithegreat
    There should be a comment and comparison to aw3423dwf, which I guess is about 1100$.
    Reply
  • MiniITXEconomy
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    $1300? No thanks. There are better options that have better color accuracy, don't have a curved screen or VA panel, and cost under $1000.

    Ugh, thank you so much, this was the info I was looking for... also, hell no, I ain't paying that much for this.
    Reply