Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel Quietly Launches Ten New Mobile Processors

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US | B 20 comments

It may have been a long weekend but somebody over at Intel was in the office. Intel on Sunday quietly slipped a total of nine new Haswell processors and one new Celeron into its price list without any fanfare. The price list shows no other changes.

These are all mobile processors and the nine new Haswell additions are split between Intel’s Core i5 and Core i7 families. The four new Core i5 processors are the 4310M, the 4310U, the 4340M, and the 4360U. All four boast two hyper-threaded cores and pack 3 MB of L3 cache. The Core i5-4310M features Intel HD 4600 graphics and is clocked to 2.7 GHz while the Core i5-4310U is clocked to 2 GHz and features Intel HD 4400 graphics. These are priced at $225 and $281, respectively. The Core i5-4340M boasts a frequency of 2.9 GHz and HD 4600 graphics and is priced at $266. Rounding out the new additions to Core i5 family is the Core I5-4360U. This chip sports a 1.5 GHz frequency, HD 5000 graphics and a price tag that reads $315.

The new Core i7s include the Core I7-4940MX Extreme Edition, which debuts at $1096. This quad-core CPU packs 8 MB of L3 cache, a clock speed of 3.1 GHz, and integrated HD 4600 graphics. Next up is the quad-core Core i7-4910MQ with 8 MB of L3 cache, clock speed of 2.9 GHz and HD 4600 graphics. It’s priced at $568. The Core i7-4810MQ is clocked at 2.8 GHz, packs HD 4600 graphics, and costs $378, while the Core i7-4860HQ is clocked to 2.4 GHz, boasts HD 5200 graphics and costs $434. Both include 6 MB of L3 cache. Lastly, there’s the Core i7-4610M, which packs 4 MB of L3 cache, two cores and a 3 GHz clock speed. It costs $346 and comes with HD 4600 graphics.

Rounding out the lot is a new uLV Celeron. This dual-core CPU is clocked to 1.1 GHz and packs 2 MB of L3 cache. It’s priced at $107.

Follow Jane McEntegart @JaneMcEntegart. Follow us @tomshardware, on Facebook and on Google+.

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
  • -2 Hide
    danwat1234 , January 21, 2014 11:40 PM
    I'm assuming the 4940MX had a turbo of 4GHZ, so it's 100MHZ faster in both the base clock and the turbo clock versus the 4930MX. Not much performance increase there. Overclocking opportunities on laptops with good cooling solutions? There is no more FSB so it's more complicated.
  • 4 Hide
    jerm1027 , January 22, 2014 1:37 AM
    Quote:
    There is no more FSB so it's more complicated.
    I'm not sure if you've just been living under a rock, or simply don't know what FSB is. Front Side Bus was the connection of the north bridge to the CPU. Tweaking the FSB had the unwanted side effect of also changing memory speed as well, since at the time the memory controller was on the northbridge chipset. So, you had a series of checks and balances, and actually had to run stress tests on your memory in addition to the CPU. With modern unlocked CPUs, there isn't an FSB because a lot of the northbridge (or chipset) is integrated into the CPU itself, and has been replaced by faster standards (DMI, QPI, or HyperTransport). Since the multiplier is unlocked, you can just raise that to overclock and done. No memory to worry about, don't have to worry about your northbridge, memory controller, etc. It's actually gotten simpler.
  • 5 Hide
    guvnaguy , January 22, 2014 1:49 AM
    While I'm all for lots of options, I must say I miss the Core 2 days when there were far fewer numbers and letters to keep track of. I barely get the naming scheme now.
  • Display all 20 comments.
  • 4 Hide
    cypeq , January 22, 2014 4:32 AM
    Jane use tables, please.
  • 2 Hide
    InvalidError , January 22, 2014 6:12 AM
    Quote:
    While I'm all for lots of options, I must say I miss the Core 2 days when there were far fewer numbers and letters to keep track of. I barely get the naming scheme now.

    I'm just annoyed with how mobile chips are just a mess of chips that follows desktop specs roughly one rung lower... the mobile i7 lineup is a mess of desktop i3/i5/i7 specs (some dual-core chips, some quad-core chips, some with HT, some without), the mobile i5 lines up with the desktop i3 (dual-core with HT), the mobile i3 is somewhere between desktop Pentium and i3, etc.

