Trending

GeForce GTX 660 Ti Review: Nvidia's Trickle-Down Keplernomics

By Components 

Nvidia's Kepler architecture is finally manifest in a $300 graphics card, which the company says beats AMD's Radeon HD 7870 and challenges its more expensive 7950. Can this GK104-based mainstream card carve out a spot between the GCN-based competition?

Benchmark Results: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

We're able to turn on the most demanding Ultra detail preset in The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim now that this title is sufficiently patched and optimized.

Although the GeForce GTX 660 Ti sits at the bottom of our chart, all of the cards achieve minimum frame rates of at least 68. So, the fact that a Radeon HD 7970 averages 106 FPS is fairly inconsequential.

A  1920x1080 resolution has little effect on frame rates, as the GTX 660 Ti continues to deliver at least 60 FPS or so.

We finally see a handful of boards dip below 60 FPS at 2560x1600. They never drop under 40 FPS, though. Nvidia's GeForce GTX 660 Ti trails the pack, but continues delivering playable performance.

205 Comments Comment from the forums
  • game junky 16 August 2012 20:37
    Hmm. I have been wanting to replace my 560 - this throws a wrench in the gears. I was sold on a ASUS 670 but I think I'll wait to compare specs with their 660ti - I just started ripping my BD collection so the additional RAM bandwidth might be worth the extra $100 but it is still an interesting option.
    Reply
  • crisan_tiberiu 16 August 2012 20:40
    so, this is basically a card that costs 40$ less then a GTX 580, consumes 100W less power then a gtx 580 and its 8% better...hmm, intresting.
    Reply
  • crisan_tiberiu 16 August 2012 20:41
    *edit, costs 100$ less then GTX 580.
    Reply
  • rmpumper 16 August 2012 20:43
    That's strange - on techpowerup review the 660Ti is above 7950's average performance.
    Reply
  • outlw6669 16 August 2012 20:49
    game junkyI was sold on a ASUS 670 but I think I'll wait to compare specs with their 660ti.Asus' DCU2 Top ends up about 5% faster than stock, 8% slower than stock GTX 670 and still uses that excellent cooler.
    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_660_Ti_Direct_Cu_II/1.html

    Still, the GTX 660Ti looks to be a decent card.
    Not really fond of how nVidia keeps nerfing their memory bandwidth though.
    Once prices drop a little, I could see it being an excellent mainstream card.
    Reply
  • verbalizer 16 August 2012 21:03
    nice card, not OVERLY impressed...
    BUT THE PRICE...!
    c'mon SON let's be real here......
    ridiculous @ $300 beans..
    Reply
  • hellfire24 16 August 2012 21:07
    waiting for a price cut down.who's with me?
    Reply
  • felipetga 16 August 2012 21:10
    I have been holding to upgrade my GTX 460 256bits. I wonder if this card will be bottlenecked by my C2Q 9550 @ 3.6ghz....
    Reply
  • verbalizer 16 August 2012 21:12
    GPGPU = Kepler = FAIL....
    that's depressing but I understand nVidia has designated GTX 6 series as a gaming cards but c'mon SON.!!!
    ridiculous once again..
    Reply
  • EzioAs 16 August 2012 21:19
    Clearly we need more price cuts on the 660ti. I expect AMD to lower the prices even more, heck online retailers sell Radeon cards lower than the MSRP, making 7950 and 7870 even more budget friendly. It's still sad really to see mid-range cards battling at $300+. It used to be $250 and lower
    Reply