Large-scale simulated 10-year OLED monitor torture tests confirm burn-in haunts all models — Testing also reveals edge-lit TVs are insanely failure-prone
RTINGS.com continues its legendary endurance tests for TVs and monitors, and competiting panels are dropping like flies

Over 100 TVs and a small cadre of monitors have been put through the ringer by review heavyweights RTINGS.com, as its legendary longevity burn-in test crosses the two-year mark. Forcing the tested panels to endure nonstop uptime, simulating 10 years of average usage, the test has revealed some key truths about recent trends in consumer screens.
We first covered the test's 10-month mark findings back in 2023, when the burn-in was just beginning and the monitors tested still looked good as new. Now, the above picture paints a clear image of the failure and agony stretching across many panels at the end of their lifespans.
RTINGS claims that the most significant finding from the test so far is that edge-lit TVs are prone to failure sooner than direct-lit panels. While edge-lit TVs are cheaper and thinner than direct-lit screens, and theoretically cool down faster after being turned off, nonstop usage subjects the panel to intense, concentrated heat that can warp and crack panels, causing LED burnouts and failures much sooner. In the long term, edge-lit TVs are a potential liability.
The long-term torture test's methodology is simple: each screen runs a 24/7 live stream of a CNN news feed on maximum panel brightness. This stream was chosen both for its accessibility and nonstop nature, as well as for the consistency of elements like the breaking news ticker and centrally-positioned talking heads, which are more likely to contribute to screen burn-in.
Screen burn-in is a phenomenon occurring on LED panels (especially OLED screens, but potentially any screen run for long and hard enough) where certain constantly-shown elements become seemingly baked into the display. While some burn-in goes away after a panel's refresh cycle, for the screens that have been running the gambit for over two years, the burn-in is permanent.
Monitors Tested and Other Major Findings
Three monitors have been part of the long-term research, joining the 24/7 torture test four months after the TVs began. The LG 27GR95QE-B, Alienware AW3423DWF, and Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 are a trio of OLED, 1440p, high refresh-rate monitors of 165Hz or higher that have all been subjected to testing. In contrast to the TVs, which have exhibited rising failure rates in recent months, all three monitors are still going, though burn-in has become incredibly obvious.




All three panels are now clearly showing signs of burn-in at the bottom row of the screen, where the CNN news ticker typically rests. Samsung's Odyssey OLED monitor has the CNN logo specifically burned into its bottom right corner. The LG panel is especially rough, also exhibiting clear evidence of the outline of a talking head in the center of the screen, and displaying colors with significantly less accuracy than either of the other two monitors. The burn-in becomes much starker when viewed in tandem with a look at the three monitors a few months into the test process.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Surprisingly, where most TV screens tested have seen a measured downward progression in their peak brightness values, the three monitors have held steady around their day 1 values. While both the LG and Samsung monitors experienced some fluctuation around the 3,600-hour mark, all three line graphs for these screens appear to be positively parallel with the x-axis. For a better look at these graphs, be sure to check the RTINGS.com written review.
Other noteworthy failures and observations in the test include a high occurrence of backlight failures, causing entire TVs to die. Where some screens saw large regions of their backlights completely die out, with the remainder staying lit, creating an odd half-on, broken look, many TVs in recent weeks of testing have had a single LED in the backlight die, causing the entire TV to be unable to power on.
For more stories of the test's crazy TV deaths, dying panel gore, and other general trends and observations, RTINGS.com's update YouTube video and written post both hold great value to consumers and panel trend followers.
The RTINGS.com test is not much longer for this world. As the TVs have been chugging for 28 months total and the monitors for 24, RTINGS observes that most of its testing stock is nearing the right edge of its bathtub curve, and the rate of catastrophic failures will continue to rise until the test becomes frivolous to run. When that final day and its final observations come, a great wealth of knowledge on the state of TV manufacturing will surely come to light.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Sunny Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Sunny has a handle on all the latest tech news.
-
Amdlova My galaxy s7 have some burn in on the screen but need years to show something.Reply
On the s23 I use it with all black screen and icons modded to black and white.