    IMO, there is way too much hair-splitting and inconsistencies (with desktop models) in Intel's mobile lineup.
  • 3 Hide
    cypeq , January 22, 2014 6:29 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    While I'm all for lots of options, I must say I miss the Core 2 days when there were far fewer numbers and letters to keep track of. I barely get the naming scheme now.
    I'm just annoyed with how mobile chips are just a mess of chips that follows desktop specs roughly one rung lower... the mobile i7 lineup is a mess of desktop i3/i5/i7 specs (some dual-core chips, some quad-core chips, some with HT, some without), the mobile i5 lines up with the desktop i3 (dual-core with HT), the mobile i3 is somewhere between desktop Pentium and i3, etc.IMO, there is way too much hair-splitting and inconsistencies (with desktop models) in Intel's mobile lineup.
    This is intentional... effort to misslead unaware customer. Customer will possibly know that i7 is the best of range. what he doesn't know is that he's buying desktop i3 labled as i7. It's probably legal because they don't hide real specs from buyers... only most of them don't understand any of that.

    Same goes for moblie gpu market where under desktop name X you get X minus two performance tiers.
  • 0 Hide
    Keyrock42 , January 22, 2014 6:33 AM
    "The four new Core i5 processors are the 4310M, the 4310U, the 4340M, and the 4360U. All four boast two hyper-threaded cores and pack 3 MB of L3 cache."Hold up, did Intel change its naming scheme or did I have it wrong the whole time? I thought i7 = 4 cores hyperthreading, i5 = 4 cores, no hyperthreading, i3 = 2 cores hyperthreading.
  • 1 Hide
    InvalidError , January 22, 2014 7:16 AM
    Quote:
    Hold up, did Intel change its naming scheme or did I have it wrong the whole time? I thought i7 = 4 cores hyperthreading, i5 = 4 cores, no hyperthreading, i3 = 2 cores hyperthreading.

    Nah. The model branding/numbering between desktop and mobile has always been messed up like that. Even with desktop models those general descriptions go out the windows when you look at low-power T/S variants.

    You really cannot rely on model number or product line with Intel's "simpler" numbering scheme. The simplest way to compare models these days is to use tables.

    I find it ironic how Intel used to say the alphabet soup after the CPU architecture designation and clock speed as model numbers was "confusing" - seeing what they did to make things "simpler," the alphabet soup from the 386-P4 days seems like the simplest model numbering scheme Intel has ever had: pick a CPU family, pick a clock frequency, find the letters that correspond to the features you want, that's your model number now all you need to do is find the closest match.
  • 1 Hide
    vmem , January 22, 2014 8:01 AM
    only when you're Intel, is releasing 10 CPUs a 'quiet' business lol
  • 0 Hide
    Keyrock42 , January 22, 2014 8:37 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Hold up, did Intel change its naming scheme or did I have it wrong the whole time? I thought i7 = 4 cores hyperthreading, i5 = 4 cores, no hyperthreading, i3 = 2 cores hyperthreading.

    Nah. The model branding/numbering between desktop and mobile has always been messed up like that. Even with desktop models those general descriptions go out the windows when you look at low-power T/S variants.

    You really cannot rely on model number or product line with Intel's "simpler" numbering scheme. The simplest way to compare models these days is to use tables.

    I find it ironic how Intel used to say the alphabet soup after the CPU architecture designation and clock speed as model numbers was "confusing" - seeing what they did to make things "simpler," the alphabet soup from the 386-P4 days seems like the simplest model numbering scheme Intel has ever had: pick a CPU family, pick a clock frequency, find the letters that correspond to the features you want, that's your model number now all you need to do is find the closest match.

    Thanks for your reply. It doesn't make me any less confused, but that's Intel's fault, not yours.

