Supermicro C7X99-OCE ATX Motherboard Review

Can Supermicro deliver its legendary server-component reliability with the overclocking features we’ve grown to love? We gauge the company’s progress in its third generation of enthusiast-oriented motherboards.

Early Verdict

A premium-priced board with few basic features, Supermicro’s C7X99-OCE is best suited to Supermicro’s rising fan base.

Pros

  • +

    Dual Intel Gigabit Ethernet and Supermicro’s reputation for stability and longevity.

Cons

  • -

    Few added features, reduced implementation of chipset-integrated data ports, and minor overclocking difficulties.

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Reliable Overclocking?

Famed for its reliability in the server market, Supermicro was once known to enthusiasts only for its cases. The company finally decided to dip a toe into the overclocking market with the C7Z87-OCE motherboard. But it wasn’t until Intel's Z97 update that Tom’s Hardware finally felt the teething pains of a company that was most experienced building business-oriented hardware. Today’s C7X99-OCE brings over two years of overclocking-related firmware advancements to users who want the added cores or PCIe 3.0 lanes of Haswell-E via LGA 2011-v3.

The C7X99-OCE is even rated for four-way SLI, though the dual-slot brackets and coolers of most compatible cards makes it unlikely that enthusiasts will try squeezing a third card into that single space before the fourth slot. You’d also lose front-panel USB 3.0, since the solitary header is located along the bottom edge. Heck, you might even lose the use of that header with a third card, depending on whether your double-space cooler is more than 8.4” long. Before we dig deeper into the connectors, here’s how it compares to the rest of our ~$300 boards:

Swipe to scroll horizontally
X99 Mainstream Motherboard Features
Row 0 - Cell 0 Supermicro C7X99-OCE MSI X99S MPower ASRock X99 Extreme6/ac Asus X99 Pro
PCB Revision 1.01 4.0 1.07 1.01
Chipset Intel X99 Intel X99 Intel X99 Intel X99
Voltage Regulator Eight Phases 12 Phases 12 Phases Eight Phases
100MHz BCLK 99.98 (-0.02%) 99.98 (-0.02%) 99.94 (-0.06%) 99.94 (-0.06%)
I/O Panel Connectors
P/S 2 1 1 1 1
USB 3.0 6 8 6 6
USB 2.0 None 2 2 4
Network 2 1 2 1
eSATA None None 1 None
CLR_CMOS Button None 1 1 1
Digital Audio Out Optical Optical Optical Optical
Digital Audio In None None None None
Analog Audio 5 5 5 5
Other Devices None None 2x Wi-Fi Antenna 2x Wi-Fi Antenna
Internal Interfaces
PCIe 3.0 x16 (Core i7-5960X, -5930K) 4 (x16/x8/x8/x8) SLI x4, CrossFire x4 4 (x16/x16/x0/x8*, x8/x16/x8/x8*) SLI x4, CrossFire x4 *Forces M.2 to PCIe 2.0 x2 3 (x16/x16/x8) SLI x3, CrossFire x3 M.2 disables x8 slot 3 (x16/x16/x8) SLI x3, CrossFire x3 M.2 disables x8 slot
PCIe 3.0 x16 (Core i7-5820K) 4 (x16/x0/x8/x0) SLI x2, CrossFire x2 4 (x16/x8/x0/x4*, x8/x8/x8/x4*) SLI x3, CrossFire x4 *Forces M.2 to PCIe 2.0 x2 3 (x16/x8/x4) SLI x2, CrossFire x3 M.2 disables x4 slot 3 (x16/x8/x4) SLI x2, CrossFire x3 M.2 disables x4 slot
PCIe 2.0 x16 None None None 1 (x4, shares 1x PCIe x1, 1x USB 3.0 controller [2-ports])
PCIe 2.0 x1 2 (x4 slot length) 2 (open-ended) 2 (+1x mini-PCIe, Filled) 2 (1x w/x16, 1x w/Wi-Fi)
USB 3.0 1 (2-ports) 2 (4-ports) 2 (4-ports) 2 (4-ports)
USB 2.0 None 2 (4-ports) 2 (4-ports) 2 (4-ports)
SATA 6.0 Gb/s 10 10 (Shares M.2/SATA-E) 10 (Shares M.2/SATA-E) 10 (2x Shared w/SATA-E)
SATA Express None 1 (Uses 2x SATA) None 1 (Uses 2x SATA)
M.2 Interfaces (Transfer Modes) None 1 (PCIe 3.0 x4, PCIe 2.0 x2, SATA 6Gb/s x2) 1 (PCIe 3.0 x4, SATA 6Gb/s x1) 1 (PCIe 3.0 x4-only)
4-Pin Fan 5 5 2 6 (5x PWM/DC dual-mode)
3-Pin Fan None None 4 None
FP-Audio 1 1 1 1
S/PDIF I/O None None None Output Only
Internal Buttons Power, OC1/2/3/DRAM/Home, CLR CMOS, BIOS Restore Power, Reset, OC-Genie, Clock +/- Power, Reset Power, Reset, Mem_OK
Internal Switch BIOS Recovery Mode Slow Mode, BIOS Selector Dual BIOS Selector XMP, EPU (low-energy), TPU (auto-overclocking)
Diagnostics Panel Numeric Numeric Numeric Numeric
Other Devices Serial COM, OC Front Panel None Serial COM, TB_Header, HDD-Saver, USB Type-A Serial COM, TB_Header, EXT_FAN
Mass Storage Controllers
Chipset SATA 10x SATA 6Gb/s 10x SATA 6Gb/s (Includes M.2, SATA-E) 10x SATA 6Gb/s (Includes M.2, eSATA) 10x SATA 6Gb/s (Includes M.2, SATA-E)
Chipset RAID Modes 0, 1, 5, 10 (Ports 1-6) 0, 1, 5, 10 (Ports 1-6) 0, 1, 5, 10 (Ports 1-6) 0, 1, 5, 10 (Ports 1-6)
Add-In SATA None None None None
USB 3.0 None VL805 PCIe ASM1042 PCIe ASM1042e PCIe ASM1072 Hub ASM1042e PCIe ASM1072 Hub
Networking
Primary LAN Intel i210 PCIe Intel i210 PCIe WGI218V PHY WGI218V PHY
Secondary LAN Intel i210 PCIe None AR8171 PCIe None
Wi-Fi None None BCM4352 PCIe 802.11ac dual-band / BT 4.0 BCM4352 PCIe 802.11ac dual-band / BT 4.0
Bluetooth None None BT 4.0 / Wi-Fi Combo BT 4.0 / Wi-Fi Combo
Audio
HD Audio Codec ALC1150 ALC1150 ALC1150 ALC1150
DDL/DTS Connect None None DTS Connect DTS Connect
Warranty Three Years Three Years Three Years Three Years
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • ykki
    Is it only me or does 3 year warranty on $300 components seem a little low?
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    15434696 said:
    Is it only me or does 3 year warranty on $300 components seem a little low?
    Tons of consumer electronics in North America only have a one-year manufacturer warranty regardless of price range.