The torture test they make even a lcd screen will show some marks. -
atomicWAR
Agreed but OLED gets there far faster. I'd love an OLED for pixel response time but until I can use one 8 to12 hours a day with similar life span to QLED or LCD...its not worth the yearly upgrade (maybe two years) I would need when QLED has got me 5 years with a very slight sign if burn in.Amdlova said:The torture test they make even a lcd screen will show some marks. -
NotaBot90
It's worth the cost difference. Ive had only oled since 2020 and with the pixel refresh set automatic once a month, I haven't noticed any burn in.atomicWAR said:Agreed but OLED gets there far faster. I'd love an OLED for pixel response time but until I can use one 8 to12 hours a day with similar life span to QLED or LCD...its not worth the yearly upgrade (maybe two years) I would need when QLED has got me 5 years with barely a sign if burn in.
It's true, it doesn't appear they'll last as long but something has to be said of the upgrade over even the best qled.
It's not even close as far as eye candy is concerned.
My first was a c9 from 2020 and it still stomps anything that isn't another oled.
Considering I paid $3500 (77") from greentoe and they can be had for around half that now, it is a steal if you aren't on a budget.
I game, work and watch tv pretty much 24 hours a day on all 4 of mine as well. The 77 only turns off when updating or refreshing. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell atomicWAR said:Agreed but OLED gets there far faster. I'd love an OLED for pixel response time but until I can use one 8 to12 hours a day with similar life span to QLED or LCD...its not worth the yearly upgrade (maybe two years) I would need when QLED has got me 5 years with barely a sign if burn in.
I think the only way OLED is going to become that durable is if the displays use "AI" (algorithms) to detect static elements and literally turn the pixels off after a short time unless the mouse cursor moves to them, starting intermittently (every other frame is black) then full off (pixels off), which would be an extremely nice thing to have in TVs as well for status bars and the like. Sadly since that runs contrary to "sell this self destructing product as often as possible!" mentality of manufacturers they're not going to develop or implement it without a mandate, which there won't be. -
atomicWAR
Well said. Even LCD, LED, and QLED/QNED are all built to fail. Planned obsolesce is in overdrive for the TV/monitor market in particular though it is tech wide as a whole (side eyes at crApple and Android phones/tablets). OLED just happens to be the red headed step child of durability while being the golden child of image quality.Alvar Miles Udell said:I think the only way OLED is going to become that durable is if the displays use "AI" (algorithms) to detect static elements and literally turn the pixels off after a short time unless the mouse cursor moves to them, starting intermittently (every other frame is black) then full off (pixels off), which would be an extremely nice thing to have in TVs as well for status bars and the like. Sadly since that runs contrary to "sell this self destructing product as often as possible!" mentality of manufacturers they're not going to develop or implement it without a mandate, which there won't be. -
LabRat 891 OLED displays are somewhat akin to 'ultra performance brake pads', right now. -They're a high performance consumable.Reply
They perform exceptionally well but, at a drastically reduced lifespan.
Even, when 'babied' they'll still wear out faster than a lesser-performant part.
For all the practical issues with lifespan and burn-in, OLED is a head-and-shoulders above the best LCD. Don't buy an OLED unless you know what you're getting into. -
ezst036 Knowing about burn-in I never have and never will buy something OLED based unless it was the only option or some device having a minutely-small OLED screen. Say 1-3 inches and it didn't matter to me anyways.Reply -
Alvar "Miles" Udell atomicWAR said:Well said. Even LCD, LED, and QLED/QNED are all built to fail. Planned obsolesce is in overdrive for the TV/monitor market in particular though it is tech wide as a whole (side eyes at crApple and Android phones/tablets). OLED just happens to be the red headed step child of durability while being the golden child of image quality.
Well not REALLY. LCD based tech has overcome its early issues (CCFL lights, TN screens, burn in issues), but OLED is inherently flawed that can't be overcome. Those flaws are fairly well mitigated with cell phones and TVs, things that are not generally displaying static content and are off fairly frequently, but for computer monitors it's application of a tech to a purpose for which it is not fit. Mini-LED is the solution for computer displays, but I'm afraid with Apple adopting an OLED MacBook Pro that the tech may be pushed to the wayside. -
HIPERATIVO
I got an even better Idea, a transparent panel on top of an OLED one, when the oled panel pixel shows signs of excessive static element, the front panel would turn on pixel to complete the screen display, while the oled back panel turned off that specific pixel, maintaining the screen on, while giving certain parts of the OLED panel to recover so it can go back to being fully OLED displayatomicWAR said:Well said. Even LCD, LED, and QLED/QNED are all built to fail. Planned obsolesce is in overdrive for the TV/monitor market in particular though it is tech wide as a whole (side eyes at crApple and Android phones/tablets). OLED just happens to be the red headed step child of durability while being the golden child of image quality.