    As for the switch from the supposedly complicated (yet in retrospect quite simple) old naming scheme to the new "simple" (yet in reality convoluted and needlessly complicated) naming scheme, I would imagine that "simplicity" was just a guise, the reality of the situation was that using clock speed as part of the naming scheme became exceedingly less attractive when they ran into the 4 GHz thermal brick wall.
  • -1 Hide
    jasonelmore , January 22, 2014 11:44 AM
    The real way to judge if a Intel Mobile CPU is good or not is to simply look at it's L3 Cache. 8MB of Cache is desktop grade CPU performance : ie i7 on desktop6MB of Cache is the sweet spot for both price and performance: ie i5 on desktop3MB of Cache: honestly these are i3's or celeron cores. They can slap i7 on it, but all your getting is hyperthreading on a i3 cpu
  • 3 Hide
    jasonelmore , January 22, 2014 11:46 AM
    gotta love how toms comments does not have any formatting support, or reply notifications. absolute shit
  • -1 Hide
    vider , January 22, 2014 12:13 PM
    Are you for real??? Extreme edition only packing an HD 4600 from previous generation?! Tha' smack?! That's no reason to pay for a high end CPU and a garbage GPU 1096$, are you kidding me ? ? ? Got to be a donkey to fork that much on this.... *-_-
  • 0 Hide
    ferooxidan , January 22, 2014 1:31 PM
    why not make a table like this: http://www.jagatreview.com/2014/01/sembilan-varian-baru-intel-haswell-untuk-mobile/
  • 0 Hide
    TheinsanegamerN , January 22, 2014 5:48 PM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Hold up, did Intel change its naming scheme or did I have it wrong the whole time? I thought i7 = 4 cores hyperthreading, i5 = 4 cores, no hyperthreading, i3 = 2 cores hyperthreading.
    Nah. The model branding/numbering between desktop and mobile has always been messed up like that. Even with desktop models those general descriptions go out the windows when you look at low-power T/S variants.You really cannot rely on model number or product line with Intel's "simpler" numbering scheme. The simplest way to compare models these days is to use tables.I find it ironic how Intel used to say the alphabet soup after the CPU architecture designation and clock speed as model numbers was "confusing" - seeing what they did to make things "simpler," the alphabet soup from the 386-P4 days seems like the simplest model numbering scheme Intel has ever had: pick a CPU family, pick a clock frequency, find the letters that correspond to the features you want, that's your model number now all you need to do is find the closest match.

    here is another way of looking at the mobile chips.
    pentium and celeron: slower, missing features, only useful for netbooks/chromebooks, ece.
    i3: dual core, hyperthreaded, 3mb l3,
    i5: same as the i3, but has turbo core.
    i7: quad core, hyperthreaded, 4mb l3,
    There are only 2 exceptions
    there is always a single dual core core i7. these models are identical to the mobile i5, except they have 4mb l3 and are clocked 100MHz higher. this will be one digit lower than the lowest quad cores (ie, i7 4600m is dual core, 4700m is lowest quad).
    the other exception is the ulv models. they are always dual core, never quad, and the y models are more efficient, but slower, than the u series.
  • 0 Hide
    jbheller , January 22, 2014 11:01 PM
    Im assuming that the two most expensive chips Intel Core i7-4910MQ and Intel Core i7-4940MX will be bundled with discrete graphics. The low power Intel Core i7-4860HQ has a new HD5000 (or HD5200) depending on your source of information, and this will probably not bundled with discrete graphics. To be honest I hate the laptop market at the moment, with really low performance chips being designated i7 chips simply to suck in extra customers. A good i5 would be fine especially if bundled with a reasonable discrete graphics card and an SSD.
  • 0 Hide
    jbheller , January 22, 2014 11:03 PM
    Oh and the i5-4360U is also a low power chip bundled with a new generaltion integrated HD5000. One for the lower priced ultrabooks

  • 1 Hide
    jacobian , January 23, 2014 12:43 AM
    I really like Intel's mobile processors, the quad core i7 being my favorite. Sadly, AMD's APUs are no match for anything above Core i3, setting GPU performance aside.
  • 0 Hide
    danwat1234 , January 23, 2014 5:16 PM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    There is no more FSB so it's more complicated.
    I'm not sure if you've just been living under a rock, or simply don't know what FSB is. Front Side Bus was the connection of the north bridge to the CPU. Tweaking the FSB had the unwanted side effect of also changing memory speed as well, since at the time the memory controller was on the northbridge chipset. So, you had a series of checks and balances, and actually had to run stress tests on your memory in addition to the CPU. With modern unlocked CPUs, there isn't an FSB because a lot of the northbridge (or chipset) is integrated into the CPU itself, and has been replaced by faster standards (DMI, QPI, or HyperTransport). Since the multiplier is unlocked, you can just raise that to overclock and done. No memory to worry about, don't have to worry about your northbridge, memory controller, etc. It's actually gotten simpler.
    Your right I didn't mean to say FSB. You can't raise it much without interfering with RAM stability, PCI stability,etc. Yes I think there is the unlocked multiplier on modern CPUs but now days you can't simply increase the voltage to overclock further, right? You have all this TDP business where you have to boost the TDP value and mess with Turboboost bin timers and do other things to get an affective overclock. Right?With my X9100 it's simple FSB, multiplier and Vcore and I can go to town with Throttlestop.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , January 27, 2014 11:43 AM
    To bad the 20 core Opteron plans were scrapped after the fiasco of the Bulldozer.