Evaluation Of The New Generation
Some readers have complained about the lack of clear recommendations and awards for the new graphics cards. Since Nvidia and AMD put out their products at different times, no direct match-up has been made until now. This test is a perfect basis for comparison, since all graphics chips have completed the same benchmarks with the same test system. We have evaluated 3D performance, power consumption, price, and noise levels. To keep the evaluation simple, we award from one to four points for each category—the better the card does, the more points it is given.
The power consumption in watts is evaluated separately for the 2D and 3D modes, so there are points for both categories. The performance per watt has not been evaluated, as we are only interested in the overall efficiency of the samples. In 3D mode, the Nvidia cards are insatiable, while in 2D mode, AMD does poorly. Although all of the cards drop their clock speeds, the power consumption of the HD 4850 and HD 4870 remain high. At the moment, the high clock speed of the GDDR5 RAM on AMD’s HD 4870 has a negative influence on 2D power levels.
We have heard rumors that current versions of the PowerPlay energy saving function do not work properly. The clocking rate is reduced, but the voltage remains the same, which might explain the high 2D consumption.
|1. Power consumptionwatts||2D mode||Low Power 3D||3D mode||Points2D||Points3D|
|GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)||117||130||352||3||1|
|GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)||111||125||336||4||2|
|Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)||147||0||288||1||3|
|Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB)||122||0||237||2||4|
Power consumption, entire system, 2D = Desktop Vista, 3D = Full load
When it comes to noise levels, only the Radeon HD 4850 is reasonable. The HD 4870 is very loud, while the GTX 260 and GTX 280 generate extreme acoustic output under full load. The overclocked HD 4870 from MSI does not have a constant fan speed in 2D mode. Rather, the fan gets louder and then quieter again. A new VGA BIOS may solve this problem. The points are a mixed result of 2D and 3D.
|2. noise level dB(A)||2D dB(A)||3D dB(A)||Points|
|GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)||37.7||54.5 - 54.7||2|
|GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)||38.1 - 44.2||53.5 - 54.0||1|
|Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)||35.5||45.5 - 46.0||3|
|Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB)||36.3||41.2||4|
The overall performance is quite clear; the gaps between values are not evaluated.
|3. overall performance||fps||Percent||Points|
|GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)||3765.6||127.0||4|
|GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)||3464.8||116.8||3|
|Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)||3355.7||113.2||2|
|Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB)||2965.6||100.0||1|
This evaluation only shows the level of MSI overclocking in percent. The Radeon HD 4850 is supplied at default clocking, and is thus not included. To ensure that the evaluation is fair, the overclocked value is included in the end result once, and ignored once.
|4. OC power 1920x1200 AA (MSI)||Percent||Points|
|GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)||5.8||3|
|GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)||4.5||2|
|Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)||3.5||1|
Price is also quite clear, with the gaps between the figures not evaluated.
|5. The price||dollars||Points|
|GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)||420||1|
|GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)||290||2|
|Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)||270||3|
|Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB)||180||4|
On points, the Radeon HD 4850 is the clear winner. If you want a little more performance, though, you would be well advised to go for the HD 4870 or GTX 260, both of which represent serious competition for AMd due to price.
|6. Evaluation of points||without OC||with OC|
|GeForce GTX 280 (1024 MB)||11||14|
|GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)||12||14|
|Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB)||12||13|
|Radeon HD 4850 (512 MB)||15||15|
Current page: Evaluation Of The New GenerationPrev Page Swapping Old Chips For New Next Page Conclusions – Radeon HD 4850 Is The Winner
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Looks like the results for SLI and Crossfire were switched with the single card results. . .Reply
Not a bad article, really comprehensive.Reply
My one complaint? Why use that CPU when you know that the test cards are going to max it out? Why not a quad core OC'ed to 4GHz? It'd give far more meaning to the SLI results. We don't want results that we can duplicate at home, we want results that show what these cards can do. Its a GPU card comparason, not a complain about not having a powerful enough CPU story.
Oh? And please get a native english speaker to give it the once over for spelling and grammar errors, although this one had far less then many articles posted lately.
No 4870x2 in CF so its the worlds top end Nvidia vs ATI mid to low end.Reply
It'd be a good article if you'd used a powerful enough CPU and up to date Radeon drivers (considering we're now up to 8.8 now), I mean are those even the 'hotfix' 8.6's or just the vanilla drivers?Reply
Version AMD Catalyst 8.6? Why not just say i'm using ATI drivers with little to no optimizations for the 4800's. This is why the CF benchmarks tanked.Reply
at 1280, all of the highend cards were CPU limited. at that resolution, you need a 3.2-3.4 c2d to feed a 3870... this article had so much potential, and yet... so much work, so much testing, fast for nothing, because most of the results are very cpu limited (except 1920@AA).Reply
WTF, hd4850 SHOULD be a lot faster than 9600 GT and 8800 GT even tough they have 1Gig of ramReply
No 4870X2 and 1920 X 1200 max resolution tested. How about finishing the good start of an article with the rest of it...Reply
I agree, the 4870 X2 should have been in there and should have used the updated drivers. Good article but I think you fell short on finishing it.Reply
@pulasky - Rage much? It's called driver issues you dumbass. Some games are more optimised for multicard setups than others, and even then some favour SLi to Crossfire. And if you actually READ the article rather than let your shrinken libido get the better of you, you'll find that Crossfire does indeed work in CoD4.Reply
Remember, the more you know.