Firmware 1.5: Iometer Test File Monitoring
After secure erasing the Vertex 4, we created a test file using Iometer that filled the drive with 64 KB sequential blocks and monitored write activity at the physical device using Window’s Performance Monitor.
As the file is created, performance drops when capacity shrinks below 50%. Write speeds, specifically, decelerate from a maximum of maximum of 352.42 MiB/s to a minimum of 64.31 MiB/s.
Next, we place 50% static data on the drive and use Iometer to recreate a test file that fills the remaining 59.5 GB. Once 50% of the still-available capacity is consumed, write speeds drop from a maximum of 356.12 MiB/s to a minimum of 73.31 MiB/s.
Finally, we place 74% static data on the drive and use Iometer to recreate a test file that fills the remaining capacity. Before we can get to 50% of what's left, write speeds quickly drop from a maximum of 363.22 MiB/s. Because this happened so close to when monitoring began, zero writes are recorded before the file transfer starts to peak and drop to around 73.31 MiB/s.
These results mirror our observations using HD Tune.
Current page: Firmware 1.5: Iometer Test File MonitoringPrev Page Firmware 1.5: AS SSD Compression Benchmark Next Page Our Theory About How v.1.4 Changed Write Performance
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Good idea I suppose. Nothing that's going to particularly influence my decision. Probably gonna be sticking with either a Crucial or Corsair SSD. :)Reply
on pages 6 and 7, the author of the article is shown as "Chris angelini"Reply
the rest of the pages show "Richard Hart"
does the rearrangement of data occur only during a reboot cycle?Reply
how much idle time is needed for the data rearrangement to take place?
And what is the authors recommendation on a Vertex4? should a user buy Vertex 4 over a Samsung/Sandforce?
Does this SDD support full disk encryption with any of the Intel desktop mainboards (Ivy Bridge)? AFAIK Intel is not supporting FDE since Q67 and although Q77 is capable of FDE, there is no mobo with BIOS that can support it. Could Tomshardware investigate it?Reply
So keep the disk under half full and it wears out twice as fast?Reply
Does the performance mode mean that the wear leveling is constrained to the first bit of every cell and therefore the drive wears out quicker compared to normal mode?
I went from firmware 1.3 to 1.5, the performance increase is huge, but the down side is that the drive is not 128GB anymore but only 120GB. Has anyone else seen this issue also? Did OCZ reserve more spare?Reply
How many additional firmware updates are needed before OCZ gets it right?Reply
AnonymousI went from firmware 1.3 to 1.5, the performance increase is huge, but the down side is that the drive is not 128GB anymore but only 120GB. Has anyone else seen this issue also? Did OCZ reserve more spare?It is actually occuring with update 1.4. Hmm, damn I need to do another clone disk before doing the update.Reply
Bother! I just purchased one.The more worse is this one has updated to firmware 1.4.Reply
JohnnyLuckyHow many additional firmware updates are needed before OCZ gets it right?Reply
Do you dislike manufacturers improving their products without demanding that you pay more money for the improvements?