Microsoft Now Recruiting for Windows 8

Next news
6:50 PM - November 13, 2009 by Kevin Parrish

A recent job opening at Microsoft indicates that the company is gearing up for Windows 8.

CodenameWindows discovered that Microsoft was recruiting new software engineers for Windows 8. The job listing, originally listed here, now shows that the job is no longer available. However, it revealed that Microsoft sought out new recruits for the planning and preparation of the Windows Update Client for Windows 8.

"We just finished up work on Windows 7, and are pushing forth on Windows 8 planning and preparation," the description read. "There are opportunities to work on a number of hard problems, including third-party application updating, updating virtual machines while they’re turned off (turns out this is pretty hard!), and delivering full applications, among others."

Just to provide an idea what Microsoft was looking for, the job required five years of industry experience, and a BS or greater in Computer Science or related technical fields. Obviously, the job listing indicates that Microsoft may be gearing up to develop Windows 8 despite version 7 just now hitting store shelves last month. It's unknown when the job was filled, or if Microsoft will post other Windows 8-related listings.

Keep an eye out for additional Windows 8 nuggets, possibly in the coming weeks as news of the job listing gets passed around the tech sites.

Follow me on twitter to get inside scoops and updates even faster!

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
apache_lives 11/14/2009 1:30 AM
Hide
-20+

64-bit only please, for got sake.

agnickolov 11/14/2009 1:37 AM
Hide
--2+

Quote :Obviously, the job listing indicates that Microsoft may be gearing up to develop Windows 8 despite version 7 just now hitting store shelves last month.


That should read because of course - the old version is done so the majority of the team moves to the next version. In fact, this team migration has probably started a while ago...

The_Blood_Raven 11/14/2009 1:46 AM
Hide
-20+

apache_lives :
64-bit only please, for got sake.



amen!

yang 11/14/2009 1:49 AM
Show
greenbuck 11/14/2009 2:15 AM
Hide
-6+

Cool, I guess they better start working on it. They only have four years.

Onyx2291 11/14/2009 2:22 AM
Hide
-3+

Takes a long time to develop an OS. Of course they're gonna start now. A majority moves on to the next thing. Others will update 7 until 8 comes out. Same with anything else. Car manufacturers crank out new models every year.

sciencectn 11/14/2009 2:24 AM
Show
Geibys 11/14/2009 2:35 AM
Hide
-6+

yang :
wow this is getting ridiculous, I hate constantly having to change my OS. Please just let me live a while with windows 7.



Its not like they force you to update

Netherscourge 11/14/2009 2:37 AM
Hide
-5+

Why not jump to 128-bit? It'll give CPU maufacturers something new to aim for.

kc5sym 11/14/2009 2:43 AM
Show
kc5sym 11/14/2009 2:43 AM
Show
Honis 11/14/2009 2:49 AM
Hide
-12+

I doubt 8 will have a 128bit version. The only application for such a high memory bandwidth would be in the server sector which I would expect in Windows Server 2012 (the windows that will divide by zero and end the world).

cheepstuff 11/14/2009 2:53 AM
Hide
-9+

Netherscourge :
Why not jump to 128-bit? It'll give CPU maufacturers something new to aim for.



we are many years (even several decades) away from needing a 128-bit OS. the only applications of such software today is in supercomputers. an OS like that will only give home computers a loss of performance due to an increase of instruction size. realize that a jump from 32 bit to 64 bit is nothing like 64 to 128.

by the way, a 32bit OS can take a maximum of 3.3 gigs of ram and a 64 bit takes a maximum of 16.8 million terabytes (16 exabytes). because the motherboard RAM limit is currently 12 gigs, i don't think microsoft is planning to release a PC 128bit OS any time soon.

descendency 11/14/2009 3:09 AM
Hide
-11+

I think they want to get back to the normal windows development cycle instead of the one they had between vista and xp.

tipoo 11/14/2009 3:13 AM
Hide
-8+

Netherscourge :
Why not jump to 128-bit? It'll give CPU maufacturers something new to aim for.