    Personally, I think three years should be the minimum legal warranty: reduce the amount of e-waste generated by device manufacturers engineering their products to barely outlive the warranty. Making retailers accountable for part of the warranty repair costs would also give them incentive to avoid stocking dodgy products.

    (Except on batteries which people can ruin within months by abusing the heck out of them, one more reason to make batteries user-replaceable again.)
    Reply
  • wolverine96
    It seems like a good motherboard for most users' needs. Supermicro followed the old saying, Keep It Simple, Stupid!I kind of like the complete absence of USB 2.0. Who really needs USB 2.0, when USB 3.0 is backward-compatible? The only slight problem I can think of is the front USB 2.0 ports on your case will be useless, but there are other case options out there.
    Reply
  • firefoxx04
    Does Win8 / Win10 have native usb 3.0 support? I imagine they do. I know I have a hard time installing windows 7 when my USB key / keyboard / mouse are plugged into a usb 3.0 port.

    I like seeing that USB 3 is becoming prevalent but it worries me a bit for 100% backwards comparability. I guess installing a driver during install is not too trivial but it is annoying.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    15438455 said:
    Does Win8 / Win10 have native usb 3.0 support? I imagine they do. I know I have a hard time installing windows 7 when my USB key / keyboard / mouse are plugged into a usb 3.0 port.

    I like seeing that USB 3 is becoming prevalent but it worries me a bit for 100% backwards comparability. I guess installing a driver during install is not too trivial but it is annoying.
    Blame the motherboard manufacturer, probably, as most of those old systems relied on third-party controllers not supported by native drivers. Remember that USB 3.0 is a 2-in-1 interface, the USB 2.0 connection is still there (chipset-based ports should be supported in USB 2.0 mode prior to updating the drivers).
    Reply
  • bit_user
    15434487 said:
    Can Supermicro deliver its legendary server-component reliability
    I have one of their older Socket 2011 workstation boards.

    I've been happy with it, so far (no overclocking or multi-GPU, though). My only complaint is a significant hissing on the line-out port, forcing me to use a separate sound card. But when I viewed the Newegg reviews a year later, it sounded like they had some serious quality problems starting shortly after I bought mine.

    So, maybe they've already lost that "legendary reliability"? It wasn't a cheap board, either.

    I just bought an ASRock mini-ITX server board, though it was the only option with all the features I wanted. We'll see how that works out...
    Reply
  • Bolts Romano
    why do motherboard maker still provide ps2 connector on the motherboard?
    Is there people still use ps 2 keyboard today?
    Is there people who can afford to buy 300 dollars motherboard and still use 1998 keyboard and mouse?
    Reply
  • DrakeFS
    @Bolts Romano: Its a gaming thing mostly. USB adds latency to the keyboard and mouse.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    15448545 said:
    why do motherboard maker still provide ps2 connector on the motherboard?
    Is there people still use ps 2 keyboard today?
    Is there people who can afford to buy 300 dollars motherboard and still use 1998 keyboard and mouse?
    2 markets. Some people love their old mouse, others love their old mechanical keyboards. That's 2 markets, 1 port, roll the dice and hope the crossover doesn't hurt your marketing :)

    Reply
  • bit_user
    why do motherboard maker still provide ps2 connector on the motherboard?
    Is there people still use ps 2 keyboard today?
    Is there people who can afford to buy 300 dollars motherboard and still use 1998 keyboard and mouse?
    heard of BadUSB? Some people are disabling USB HID on their PCs. Granted, that's pretty uncommon.

    I still use a PS/2 keyboard I paid $300 for, years ago. I do have a USB adapter for it, but I think it increases the number of missed key presses/releases.
    Reply