At 4,500 hours, MSI's OLED MPG 321URX is showing noticeable visual artifacts — intentional burn-in test shows the limits of monitor tech after 18 months of non-top use

MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED
(Image credit: MSI)

Monitors Unboxed is continuing its lengthy OLED monitor stress testing video series with a burn-in update at the 18-month mark. The YouTube channel's host, Tim Schiesser, published a new video detailing all of the burn-in effects his MSI's MPG 321URX is now displaying after a whopping 4,500 hours of use. Long story short: some of the display's burn-in artifacts are now showing up during day-to-day use.

For those unfamiliar with the video series, Monitors Unboxed began stress testing an MPG 321URX almost two years ago to record the burn-in susceptibility of OLED displays. To do this, Schiesser replaced his LCD display at work with an MSI MPG 321URX OLED gaming monitor and is using it for day-to-day tasks such as writing scripts, video editing, and photo editing.

Deliberately Burning In My QD-OLED Monitor - 18 Month Update - YouTube Deliberately Burning In My QD-OLED Monitor - 18 Month Update - YouTube
Watch On
TOPICS
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • VizzieTheViz
    So this tells us exactly nothing about how long an OLED screen will last without issues when used for work or gaming or a mixed workload.

    Who, except the person doing this test, buys a screen for only showing static windows? What a waste of time and a perfectly good screen.
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    So basically by the time the average user might notice burn-in effects, it's time for a new monitor anyways...
    Reply
  • closs.sebastien
    exactly what I think.. that's why I bought a oled last year. even despite this "hype" of "burning-fear"...
    Reply
  • King_V
    vanadiel007 said:
    So basically by the time the average user might notice burn-in effects, it's time for a new monitor anyways...
    How long do you think between new monitors, and how long do you think until the average user notices burn-in?

    For point of reference, I have had my current IPS monitor for 8 years now, and don't think I'm upgrading anytime soon.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    vanadiel007 said:
    So basically by the time the average user might notice burn-in effects, it's time for a new monitor anyways...
    If I'm spending $600-$800 on a monitor, it'd better last 10+ years, or it's really just expensive e-waste.

    Maybe it will be relegated to secondary monitor duty at some point if/when I get a better one, but (for me) burn-in is not an acceptable trade-off for the OLED benefits. MicroLED production needs to be accelerated.
    Reply
  • JeffreyP55
    Admin said:
    Monitors Unboxed published a new burn-in update of its MSI MPG 321URX after over 4,000 hours of use. The monitor is finally developing visible burn-in that is subtly affecting day-to-day use.

    At 4,500 hours, MSI's OLED MPG 321URX is showing noticeable visual artifacts — intentional burn-in test shows the limits of monitor tech after 18 m... : Read more
    Why? Most folks keep the contrast and brightness at a decent level. Putting the monitor to sleep and x amount of time of use isn't a bad idea. Leaving an OLED monitor on with bright colors, whites or gray scale would cause an early death. And why the H is there a need to know how long it takes for monitor burn-in? Be patient, it will happen slowly with time if you don't take care of the thing.
    Reply
  • Scanphor
    Been running an Alienware QOLED 34" Ultrawide for a while now (year or two but must have racked up
    4-5k hours on) - its my gaming screen, taskbar on auto hide and an animated background picture and the pixel refresh basically set to run daily when I turn off for the night. Not the slightest hint of burn in and I still love the quality of the image :)
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    I don't think this is as unrealistic as it seems, especially for people who buy an OLED for photo or video work for the superior color reproduction and contrast. This isn't also that far off people who use OLED screen laptops for school or work purposes who will be using them in areas requiring more than 200 nits of brightness, and as we all know OLED is quickly replacing IPS screens in more price segments, and now even the upcoming MacBook Pro will have an OLED.

    Granted this test was a bit on the extreme side, but if you drop the better part of $1000 on an OLED monitor or over $2000 for a MacBook Pro OLED, you would expect the display to last without needing to baby it.

    I also keep going back to the Tomsguide article on burn in, where the author did not abuse his display like Monitors Unboxed yet still fell victim to it in a relatively short period of time.

    https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/i-didnt-fear-burn-in-on-my-oled-gaming-monitor-until-i-got-burned
    Reply