Acer Predator XB252Q 240Hz Monitor Review

In the battle for gaming monitor supremacy, there’s Acer and Asus, and then there’s everyone else. Those two companies can always be counted on to push the envelope in display performance, and thanks to the Predator and Republic of Gamers lines, we have a large field of very fast screens that promise smooth action with the latest features, like G-Sync, ULMB, and high refresh rates.

Today, we’re checking out Acer’s answer to the Asus ROG PG258Q. The Predator XB252Q is similar to that excellent screen in nearly every way. They both share the same 25” FHD/TN panel with a native refresh rate of 240Hz, ULMB up to 144Hz, and G-Sync courtesy of Nvidia’s latest module, which adds an HDMI 1.4 input to the mix. Understated styling and a nearly zero-bezel design add up to a performance-oriented display that can anchor the highest of the high-end in gaming PCs. Let’s take a look.

Specifications

The spec sheets for both monitors are identical, so for most users, the decision will come down to brand loyalty and price. At this writing, the XB252Q undercuts Asus by around $70. It also offers subtler styling, which may appeal to some. Asus had incorporated a neat spaceship aesthetic into its latest ROG products with lighting that comes from the base. Acer sticks with a more industrial-looking panel and a base that suggests its intent without being too obvious.

An FHD-resolution TN panel may look like a lack of progress to some readers, but this is a performance-first product. Even with the stoutest video card, you’ll be hard-pressed to top 200 FPS with a QHD/IPS panel. And ultimately, motion resolution impacts picture quality more than outright pixel density. To that end, Acer has upped the ante with a super bright part that exceeds 400 nits and can run at 240Hz without overclock. ULMB is available at up to 144Hz, which makes the feature truly usable, and a viable alternative to G-Sync for reducing motion blur and other artifacts. Of course, G-Sync is there too, from 24-240Hz, which should ensure perfect motion no matter how intense the action becomes.

Packaging, Physical Layout & Accessories

Every side of the XB252Q’s oversized carton lays its intent out plainly. The feature list is printed clearly so you know just what you’re paying for. The contents are well protected and only require attachment of the upright, which snaps in place. The power supply is internal so an IEC cord is included. Video signals are carried by the provided HDMI and DisplayPort cables. If you find yourself in need of the USB ports, a v3.0 cable is in the box. Documentation is available from Acer’s website.

Product 360

Acer has gone for a simple style with the XB252Q that almost qualifies it as a sleeper product. The panel’s chassis looks like any other monitor with a bulge across the back and only a small Predator logo on the front. The bezel is quite thin at only 7mm across the top and sides and 21mm at the bottom. Like other “zero-frame” displays, there is a visible border around the image, but this is the smallest one we’ve seen yet. The anti-glare layer is 3H-hardness and fits tightly for a sharp and grain-free image. Our sample had no visible bleed or glow and rendered excellent uniformity.

The base shows a little style with its angular form and shiny trim. You’ll get to play the “find the wrap” game when unpacking, as all the glossy bits are protected by film. It looks minimal but underneath the hard plastic is a stout metal core. The monitor is very stable and shows no play or wobble in its movements. Adjustments include 4.8” of height, 45° swivel in each direction, 25° total tilt, and a portrait mode.

Controls are a mix of buttons and a firm-clicking joystick. They can be found around back but rather than going up the side, they are arrayed horizontally across the bottom. Small icons appear on the screen to tell you their functions. The menu system is excellent and will be familiar to users of the latest Acer monitors.

A large component bulge makes the XB252Q one of the thicker panels we’ve seen of late. At nearly 3", it won’t win any slimness awards. There is ample grill work to keep things cool and to allow the rear-firing speakers room to breathe. At 2W apiece, they won’t fill your room with sound, but they are adequate when there is no other alternative. If you wish to connect peripherals, two of the USB 3.0 ports are on the left side. Monitor arm users will find a 100mm VESA mount when the upright is removed.

The input panel is typical of the latest G-Sync monitors. You get one each of HDMI 1.4 and DisplayPort 1.2. Headphones can be plugged into the 3.5mm analog output. Two more downstream and a single upstream USB port are also found here.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: Best Professional Monitors

MORE: How We Test Monitors

MORE: How To Choose A Monitor

MORE: All Monitor Content

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
22 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • Lucky_SLS
    These 240Hz r for the Hardcore Henry of e-sports gamers,
    Bring out the HDR and FreeSync 2 beauties !!!
    -1
  • dstarr3
    The last time I had a TN panel was 15 years ago. I should give them another shot, they probably look a lot better today than they did the last time I had one.
    3
  • BulkZerker
    Where's the freesync version?
    -2
  • AgentLozen
    I'm happy to see that engineers keep pushing the limits of panel technologies. It's a shame that this monitor couldn't have ran at a higher resolution or used a better display technology. Subjectively, can you see the difference between 144Hz and 240Hz?