Windows 7 cant use all of the theoretical maximum RAM 64-bit can address. There is still lots (and I mean LOTS) of headroom, why make a jump so prematurely? Lets let 64-bit become standard first.

knowom 11/14/2009 3:27 AM
Hide
-1+

128 bit would be useful for DAW's a higher bit rate means more headroom, but a 128 bit CPU and OS probably won't come for quite awhile seeing as 64 bit is really just now transitioning into mainstream acceptance

matt2k 11/14/2009 3:29 AM
Show
Abrahm 11/14/2009 3:31 AM
Hide
--1+

There was already an article linking to comments made by a Windows developer about him working on 128bit parts of Windows 8. 128 bit is a good possibility for Windows 8.

jn77 11/14/2009 3:46 AM
Hide
-0+

Honestly I think we will hit 128 bit hardware sooner than people think, and you do not need to max out a few terabytes of ram to take advantage of 128bit computing power.

mrmez 11/14/2009 3:58 AM
Show
JOSHSKORN 11/14/2009 4:20 AM
Hide
-2+

Windows 7 is OK. Believe it or not, there's an instance or two I found which I prefer Windows Vista. Maybe I just need to make a theme change or something. Microsoft should just stop while they're ahead for now. Windows 7 is great. Maybe offer DX12 compatibility when it comes out as an update.

CoryInJapan 11/14/2009 4:25 AM
Hide
-10+

apache_lives :
64-bit only please, for got sake.
Quote :amen!




I second that amen

intesx 11/14/2009 4:54 AM
Show
shoelessinsight 11/14/2009 5:10 AM
Hide
--3+

apache_lives :
64-bit only please, for got sake.



There are still areas where a 32-bit version of Windows is needed and justified, with netbooks being the most obvious example. This will likely be the case even by the time Windows 8 is ready for release. It makes sense that they would develop both 32 and 64 bit versions if they can sell both.

What we need is not for Microsoft to stop developing 32-bit platforms, but for OEMs to stop selling 32-bit Windows on desktops and laptops. We're starting to see that now, with many home systems utilizing four gigabytes or more, but there are still many manufacturers that seem to be resisting.

We're four years behind schedule, but it looks like we may finally be getting there.

ptroen 11/14/2009 5:40 AM
Hide
-2+

Actually on top of the 64 bit which should be sufficient on the CPU side I would like to see something address the 32 bit GPU memory addressability issue. Current versions of DirectX(that includes 11) can only support 4 gigabytes of GPU memory. We are very close to reaching that maximum.

DjEaZy 11/14/2009 5:56 AM
Hide
-0+

... if i understand right, there is gonna be a 128Bit version... the question is... who gonna build a 128Bit CPU first...

climber 11/14/2009 8:11 AM
Hide
-0+

cheepstuff :
we are many years (even several decades) away from needing a 128-bit OS. the only applications of such software today is in supercomputers. an OS like that will only give home computers a loss of performance due to an increase of instruction size. realize that a jump from 32 bit to 64 bit is nothing like 64 to 128.by the way, a 32bit OS can take a maximum of 3.3 gigs of ram and a 64 bit takes a maximum of 16.8 million terabytes (16 exabytes). because the motherboard RAM limit is currently 12 gigs, i don't think microsoft is planning to release a PC 128bit OS any time soon.



Motherboard RAM limit 12GB? How about all those workstation and server motherboards that support 32, 64, 96, 128 144, 256GB of RAM? Yes the 256GB one is a specialty server board with a riser board for the extra memory. The extra registers to support the added memory space is highly important in scientific computing in the HPC sector, supercomputers, computing clusters, etc. However, think about having a 100+ GB RAMDISK that works at a few tens of GB/s? Wouldn't that make your apps scream.

ravewulf 11/14/2009 8:30 AM
Hide
--1+

I just wish they could make Libraries an optional feature instead of using it as default. Even if Libraries is very useful in some situations, I prefer to stick with regular folders for most situations.

sidran32 11/14/2009 8:40 AM
Hide
-4+

Nothing to see here... they aren't going to put their dev team on hiatus, and it doesn't take just a year to code a new OS. The next product should be already planned out and development underway by the time the current product hits the consumer market.

ravewulf :
I just wish they could make Libraries an optional feature instead of using it as default. Even if Libraries is very useful in some situations, I prefer to stick with regular folders for most situations.


You know, your folders are still there, you can... you know... just use them. :P

randomizer 11/14/2009 9:48 AM
Hide
-1+

Moving to 64-bit is not just about supporting more RAM. If you think it is, perhaps you should go read some Wikipedia. The move to 128-bit purely for more RAM is pointless, as not even the largest supercomputers can utilise the full address range of a 64-bit processor yet, especially if they are using x86-64 CPUs since those only have 48-bit memory address ranges anyway. Even a processor with a full 64-bit memory address range supports far too much memory to physically fit in a current computer system smaller than a city block.

buwish 11/14/2009 10:22 AM
Hide
-1+

Goes to show that there is never a slow moment as MS. 128-bit will probably make an appearance at the server level first at some point in the future; who knows when though. I'd be curious to eventually see what MS's plans are for in regard to the planned release of W8. My guess is that they'll see how W7 does over the next few years and take it from there.