    DSTARR3 said:

    The last time I had a TN panel was 15 years ago. I should give them another shot, they probably look a lot better today than they did the last time I had one.


    I'm using a Dell TN at home. After a little calibration, I think it looks great. Sometimes I notice the shoddy viewing angles and I sometimes wonder if it would look a little nicer with 8-bit color, but I'm satisfied otherwise. If you're in the market for a gaming monitor and you don't have bionic eyes that are sensitive to minor color inaccuracy, I'm sure this monitor would be great for you.
    2
  • joz
    Maybe I'm showing my age...

    But when did Acer become a premium product supplier? They used to sit right above "EMachines" when it came to jokes (and spec sheets) about their products performance and quality.


    That being said, I've been perfectly happy with my XB27.
    2
  • dstarr3
    Anonymous said:
    I'm happy to see that engineers keep pushing the limits of panel technologies. It's a shame that this monitor couldn't have ran at a higher resolution or used a better display technology. Subjectively, can you see the difference between 144Hz and 240Hz?

    DSTARR3 said:

    The last time I had a TN panel was 15 years ago. I should give them another shot, they probably look a lot better today than they did the last time I had one.


    I'm using a Dell TN at home. After a little calibration, I think it looks great. Sometimes I notice the shoddy viewing angles and I sometimes wonder if it would look a little nicer with 8-bit color, but I'm satisfied otherwise. If you're in the market for a gaming monitor and you don't have bionic eyes that are sensitive to minor color inaccuracy, I'm sure this monitor would be great for you.


    I actually do have "bionic eyes," lol. I do a lot of photo editing that relies on color-accurate, calibrated displays, and I can pretty reliably detect inaccuracies, which is why I ditched TN panels 15 years ago. But that being said, I don't really need critical accuracy when playing games. I think I'd be alright with a super-high refresh rate at the expense of super-accurate color in games. So long as it looks, like, not obviously way off, I'm sure I'd be fine with it. The viewing angles might be problematic, though.
    0
  • ubercake
    How can Acer use the same panel as Asus and provide a monitor with the same specs, but in reality so much lower contrast? $70 difference.
    2
  • AgentLozen
    DSTARR3 said:

    I think I'd be alright with a super-high refresh rate at the expense of super-accurate color in games.


    That's what I'm trying to describe. There's never been a time when I was like, "Does Mercy have brown hair or blonde hair?" The picture is pretty good especially after a little calibration. I'm speaking from the experience of my Dell TN.
    0
  • dstarr3
    Anonymous said:
    How can Acer use the same panel as Asus and provide a monitor with the same specs, but in reality so much lower contrast? $70 difference.


    If I had to guess, binning. The panels roll off the line, some are better than others, Asus pays the premium for the best ones, Acer takes the rest.
    1
  • Lucky_SLS
    ^ wait, that's there even in monitor panels? I thought binning is only for cpu.
    1
  • egyptiankang
    Anonymous said:
    How can Acer use the same panel as Asus and provide a monitor with the same specs, but in reality so much lower contrast? $70 difference.


    You can pick up the XB252Q for $430 if you are near a Micro Center guess it's just the Asus Rog tax.
    0
  • dstarr3
    Anonymous said:
    ^ wait, that's there even in monitor panels? I thought binning is only for cpu.


    I don't know for sure if there is such a thing as binning with monitor panels, but binning is absolutely a manufacturing procedure that extends beyond CPUs. Wristwatches, for example. A wide variety of watches use mechanisms that were built on the same assembly line, but the ones that roll off the line and keep better time go in more expensive watches.
    0
  • Lucky_SLS
    ^ yeah, I know abt binning, but just wasn't sure abt screen panels though. Mostly cuz I don't know how they are manufactured. [mechanical engineer here ^_^]
    0
  • extremepcs1
    I'll stick with my 16:10 IPS.
    0
  • Rekta1981
    1440p sure but not 1080p
    0
  • AgentLozen
    extremepcs1 said:

    I'll stick with my 16:10 IPS.


    God pulled a week of all-nighters on a 16:10 IPS when he designed the world. The art assets are all made in MSPaint and He wove it all together in assembly.
    0
  • sztepa82
    The article starts with "In the battle for gaming monitor supremacy, there’s Acer and Asus, and then there’s everyone else." WAT.......

    I didn't bother to read any further
    0
  • Lucky_SLS
    ^ but that's pretty much true imo. LG, all though a good panel maker, doesn't have many high end monitors and no g sync to be particular. View sonic has just entered the market and BenQ is just now slowly including g sync ones in its portfolio.
    So yes, Asus and acer are the front runners.
    Samsung monitors till now have ghosting issues.
    0
  • Maykel_1
    We have a computer company to which you are invited in http://nomasvirus.com/, we are implementing a gaming equipment, and the truths that we lack some quality screens like these, there would be some offer to acquire 10 units or it is a single price ? we would be very interested.
    -1
  • AgentLozen
    I'll trade you 10 units for a copy of Noma's Virus.
    -1