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Various ills plague my testing as I was attempting to review a work in progress in many regards. The operating system might be ready to ship to software and hardware vendors but that does not mean all of the bugs have been worked out. Speaking with the hardware driver teams at Nvidia and AMD (formerly ATI), both companies stated that it is not difficult to build drivers for the new platform. However, both companies acknowledged that there are challenges to developing them. "You fix certain things, you optimize them and then you break other things," Guennadi Riguer, an AMD ISV engineer, said. The platform has a hard form but the small pieces change and new working driver builds are developed daily. I utilized the same hardware platform for my comparative tests. The only variables were the different operating systems and the hardware drivers. As you will see, there are still plenty of things to work out before launch day. One interesting issue I uncovered involved Nvidia's driver. Here is what I saw even though Vista "allegedly" installed Nvidia's English driver. While I followed standard procedure to install Nvidia's driver, Vista wanted no part in it. The driver page should have indicated Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX and not with the (Microsoft Corp.-WDDM) trailer. After several attempts I was able to get Windows Vista to accept the driver. While testing I noticed terrible performance in OpenGL applications even though Nvidia supplied an OpenGL ICD in the Forceware 97.46 build. I encountered some issues recording with Fraps in OpenGL so I reverted to using a separate capture card for the video. As you can see, the OpenGL driver was not being utilized and I sought help rectifying the situation. Apparently I uncovered an issue with the English version of Forceware 97.46. The conclusion was that the Windows Vista installer was causing problems during installation. I had to use the international driver version for my tests. This cleared the problem and I was able to do the tests. You will notice from the test setup chart below that I used the Nvidia GeForce 7900GTX and not the GeForce 8800GTX. This is due to the driver situation. There currently isn't a public driver for the 8000 series cards and I used what the rest of the world can download today. This is a comparison of Vista to XP. The cards tested are irrelevant as they stay the same between the tests. Test Setup System Hardware Processor(s) Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 Conroe 2.93 GHz, 1,066 MHz FSB, 32 kB + 32 kB L1 , 4 MB L2 Platform eVGA 122-CK-NF68-AR, LGA 775 Nvidia nForce 680i SLI, BIOS version 2.053.57 RAM Corsair CM2X1024-9136C5D 2x 1024 MB DDR2 @ 800 MHz (CL5-5-5-15) Hard Drive Western Digital Raptor, WD1500ADFD 150 GB, 10,000 rpm, 16 MB cache, SATA150 Networking On-Board nForce4 Gigabit Ethernet Graphics Cards ATI Radeon X1950XTX 512 MB GDDR4 650 MHz Core 1,000 MHz Memory (2.00 GHz DDR) Nvidia GeForce 7900GTX 512 MB GDDR3 675 MHz Core 820 MHz Memory (1.64 GHz DDR) Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Turbo-Cool 1,000W CPU Cooler Zalman CNPS9700 LED System Software & Drivers OS Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.10.2600, Service Pack 2 Microsoft Windows Vista RTM - Ultimate DirectX Version Windows XP - 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) Windows Vista-Ultimate - 10 Graphics Driver(s) ATI - Catalyst 8.31.100.3.2.1 Vista 32 RTM Nvidia - Forceware 97.46 International

  • System Hardware Processor(s) Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 Conroe 2.93 GHz, 1,066 MHz FSB, 32kB+32kB L1 , 4 MB L2 Platform EVGA 122-CK-NF68-AR, LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI Intel D975XBX, LGA 775 Intel 975X Express Chipset RAM Corsair CM2X1024-9136C5D 2x 1024 MB DDR2 @ 800 MHz (CL5-5-5-15) Hard Drive Western Digital Raptor, WD1500ADFD 150 GB, 10,000 rpm, 16 MB cache, SATA150 Networking nForce4 Gigabit Ethernet (Nvidia), Intel 82573E/82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Intel) Graphics Cards AMD / ATI Based Cards ATI Radeon X1950XTX 512 MB GDDR4 580 MHz Core 700 MHz Memory (1.40 GHz DDR) Sapphire Radeon X1950 Pro Ultimate 256 MB GDDR3 580 MHz Core 800 MHz Memory (1.60 GHz DDR) Nvidia Based Cards EVGA GeForce 8600GTS 256 MB GDDR3 675 MHz Core 1.45 GHz Streaming Processor 1,000 MHz Memory (2.00 GHz DDR) Sparkle GeForce 8600 GT 256 MB GDDR3 540 MHz Core 1.19 GHz Streaming Processor 700 MHz Memory (1.40 GHz DDR) EVGA GeForce 8800 GTX KO 768 MB GDDR3 626 MHz Core 1.45 GHz Streaming Processor 1,000 MHz Memory (2.00 GHz DDR) Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768 MB GDDR3 575 MHz Core 1.35 GHz Streaming Processor 900 MHz Memory (1.80 GHz DDR) Foxconn GeForce 8800 GTS ONOC 640 MB GDDR3 575 MHz Core 1.20 GHz Streaming Processor 900 MHz Memory (1.80 GHz DDR) XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB GDDR3 500 MHz Core 1.20 GHz Streaming Processor 800 MHz Memory (1.60 GHz DDR) BFG GeForce 8800 GTS OC 320 MB GDDR3 550 MHz Core 1.30 GHz Streaming Processor 800 MHz Memory (1.60 GHz DDR) Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX 512 MB GDDR3 675 MHz Core 820 MHz Memory (1.64 GHz DDR) Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Turbo-Cool 1,000W CPU Cooler Zalman CNPS9700 LED System Software & Drivers OS Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.10.2600, Service Pack 2 DirectX Version 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) Graphics Driver(s) ATI - Catalyst 7.3 WHQL NVIDIA - Forceware 93.71 (7900 GTX) NVIDIA - Forceware 97.92 (8800 GTX & GTS) NVIDIA - Forceware 158.16 (8600 GTS & GT)

  • Because AMT is built in as hardware it can still make a connection when the PC is switched off and no OS is running - or if the PC is quarantined for security. Click the image to see a larger version. Intel's Centrino Pro and vPro business systems from Intel now include Active Management Technology (AMT), a hardware subsystem that lets an IT department check or change the system configuration over the network, even if the PC isn't running. This speeds up fixing systems that have been compromised by malware, but AMT also has some specific security features to protect PCs and quarantine them if they're compromised by a virus. AMT uses a small processor built into the network card or the northbridge of the processor chipset, called the Manageability Engine; the firmware for this is stored in the same flash memory as the BIOS. It uses a dedicated area of system memory to run the firmware. AMT is disabled by default, so you'll need to turn it on for each PC; an icon in the taskbar lets you know if it's running. When it's on, a Web server running in the Manageability Engine lets you see the status of the AMT system from a browser on another PC on the same network, as well as letting you turn the AMT PC on or off. It doesn't matter if the PC has crashed, because the Manageability Engine runs in S3 standby mode. Active Management Technology uses the hardware network filters and out of band communications to detect problems and apply policy; you control the policy from the management console on another PC. Click the image to see a larger version. With management software designed to work with AMT - like Symantec's Altiris products, Lenovo's Rescue and Recovery, HP OpenView and Microsoft System Management Center - you can reboot a PC, redirect it to boot from a network image to fix problems with the local OS, change BIOS settings, restart or update anti-virus software, install Windows updates, rebuild the hard drive, and delete suspicious applications. You can also get alerts for problems, and check what hardware and software is installed. There are 32 inbound and outbound hardware filters in the network controller to monitor network traffic, and automatically quarantine PCs to block network traffic if a system is behaving as if it's spreading a virus. This functions even if the operating system isn't fully operational, so a virus can't protect itself by hanging Windows. Intel calls this a "circuit breaker", but like other AMT features, it needs management software that's written to use it. Symantec is developing a virtual security system that uses AMT to run its own embedded OS and security apps outside of Windows, where malicious software can't affect it. The vPro platform is a combination of extra hardware features in the chipset, in the flash alongside the BIOS, in the network controller plus software to control these directly. Click the image to see a larger version.

Ads

Best offers

Dell Small Business Windows 7 Professional (Full Product) $299.99 Dell Small Business More info
Newegg.com Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... $119.95 Newegg.com More info
Dell Small Business Windows 7 Home Premium (Upgrade) $119.99 Dell Small Business More info
Dell Small Business Windows 7 Ultimate (Full Product) $319.99 Dell Small Business More info
Dell Small Business Norton Internet Security 2010 - 3 Users $69.99 Dell Small Business More info
Ads
All about Software
 Latest Software articles
Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools

Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools
Windows 7 is more stable and responsive than Vista, but no operating system is perfect (the same goes for the drivers and apps running on it). We show you a suite of tools built into Microsoft’s shiny new OS to help you troubleshoot your Windows 7 issues. Read More

  • Windows 7 And Windows Vista: Performance Compared
    Microsoft is hyping Windows 7 as the operating system that everyone should adopt. We'd already done a bit of benchmarking in the new OS, but we revisit a longer list of tests today, including more real-world tasks, like boot-up, hibernate, and shutdown. Read More
All Software articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

Ads

Sponsored links